期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
微射流辅助酶解制备低敏性豆粉的工艺优化 被引量:3
1
作者 范志军 陈龙 +2 位作者 于爱华 孙斌 林艳春 《食品科技》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第5期59-65,共7页
利用高压微射流辅助酶解技术降低豆粉的致敏性,在单因素的基础上,采用响应面分析法对高压微射流辅助酶解制备低致敏性豆粉的工艺参数进行优化,确定最佳的高压微射流压力为80MPa、酶解时间为45min、酶解温度为60℃、酶解pH为6。在最优工... 利用高压微射流辅助酶解技术降低豆粉的致敏性,在单因素的基础上,采用响应面分析法对高压微射流辅助酶解制备低致敏性豆粉的工艺参数进行优化,确定最佳的高压微射流压力为80MPa、酶解时间为45min、酶解温度为60℃、酶解pH为6。在最优工艺条件下豆粉中致敏性蛋白的含量为1.79%,与传统的方法相比,豆粉的致敏性降低了近5%;SDS-PAGE试验也表明,利用高压微射流辅助酶解技术制备的豆粉中,大分子的致敏性蛋白降解为小分子的蛋白质,降低了豆粉的致敏性,表明高压微射流辅助酶解技术能够降低豆粉的致敏性。 展开更多
关键词 高压微射流 酶解 低敏性 豆粉
原文传递
A Possible Hypoallergenic Cereal in Wheat Food Allergy and Baker’s Asthma
2
作者 Alicia Armentia Sara Martín +4 位作者 Araceli Diaz-Perales Arantxa Palacín Leticia Tordesillas Manuel Herrero Blanca Martín-Armentia 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2012年第12期1779-1781,共3页
Background: Wheat is a potent allergen source and is one of the causes of baker’s asthma and food allergy. The best strategy for managing food hypersensitivity involves strict avoidance of the trigger. However, wheat... Background: Wheat is a potent allergen source and is one of the causes of baker’s asthma and food allergy. The best strategy for managing food hypersensitivity involves strict avoidance of the trigger. However, wheat is quite difficult to avoid. Several alternative strategies for the treatment of food allergy are under study. Spelt is a possible hypoallergenic crop that may be tried in patients with wheat allergy. Methods: We have evaluated the allergenic IgE hypersensitivity mediated by spelt in wheat allergic patients. Overall, 66 patients who suffered from baker’s asthma or food allergy (45 males and 21 females, mean age 28.6 ± 12.9 years) were included. We have also compared its reactivity with standard- ized extracts from wheat and with purified non-specific lipid transfer proteins from wheat (Tri a 14) and from peach (Pru p 3). Immunodetection with spelt and common bread wheat extracts (Triticum aestivum, cultivar Astral) was per- formed. Fresh wheat and spelt grain extracts were used both for oral and bronchial challenge and skin tests. Specific IgE detection to different cereals was performed using the Immuno CAP System (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden). The bronchial challenge was positive with wheat Astral in 44 (67%) patients, all of them suffered from asthma. Thirteen (29.54%) of these 44 patients had negative the challenge with spelt. The oral challenge with wheat Astral was positive in 22 (33%) patients with wheat food allergy, and the same test was positive in only in 6 of them with spelt (27.3%). The diagnostic yield (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) of routine tests in determining spelt allergy by specific positive challenge responses was determined. Prick tests for spelt versus positive challenge tests had a good sensitivity (94%, 86.5 - 99.4;95%CI) and specificity (86%, 84 - 90;95% CI) for the diagnosis of spelt allergy. Immunodetection detected minor differences among different extracts. Conclusion: In summary, the prick test and bronchial and oral challenges both efficiently detec 展开更多
关键词 SPELT WHEAT ALLERGY Food ALLERGY low allergenic Plant Culture
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部