OBJECTIVE To identify the mechanisms by which the formyl peptide receptor 2(FPR2)mediates both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signaling in an agonist-dependent manner.METHODS Cells expressing FPR2 were incubated w...OBJECTIVE To identify the mechanisms by which the formyl peptide receptor 2(FPR2)mediates both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signaling in an agonist-dependent manner.METHODS Cells expressing FPR2 were incubated with weak agonists,Aβ42 and Ac2-26,before stimulation with a strong agonist,WKYMVm.Calcium mobilization,c AMP inhibition and MAP kinase activation were measured.Intramolecular FRET were determined using FPR2 constructs with an ECFP attached to the C-terminus and a Fl As H binding motif embedded in the first or third intracellular loop(IL1 or IL3,respectively).RESULTS Aβ42 did not induce significant Ca^(2+) mobilization,but positively modulated WKYMVm-induced Ca^(2+) mobilization and c AMP reduction in a dose-variable manner within a narrow range of ligand concentrations.Treating FPR2-expressing cells with Ac2-26,a peptide with anti-inflammatory activity,negatively modulated WKYMVm-induced Ca^(2+) mobilization and c AMP reduction.Intramolecular FRET assay showed that stimulation of the receptor constructs with Aβ42 brought the C-terminal domain closer to IL1 but away from IL3.An opposite conformational change was induced by Ac2-26.The FPR2 conformation induced by Aβ42 corresponded to enhanced ERK phosphorylation and attenuated p38 MAPK phosphorylation,whereas Ac2-26 induced FPR2 conformational change corresponding to elevated p38 MAPK phosphorylation and reduced ERK phosphorylation.CONCLUSION Aβ42 and Ac2-26 induce different conformational changes in FPR2.These findings provide a structural basis for FPR2 mediation of inflammatory vs anti-inflammatory functions and identify a type of receptor modulation that differs from the classic positive and negative allosteric modulation.展开更多
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(31470856 to RDY)the Science and Technology Development Fund of Macao(FDCT 072/2015/A2)the University of Macao(SRG2015-00047-ICMS-QRCM)
文摘OBJECTIVE To identify the mechanisms by which the formyl peptide receptor 2(FPR2)mediates both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signaling in an agonist-dependent manner.METHODS Cells expressing FPR2 were incubated with weak agonists,Aβ42 and Ac2-26,before stimulation with a strong agonist,WKYMVm.Calcium mobilization,c AMP inhibition and MAP kinase activation were measured.Intramolecular FRET were determined using FPR2 constructs with an ECFP attached to the C-terminus and a Fl As H binding motif embedded in the first or third intracellular loop(IL1 or IL3,respectively).RESULTS Aβ42 did not induce significant Ca^(2+) mobilization,but positively modulated WKYMVm-induced Ca^(2+) mobilization and c AMP reduction in a dose-variable manner within a narrow range of ligand concentrations.Treating FPR2-expressing cells with Ac2-26,a peptide with anti-inflammatory activity,negatively modulated WKYMVm-induced Ca^(2+) mobilization and c AMP reduction.Intramolecular FRET assay showed that stimulation of the receptor constructs with Aβ42 brought the C-terminal domain closer to IL1 but away from IL3.An opposite conformational change was induced by Ac2-26.The FPR2 conformation induced by Aβ42 corresponded to enhanced ERK phosphorylation and attenuated p38 MAPK phosphorylation,whereas Ac2-26 induced FPR2 conformational change corresponding to elevated p38 MAPK phosphorylation and reduced ERK phosphorylation.CONCLUSION Aβ42 and Ac2-26 induce different conformational changes in FPR2.These findings provide a structural basis for FPR2 mediation of inflammatory vs anti-inflammatory functions and identify a type of receptor modulation that differs from the classic positive and negative allosteric modulation.
