目的探讨血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(Serum-ascites albumin gradient,SAAG)与门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的关系,评价SAAG对预测门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的价值。方法测定47例肝硬化腹水患者SAAG值并行胃镜检查以了解有无食管静...目的探讨血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(Serum-ascites albumin gradient,SAAG)与门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的关系,评价SAAG对预测门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的价值。方法测定47例肝硬化腹水患者SAAG值并行胃镜检查以了解有无食管静脉曲张,以11g/L为界将47例患者分为高SAAG组及低SAAG组,分析SAAG与食管静脉曲张之间的关系。47例患者中并发食管静脉曲张破裂出血者15例,非出血者32例,测定两组患者的SAAG值并进行比较。结果 SAAG与食管静脉曲张、出血存在正相关关系(r=0.523,P<0.01;r=0.466,P<0.01);15例出血组患者其SAAG值为(22.67±4.47)g/L,32例非出血组患者其SAAG值为(17.25±5.21)g/L,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论 SAAG与门脉压力密切相关且对预测门脉高压性食管静脉出血有重要临床价值。展开更多
AIM:To compare the effect of endoscopic variceal ligation(EVL)with that of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS)in the treatment of patients withesophageal variceal bleeding.METHODS:We performed a systematic literat...AIM:To compare the effect of endoscopic variceal ligation(EVL)with that of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS)in the treatment of patients withesophageal variceal bleeding.METHODS:We performed a systematic literature search of multiple online electronic databases.Metaanalysis was conducted to evaluate risk ratio(RR)and95%confidence interval(CI)of combined studies for the treatment of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding between EVL and EIS.RESULTS:Fourteen studies comprising 1236 patients were included in the meta-analysis.The rebleeding rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group(RR=0.68,95%CI:0.57-0.81).The variceal eradication rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly higher than that in the EIS group(RR=1.06,95%CI:1.01-1.12).There was no significant difference about mortality rate between the EVL group and EIS group(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.77-1.17).The rate of complications in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group(RR=0.28,95%CI:0.13-0.58).CONCLUSION:Our meta-analysis has found that EVL is better than EIS in terms of the lower rates of rebleeding,complications,and the higher rate of variceal eradication.Therefore,EVL is the first choice for esophageal variceal bleeding.展开更多
文摘目的探讨血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(Serum-ascites albumin gradient,SAAG)与门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的关系,评价SAAG对预测门脉高压性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的价值。方法测定47例肝硬化腹水患者SAAG值并行胃镜检查以了解有无食管静脉曲张,以11g/L为界将47例患者分为高SAAG组及低SAAG组,分析SAAG与食管静脉曲张之间的关系。47例患者中并发食管静脉曲张破裂出血者15例,非出血者32例,测定两组患者的SAAG值并进行比较。结果 SAAG与食管静脉曲张、出血存在正相关关系(r=0.523,P<0.01;r=0.466,P<0.01);15例出血组患者其SAAG值为(22.67±4.47)g/L,32例非出血组患者其SAAG值为(17.25±5.21)g/L,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论 SAAG与门脉压力密切相关且对预测门脉高压性食管静脉出血有重要临床价值。
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81300273
文摘AIM:To compare the effect of endoscopic variceal ligation(EVL)with that of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS)in the treatment of patients withesophageal variceal bleeding.METHODS:We performed a systematic literature search of multiple online electronic databases.Metaanalysis was conducted to evaluate risk ratio(RR)and95%confidence interval(CI)of combined studies for the treatment of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding between EVL and EIS.RESULTS:Fourteen studies comprising 1236 patients were included in the meta-analysis.The rebleeding rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group(RR=0.68,95%CI:0.57-0.81).The variceal eradication rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly higher than that in the EIS group(RR=1.06,95%CI:1.01-1.12).There was no significant difference about mortality rate between the EVL group and EIS group(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.77-1.17).The rate of complications in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group(RR=0.28,95%CI:0.13-0.58).CONCLUSION:Our meta-analysis has found that EVL is better than EIS in terms of the lower rates of rebleeding,complications,and the higher rate of variceal eradication.Therefore,EVL is the first choice for esophageal variceal bleeding.