范晓蕾(2011)以语义地图模型为理论工具构建基于汉语方言的能性情态语义地图,该地图与van der Auwera&Plungian(1998)的主要差异是无语义关联"许可(参与者外在可能)—认识可能"。本文通过解释此差异来论证对van der Auwer...范晓蕾(2011)以语义地图模型为理论工具构建基于汉语方言的能性情态语义地图,该地图与van der Auwera&Plungian(1998)的主要差异是无语义关联"许可(参与者外在可能)—认识可能"。本文通过解释此差异来论证对van der Auwera&Plungian(1998)的主要修正之处。此问题的讨论既涉及语义地图方法论的问题:"形式"及"功能"应如何细分,也涉及情态类型系统的界定:情态概念应如何划类。本研究显示出,语义地图模型在方法论上需进一步完善,语义地图研究对普通语义学有很大的关照。展开更多
In this paper, a systematic review of non-probabilistic reliability metrics is conducted to assist the selection of appropriate reliability metrics to model the influence of epistemic uncertainty. Five frequently used...In this paper, a systematic review of non-probabilistic reliability metrics is conducted to assist the selection of appropriate reliability metrics to model the influence of epistemic uncertainty. Five frequently used non-probabilistic reliability metrics are critically reviewed, i.e., evidence- theory-based reliability metrics, interval-analysis-based reliability metrics, fuzzy-interval-analysis- based reliability metrics, possibility-theory-based reliability metrics （posbist reliability） and uncertainty-theory-based reliability metrics （belief reliability）. It is pointed out that a qualified reli- ability metric that is able to consider the effect of epistemic uncertainty needs to （ 1 ） compensate the conservatism in the estimations of the component-level reliability metrics caused by epistemic uncertainty, and （2） satisfy the duality axiom, otherwise it might lead to paradoxical and confusing results in engineering applications. The five commonly used non-probabilistic reliability metrics are compared in terms of these two properties, and the comparison can serve as a basis for the selection of the appropriate reliability metrics.展开更多
基金香港研究资助局优配研究计划‘A Semantic Map Approach to Comparative Chinese Dia-lectal Grammar’(项目编号:645510)的资助
文摘范晓蕾(2011)以语义地图模型为理论工具构建基于汉语方言的能性情态语义地图,该地图与van der Auwera&Plungian(1998)的主要差异是无语义关联"许可(参与者外在可能)—认识可能"。本文通过解释此差异来论证对van der Auwera&Plungian(1998)的主要修正之处。此问题的讨论既涉及语义地图方法论的问题:"形式"及"功能"应如何细分,也涉及情态类型系统的界定:情态概念应如何划类。本研究显示出,语义地图模型在方法论上需进一步完善,语义地图研究对普通语义学有很大的关照。
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.61573043)
文摘In this paper, a systematic review of non-probabilistic reliability metrics is conducted to assist the selection of appropriate reliability metrics to model the influence of epistemic uncertainty. Five frequently used non-probabilistic reliability metrics are critically reviewed, i.e., evidence- theory-based reliability metrics, interval-analysis-based reliability metrics, fuzzy-interval-analysis- based reliability metrics, possibility-theory-based reliability metrics （posbist reliability） and uncertainty-theory-based reliability metrics （belief reliability）. It is pointed out that a qualified reli- ability metric that is able to consider the effect of epistemic uncertainty needs to （ 1 ） compensate the conservatism in the estimations of the component-level reliability metrics caused by epistemic uncertainty, and （2） satisfy the duality axiom, otherwise it might lead to paradoxical and confusing results in engineering applications. The five commonly used non-probabilistic reliability metrics are compared in terms of these two properties, and the comparison can serve as a basis for the selection of the appropriate reliability metrics.
