目的观察腔内激光闭合联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂及地奥司明术后巩固治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效,并探讨其对瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素-6(IL-6)的影响。方法选取2014年3月至2015年3月广州医科大学第一附属医院整形外科收治的60例下肢静脉...目的观察腔内激光闭合联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂及地奥司明术后巩固治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效,并探讨其对瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素-6(IL-6)的影响。方法选取2014年3月至2015年3月广州医科大学第一附属医院整形外科收治的60例下肢静脉曲张患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组采用对大隐静脉行高位结扎术以及剥脱术,术后进行加压巩固治疗。观察组采用腔内激光闭合及泡沫硬化剂聚多卡醇注射,术后加压并予口服地奥司明辅助巩固治疗。观察两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、术后住院时间及术后并发症;采用静脉疾病临床分类系统(CEAP)、静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)评价两组疗效;比较两组患者治疗前后的TNF-α、IL-6水平。结果两组患者术后1个月CEAP临床分级均较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后随访6个月,对照组患者的CEAP临床分级较术后上升发生率为26.67%(8/30),明显多于观察组6.67%(3/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后6个月VCSS评分为(1.89±0.65),明显低于对照组的(3.12±0.83),差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组患者术后6个月血清TNF-α、IL-6浓度差值较术前明显减少[TNF-α(16.86±3.91)pg/m L vs(7.34±4.99)pg/m L;IL-6(31.96±9.78)pg/m L vs(5.81±4.11)pg/m L],差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论腔内激光闭合联合泡沫硬化剂聚多卡醇及地奥司明术后巩固治疗能够明显减少CEAP临床分级与VCSS评分,短期疗效与常规手术治疗相当。同时,其能够明显减少术后复发率,远期疗效显著,可能与抑制TNF-α、减少IL-6生成相关。展开更多
Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose ...Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose veins have changed dramatically due to the rise of minimally invasive endovascular techniques.The literature was systematically searched on Medline without language restrictions.All papers on the treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency with different procedures were included and reviewed.Endovenous laser ablation(EVLA)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)both are same safe and effective in terms of occlusion rate,and time to return to normal activity.In comparison with RFA or EVLT,Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l’Insufficience Veineuse en Ambulatoire(CHIVA)may cause more bruising and make little or no difference to rates of limb infection,superficial vein thrombosis,nerve injury,or hematoma.In terms of recurrence of varicose veins,there is little or no difference between CHIVA and stripping,RFA,or EVLT.Great saphenous vein recanalization is highest in the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy(FS)group(51%)during 1 year of follow-up.The 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines recommend surgery as a third-line therapeutic option after EVLA or RFA and sclerotherapy.Although the mechanochemical endovenous ablation(MOCA)is a non-thermal,non-tumescent option and appears to be of similar efficacy to stab avulsion with no potential risk of nerve damage,the overall success rate of MOCA is lower than those of other procedures such as EVLA,RFA,or high ligation and stripping.EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option,with RFA being a close second for the treatment of patients with varicose veins.Endovenous thermal ablation(EVLA or RFA)is recommended as a first-line treatment for varicose veins and has substituted the high ligation of saphenofemoral junctional reflux and stripping of varicose veins.Ultrasound-guided FS is associated with a high recurrenc展开更多
文摘目的观察腔内激光闭合联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂及地奥司明术后巩固治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效,并探讨其对瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素-6(IL-6)的影响。方法选取2014年3月至2015年3月广州医科大学第一附属医院整形外科收治的60例下肢静脉曲张患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组30例。对照组采用对大隐静脉行高位结扎术以及剥脱术,术后进行加压巩固治疗。观察组采用腔内激光闭合及泡沫硬化剂聚多卡醇注射,术后加压并予口服地奥司明辅助巩固治疗。观察两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、术后住院时间及术后并发症;采用静脉疾病临床分类系统(CEAP)、静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)评价两组疗效;比较两组患者治疗前后的TNF-α、IL-6水平。结果两组患者术后1个月CEAP临床分级均较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后随访6个月,对照组患者的CEAP临床分级较术后上升发生率为26.67%(8/30),明显多于观察组6.67%(3/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后6个月VCSS评分为(1.89±0.65),明显低于对照组的(3.12±0.83),差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组患者术后6个月血清TNF-α、IL-6浓度差值较术前明显减少[TNF-α(16.86±3.91)pg/m L vs(7.34±4.99)pg/m L;IL-6(31.96±9.78)pg/m L vs(5.81±4.11)pg/m L],差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论腔内激光闭合联合泡沫硬化剂聚多卡醇及地奥司明术后巩固治疗能够明显减少CEAP临床分级与VCSS评分,短期疗效与常规手术治疗相当。同时,其能够明显减少术后复发率,远期疗效显著,可能与抑制TNF-α、减少IL-6生成相关。
文摘Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose veins have changed dramatically due to the rise of minimally invasive endovascular techniques.The literature was systematically searched on Medline without language restrictions.All papers on the treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency with different procedures were included and reviewed.Endovenous laser ablation(EVLA)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)both are same safe and effective in terms of occlusion rate,and time to return to normal activity.In comparison with RFA or EVLT,Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l’Insufficience Veineuse en Ambulatoire(CHIVA)may cause more bruising and make little or no difference to rates of limb infection,superficial vein thrombosis,nerve injury,or hematoma.In terms of recurrence of varicose veins,there is little or no difference between CHIVA and stripping,RFA,or EVLT.Great saphenous vein recanalization is highest in the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy(FS)group(51%)during 1 year of follow-up.The 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines recommend surgery as a third-line therapeutic option after EVLA or RFA and sclerotherapy.Although the mechanochemical endovenous ablation(MOCA)is a non-thermal,non-tumescent option and appears to be of similar efficacy to stab avulsion with no potential risk of nerve damage,the overall success rate of MOCA is lower than those of other procedures such as EVLA,RFA,or high ligation and stripping.EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option,with RFA being a close second for the treatment of patients with varicose veins.Endovenous thermal ablation(EVLA or RFA)is recommended as a first-line treatment for varicose veins and has substituted the high ligation of saphenofemoral junctional reflux and stripping of varicose veins.Ultrasound-guided FS is associated with a high recurrenc
