目的比较第三代静注溶栓药物瑞替普酶和重组链激酶对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的临床疗效。方法静脉溶栓治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者40例,其中瑞替普酶组22例,重组链激酶组18例,观察血管再通率、死亡率、心力衰竭及休克...目的比较第三代静注溶栓药物瑞替普酶和重组链激酶对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的临床疗效。方法静脉溶栓治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者40例,其中瑞替普酶组22例,重组链激酶组18例,观察血管再通率、死亡率、心力衰竭及休克等并发症和出血不良反应。结果瑞替普酶组和重组链激酶组的临床再通率分别为86.36%和66.66%,其中60 m in及90 m in再通率瑞替普酶组高于重组链激酶组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。溶栓后30 d内再闭塞率、心力衰竭及梗死后心绞痛发生率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),死亡率分别为4.55%和5.55%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),出血发生率瑞替普酶组高于重组链激酶组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论瑞替普酶、重组链激酶均适合急诊室内急性心肌梗死患者的静脉溶栓治疗,瑞替普酶早期再通率高于重组链激酶。展开更多
The benefits of early perfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarctions(STEMI) are established; howeverearly perfusion of non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions has not been shown to be beneficial. In additionST eleva...The benefits of early perfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarctions(STEMI) are established; howeverearly perfusion of non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions has not been shown to be beneficial. In additionST elevation(STE) caused by conditions other thanacute ischemia is common. Non-ischemic STE may beconfused as STEMI, but can also mask STEMI on electrocardiogram(ECG). As a result, activating the primarypercutaneous coronary intervention(pPCI) protocooften depends on determining which ST elevation patterns reflect transmural infarction due to acute coronary artery thrombosis. Coordination of interpreting theECG in its clinical context and appropriately activatingthe pPCI protocol has proved a difficult task in borderline cases. But its importance cannot be ignored, asreflected in the 2013 American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association guidelines concerning the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Multiples strategies have been tested and studiedand are currently being further perfected. No mattethe strategy, at the heart of delivering the best care lies rapid and accurate interpretation of the ECG. Here, we present the different patterns of non-ischemic STE and methods of distinguishing between them. In writing this paper, we hope for quicker and better stratification of patients with STE on ECG, which will lead to be bet-ter outcomes.展开更多
文摘目的比较第三代静注溶栓药物瑞替普酶和重组链激酶对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的临床疗效。方法静脉溶栓治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者40例,其中瑞替普酶组22例,重组链激酶组18例,观察血管再通率、死亡率、心力衰竭及休克等并发症和出血不良反应。结果瑞替普酶组和重组链激酶组的临床再通率分别为86.36%和66.66%,其中60 m in及90 m in再通率瑞替普酶组高于重组链激酶组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。溶栓后30 d内再闭塞率、心力衰竭及梗死后心绞痛发生率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),死亡率分别为4.55%和5.55%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),出血发生率瑞替普酶组高于重组链激酶组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论瑞替普酶、重组链激酶均适合急诊室内急性心肌梗死患者的静脉溶栓治疗,瑞替普酶早期再通率高于重组链激酶。
基金Supported by John S Dunn Chair in Cardiology Research and Education
文摘The benefits of early perfusion in ST elevation myocardial infarctions(STEMI) are established; howeverearly perfusion of non-ST elevation myocardial infarctions has not been shown to be beneficial. In additionST elevation(STE) caused by conditions other thanacute ischemia is common. Non-ischemic STE may beconfused as STEMI, but can also mask STEMI on electrocardiogram(ECG). As a result, activating the primarypercutaneous coronary intervention(pPCI) protocooften depends on determining which ST elevation patterns reflect transmural infarction due to acute coronary artery thrombosis. Coordination of interpreting theECG in its clinical context and appropriately activatingthe pPCI protocol has proved a difficult task in borderline cases. But its importance cannot be ignored, asreflected in the 2013 American College of CardiologyFoundation/American Heart Association guidelines concerning the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction. Multiples strategies have been tested and studiedand are currently being further perfected. No mattethe strategy, at the heart of delivering the best care lies rapid and accurate interpretation of the ECG. Here, we present the different patterns of non-ischemic STE and methods of distinguishing between them. In writing this paper, we hope for quicker and better stratification of patients with STE on ECG, which will lead to be bet-ter outcomes.
