【目的】定量评估半干旱牧区天然打草场的生产能力,分析天然打草场的退化程度,明确气候因子对打草场生长过程的影响。【方法】利用Miami和Tharnthwaite Memorial模型计算2000—2017年半干旱牧区天然打草场气候生产潜力,并结合近18年的...【目的】定量评估半干旱牧区天然打草场的生产能力,分析天然打草场的退化程度,明确气候因子对打草场生长过程的影响。【方法】利用Miami和Tharnthwaite Memorial模型计算2000—2017年半干旱牧区天然打草场气候生产潜力,并结合近18年的中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)净初级生产力(NPP)产品(MOD17A2H)进行分析。【结果】2000—2017年半干旱牧区天然打草场实际生产力与潜在生产力均随降水增加呈上升趋势,天然打草场18年平均实际生产力和潜在生产力分别为295.24和557.79 g C·m^-2·a^-1。按不同草地类型分析,气候生产潜力与实际生产潜力均以草甸草原最高,分别为589.68 g C·m^-2·a^-1和349.78 g C·m^-2·a^-1,山地草甸的气候生产潜力最低,为518.72 g C·m^-2·a^-1,而实际生产潜力以典型草原最低,仅为269.52 g C·m^-2·a^-1。从变异系数来分析,气候生产潜力与实际生产力均以草甸草原最稳定。从年际变化率分析,草甸草原的气候生产潜力的上升速率最高,为6.30 g C·m^-2·a^-1,实际生产力以山地草甸上升速率最高,为4.44 g C·m^-2·a^-1。实际生产力对降水的响应高于温度,其中95.88%的打草场与降水呈显著正相关关系,与温度呈负相关的区域仅占总面积的5.70%,且不同草地类型的实际生产力均与降水在P<0.001水平呈显著正相关关系。【结论】天然打草场气候生产潜力呈由西向东递增的地带性规律,而实际生产力受水热条件的影响,以大兴安岭为中心向东西两麓逐渐递减,其对降水的响应高于温度,水分条件是该区植被生长的限制因子;年均气候资源利用率的分布规律与实际生产力相同,平均气候资源利用率为55.09%;以草甸草原打草场的气候资源利用率最高,高达60.34%,同时也是退化速度最高的草地类型。展开更多
Agricultural climatic resources （such as light,temperature,and water） are environmental factors that affect crop productivity.Predicting the effects of climate change on agricultural climatic resource utilization ca...Agricultural climatic resources （such as light,temperature,and water） are environmental factors that affect crop productivity.Predicting the effects of climate change on agricultural climatic resource utilization can provide a theoretical basis for adapting agricultural practices and distributions of agricultural production.This study investigates these effects under the IPCC （Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change） scenario A1B using daily data from the high-resolution RegCM3 （0.25° ×0.25°） during 1951-2100.Model outputs are adjusted using corrections derived from daily observational data taken at 101 meteorological stations in Northeast China between 1971 and 2000.Agricultural climatic suitability theory is used to assess demand for agricultural climatic resources in Northeast China during the cultivation of spring maize.Three indices,i.e.,an average resource suitability index （Isr）,an average efficacy suitability index （Ise）,and an average resource utilization index （K）,are defined to quantitatively evaluate the effects of climate change on climatic resource utilization between 1951 and 2100.These indices change significantly in both temporal and spatial dimensions in Northeast China under global warming.All three indices are projected to decrease in Liaoning Province from 1951 to 2100,with particularly sharp declines in Isr,Ise,and K after 2030,2021,and 2011,respectively.In Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces,Isr is projected to increase slightly after 2011,while Ise increases slightly and K decreases slightly after 2030.The spatial maxima of all three indices are projected to shift northeastward.Overall,warming of the climate in Northeast China is expected to negatively impact spring maize production,especially in Liaoning Province.Spring maize cultivation will likely need to shift northward and expand eastward to make efficient use of future agricultural climatic resources.展开更多
文摘【目的】定量评估半干旱牧区天然打草场的生产能力,分析天然打草场的退化程度,明确气候因子对打草场生长过程的影响。【方法】利用Miami和Tharnthwaite Memorial模型计算2000—2017年半干旱牧区天然打草场气候生产潜力,并结合近18年的中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)净初级生产力(NPP)产品(MOD17A2H)进行分析。【结果】2000—2017年半干旱牧区天然打草场实际生产力与潜在生产力均随降水增加呈上升趋势,天然打草场18年平均实际生产力和潜在生产力分别为295.24和557.79 g C·m^-2·a^-1。按不同草地类型分析,气候生产潜力与实际生产潜力均以草甸草原最高,分别为589.68 g C·m^-2·a^-1和349.78 g C·m^-2·a^-1,山地草甸的气候生产潜力最低,为518.72 g C·m^-2·a^-1,而实际生产潜力以典型草原最低,仅为269.52 g C·m^-2·a^-1。从变异系数来分析,气候生产潜力与实际生产力均以草甸草原最稳定。从年际变化率分析,草甸草原的气候生产潜力的上升速率最高,为6.30 g C·m^-2·a^-1,实际生产力以山地草甸上升速率最高,为4.44 g C·m^-2·a^-1。实际生产力对降水的响应高于温度,其中95.88%的打草场与降水呈显著正相关关系,与温度呈负相关的区域仅占总面积的5.70%,且不同草地类型的实际生产力均与降水在P<0.001水平呈显著正相关关系。【结论】天然打草场气候生产潜力呈由西向东递增的地带性规律,而实际生产力受水热条件的影响,以大兴安岭为中心向东西两麓逐渐递减,其对降水的响应高于温度,水分条件是该区植被生长的限制因子;年均气候资源利用率的分布规律与实际生产力相同,平均气候资源利用率为55.09%;以草甸草原打草场的气候资源利用率最高,高达60.34%,同时也是退化速度最高的草地类型。
基金Supported by the China Meteorological Administration Special Public Welfare Research Fund(GYHY201106020)ChinaMeteorological Administration Special Climate Change Research Fund(CCSF201346)
文摘Agricultural climatic resources （such as light,temperature,and water） are environmental factors that affect crop productivity.Predicting the effects of climate change on agricultural climatic resource utilization can provide a theoretical basis for adapting agricultural practices and distributions of agricultural production.This study investigates these effects under the IPCC （Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change） scenario A1B using daily data from the high-resolution RegCM3 （0.25° ×0.25°） during 1951-2100.Model outputs are adjusted using corrections derived from daily observational data taken at 101 meteorological stations in Northeast China between 1971 and 2000.Agricultural climatic suitability theory is used to assess demand for agricultural climatic resources in Northeast China during the cultivation of spring maize.Three indices,i.e.,an average resource suitability index （Isr）,an average efficacy suitability index （Ise）,and an average resource utilization index （K）,are defined to quantitatively evaluate the effects of climate change on climatic resource utilization between 1951 and 2100.These indices change significantly in both temporal and spatial dimensions in Northeast China under global warming.All three indices are projected to decrease in Liaoning Province from 1951 to 2100,with particularly sharp declines in Isr,Ise,and K after 2030,2021,and 2011,respectively.In Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces,Isr is projected to increase slightly after 2011,while Ise increases slightly and K decreases slightly after 2030.The spatial maxima of all three indices are projected to shift northeastward.Overall,warming of the climate in Northeast China is expected to negatively impact spring maize production,especially in Liaoning Province.Spring maize cultivation will likely need to shift northward and expand eastward to make efficient use of future agricultural climatic resources.
