选择中外图书馆学典型期刊近10年的数据,从引用量和类型、高被引文献、高被引作者及同被引、引用半衰期等方面比较分析中外图书馆学学者引证行为得出:中外图书馆学论文篇均引用量呈递增趋势;期刊、图书、网络文献是中外图书馆学学者主...选择中外图书馆学典型期刊近10年的数据,从引用量和类型、高被引文献、高被引作者及同被引、引用半衰期等方面比较分析中外图书馆学学者引证行为得出:中外图书馆学论文篇均引用量呈递增趋势;期刊、图书、网络文献是中外图书馆学学者主要引用文献来源;国内高被引文献中图书占大多数,国外则是期刊;《中国图书馆学报》和College and Research Libraries分别是中外图书馆学学者引用最多的期刊;国内图书馆学高被引作者是张晓林、吴慰慈等学者,国外则是著名团体作者和Hernon、Davis等学者;国外图书馆学学者引用的内容侧重图书馆服务,国内则关注图书馆学基础理论;国外图书馆学引文半衰期比国内长,但国内引文半衰期较国外稳定。展开更多
The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplem...The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplementary perspective for citation analysis in three theoretical aspects, which are influence dimension, discipline difference and behavioral motive. Based on 166,767 articles in physics, computer science, economics, and Library and Information Science included by SCI and SSCI in 2013 as research samples, this paper conducts an exploratory investigation into the measurement features of the usage data. According to the results, compared with citation data, usage is more discriminative and sensitive. In terms of distribution, usage presents an approximate and positively skewed distribution at high-frequency. An approximate power-law distribution is observed in the cumulative integral. The evaluation result of usage is independent to a certain degree and poses no essential opposition to the result of citation. Although the usage of the Wo S platform still has the limitations of generality, falsifiability and isolation, usage may be accepted as one of the possible options that supplement citation data and provide a richer field of vision for influence evaluation. There are 4 figures, 6 tables and 23 references in this paper.展开更多
文摘选择中外图书馆学典型期刊近10年的数据,从引用量和类型、高被引文献、高被引作者及同被引、引用半衰期等方面比较分析中外图书馆学学者引证行为得出:中外图书馆学论文篇均引用量呈递增趋势;期刊、图书、网络文献是中外图书馆学学者主要引用文献来源;国内高被引文献中图书占大多数,国外则是期刊;《中国图书馆学报》和College and Research Libraries分别是中外图书馆学学者引用最多的期刊;国内图书馆学高被引作者是张晓林、吴慰慈等学者,国外则是著名团体作者和Hernon、Davis等学者;国外图书馆学学者引用的内容侧重图书馆服务,国内则关注图书馆学基础理论;国外图书馆学引文半衰期比国内长,但国内引文半衰期较国外稳定。
基金the youth project“The Mechanism and Empirical Study of h-Type Information Network Measures”(No.71503083) supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
文摘The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplementary perspective for citation analysis in three theoretical aspects, which are influence dimension, discipline difference and behavioral motive. Based on 166,767 articles in physics, computer science, economics, and Library and Information Science included by SCI and SSCI in 2013 as research samples, this paper conducts an exploratory investigation into the measurement features of the usage data. According to the results, compared with citation data, usage is more discriminative and sensitive. In terms of distribution, usage presents an approximate and positively skewed distribution at high-frequency. An approximate power-law distribution is observed in the cumulative integral. The evaluation result of usage is independent to a certain degree and poses no essential opposition to the result of citation. Although the usage of the Wo S platform still has the limitations of generality, falsifiability and isolation, usage may be accepted as one of the possible options that supplement citation data and provide a richer field of vision for influence evaluation. There are 4 figures, 6 tables and 23 references in this paper.
