Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN) is a frequent chronic complication of diabetes mellitus with potentially life-threatening outcomes. CAN is caused by the impairment of the autonomic nerve fibers regulating heart rate...Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN) is a frequent chronic complication of diabetes mellitus with potentially life-threatening outcomes. CAN is caused by the impairment of the autonomic nerve fibers regulating heart rate, cardiac output, myocardial contractility, cardiac electrophysiology and blood vessel constriction anddilatation. It causes a wide range of cardiac disorders, including resting tachycardia, arrhythmias, intraoperative cardiovascular instability, asymptomatic myocardial ischemia and infarction and increased rate of mortality after myocardial infarction. Etiological factors associated with autonomic neuropathy include insufficient glycemic control, a longer period since the onset of diabetes, increased age, female sex and greater body mass index. The most commonly used methods for the diagnosis of CAN are based upon the assessment of heart rate variability(the physiological variation in the time interval between heartbeats), as it is one of the first findings in both clinically asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Clinical symptoms associated with CAN generally occur late in the disease process and include early fatigue and exhaustion during exercise, orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, presyncope and syncope. Treatment is based on early diagnosis, life style changes, optimization of glycemic control and management of cardiovascular risk factors. Medical therapies, including aldose reductase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, prostoglandin analogs and alpha-lipoic acid, have been found to be effective in randomized controlled trials. The following article includes the epidemiology, clinical findings and cardiovascular consequences, diagnosis, and approaches to prevention and treatment of CAN.展开更多
Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN)is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus(DM)that is strongly associated with approximately five-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.CAN manifests in a spectrum of thi...Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN)is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus(DM)that is strongly associated with approximately five-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.CAN manifests in a spectrum of things,ranging from resting tachycardia and fixed heart rate(HR)to development of"silent"myocardial infarction.Clinical correlates or risk markers for CAN are age,DM duration,glycemic control,hypertension,and dyslipidemia(DLP),development of other microvascular complications.Established risk factors for CAN are poor glycemic control in type 1 DM and a combination of hypertension,DLP,obesity,and unsatisfactory glycemic control in type 2DM.Symptomatic manifestations of CAN include sinus tachycardia,exercise intolerance,orthostatic hypotension(OH),abnormal blood pressure(BP)regulation,dizziness,presyncope and syncope,intraoperative cardiovascular instability,asymptomatic myocardial ischemia and infarction.Methods of CAN assessment in clinical practice include assessment of symptoms and signs,cardiovascular reflex tests based on HR and BP,short-term electrocardiography(ECG),QT interval prolongation,HR variability(24 h,classic24 h Holter ECG),ambulatory BP monitoring,HR turbulence,baroreflex sensitivity,muscle sympathetic nerve activity,catecholamine assessment and cardiovascular sympathetic tests,heart sympathetic imaging.Although it is common complication,the significance of CAN has not been fully appreciated and there are no unified treatment algorithms for today.Treatment is based on early diagnosis,life style changes,optimization of glycemic control and management of cardiovascular risk factors.Pathogenetic treatment of CAN includes:Balanced diet and physical activity;optimization of glycemic control;treatment of DLP;antioxidants,first of allα-lipoic acid(ALA),aldose reductase inhibitors,acetylL-carnitine;vitamins,first of all fat-soluble vitamin B1;correction of vascular endothelial dysfunction;prevention and treatment of thrombosis;in severe cases-treatment of OH.The promising methods include prescri展开更多
目的分析2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者心脏自主神经病变的相关危险因素。方法采取随机抽样法选择2020年2—12月于上海中医药大学附属上海市中西医结合医院内分泌科住院的154例T2DM患者作为研究对象,患者均接受心血管反射试验,以心血管反射试验...目的分析2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者心脏自主神经病变的相关危险因素。方法采取随机抽样法选择2020年2—12月于上海中医药大学附属上海市中西医结合医院内分泌科住院的154例T2DM患者作为研究对象,患者均接受心血管反射试验,以心血管反射试验为诊断糖尿病心脏自主神经病变(DCAN)的金标准,分为DCAN组和无DCAN组,同时记录患者一般资料及生化指标等,分析DCAN的相关危险因素及对DCAN发生发展的预测价值。结果154例T2DM患者中,DCAN患者101例,无DCAN患者53例,DCAN发生率为65.6%(101/154)。两组间年龄、糖尿病病程比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),DCAN组糖尿病周围神经病变比例、胱抑素C(CysC)水平高于无DCAN组[75.25%(76/101)比56.60%(30/53),0.87(0.78,0.99)mg/L比0.79(0.73,0.92)mg/L](χ^(2)=5.632,P=0.018;Z=2.808,P=0.005),空腹C肽(FCP)低于无DCAN组[(1.86±0.95)μg/L比(2.34±1.12)μg/L](t=2.817,P=0.005)。两组性别、高血压比例、体质指数、总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、肿瘤坏死因子-α、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、糖化血红蛋白、血肌酐、尿酸、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示:Hcy、2 h PG、FCP均为DCAN的独立影响因素(OR=1.272,95%CI 1.078~1.501;OR=1.098,95%CI 1.003~1.201;OR=0.528,95%CI 0.335~0.832,P<0.05或P<0.01)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,Hcy、2 h PG、FCP的曲线下面积分别为0.574、0.564、0.627。结论Hcy、2 h PG、FCP均为DCAN的独立影响因素,三者AUC面积均处于0.5~0.7,对诊断DCAN具有一定预测价值。展开更多
AIM: To investigate autonomic nervous function in patients with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).METHODS: The investigation was performed on 29patients(14 men), aged 18-80 years(51.14 ± 18.34)...AIM: To investigate autonomic nervous function in patients with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).METHODS: The investigation was performed on 29patients(14 men), aged 18-80 years(51.14 ± 18.34),who were referred to our Neurocardiology Laboratory at the Clinical and Hospital Center "Bezanijska Kosa"with a diagnosis of GERD. One hundred sixteen healthy volunteers matched in age and sex with the examinees served as the control group. The study protocol included the evaluation of autonomic function and hemodynamic status, short-term heart rate variability(HRV) analysis, 24 h ambulatory ECG monitoring with long-term HRV analysis and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.RESULTS: Pathologic results of cardiovascular reflex test were more common among patients with reflux compared to the control group. Severe autonomic dysfunction was detected in 44.4% of patients and in7.9% of controls(P < 0.001). Parameters of short-term analysis of RR variability, which are the indicators ofvagal activity, had lower values in patients with GERD than in the control group. Long-term HRV analysis of time-domain parameters indicated lower values in patients with reflux disease when compared to the control group. Power spectral analysis of long-term HRV revealed lower low- and high-frequency values.Detailed 24 h ambulatory blood pressure analysis showed significantly higher values of systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure in the reflux group than in the control group.CONCLUSION: Patients with GERD have distortion of sympathetic and parasympathetic components of the autonomic nervous system, but impaired parasympathetic function appears more congruent to GERD.展开更多
文摘Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN) is a frequent chronic complication of diabetes mellitus with potentially life-threatening outcomes. CAN is caused by the impairment of the autonomic nerve fibers regulating heart rate, cardiac output, myocardial contractility, cardiac electrophysiology and blood vessel constriction anddilatation. It causes a wide range of cardiac disorders, including resting tachycardia, arrhythmias, intraoperative cardiovascular instability, asymptomatic myocardial ischemia and infarction and increased rate of mortality after myocardial infarction. Etiological factors associated with autonomic neuropathy include insufficient glycemic control, a longer period since the onset of diabetes, increased age, female sex and greater body mass index. The most commonly used methods for the diagnosis of CAN are based upon the assessment of heart rate variability(the physiological variation in the time interval between heartbeats), as it is one of the first findings in both clinically asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Clinical symptoms associated with CAN generally occur late in the disease process and include early fatigue and exhaustion during exercise, orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, presyncope and syncope. Treatment is based on early diagnosis, life style changes, optimization of glycemic control and management of cardiovascular risk factors. Medical therapies, including aldose reductase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, prostoglandin analogs and alpha-lipoic acid, have been found to be effective in randomized controlled trials. The following article includes the epidemiology, clinical findings and cardiovascular consequences, diagnosis, and approaches to prevention and treatment of CAN.
文摘Cardiac autonomic neuropathy(CAN)is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus(DM)that is strongly associated with approximately five-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.CAN manifests in a spectrum of things,ranging from resting tachycardia and fixed heart rate(HR)to development of"silent"myocardial infarction.Clinical correlates or risk markers for CAN are age,DM duration,glycemic control,hypertension,and dyslipidemia(DLP),development of other microvascular complications.Established risk factors for CAN are poor glycemic control in type 1 DM and a combination of hypertension,DLP,obesity,and unsatisfactory glycemic control in type 2DM.Symptomatic manifestations of CAN include sinus tachycardia,exercise intolerance,orthostatic hypotension(OH),abnormal blood pressure(BP)regulation,dizziness,presyncope and syncope,intraoperative cardiovascular instability,asymptomatic myocardial ischemia and infarction.Methods of CAN assessment in clinical practice include assessment of symptoms and signs,cardiovascular reflex tests based on HR and BP,short-term electrocardiography(ECG),QT interval prolongation,HR variability(24 h,classic24 h Holter ECG),ambulatory BP monitoring,HR turbulence,baroreflex sensitivity,muscle sympathetic nerve activity,catecholamine assessment and cardiovascular sympathetic tests,heart sympathetic imaging.Although it is common complication,the significance of CAN has not been fully appreciated and there are no unified treatment algorithms for today.Treatment is based on early diagnosis,life style changes,optimization of glycemic control and management of cardiovascular risk factors.Pathogenetic treatment of CAN includes:Balanced diet and physical activity;optimization of glycemic control;treatment of DLP;antioxidants,first of allα-lipoic acid(ALA),aldose reductase inhibitors,acetylL-carnitine;vitamins,first of all fat-soluble vitamin B1;correction of vascular endothelial dysfunction;prevention and treatment of thrombosis;in severe cases-treatment of OH.The promising methods include prescri
文摘目的分析2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者心脏自主神经病变的相关危险因素。方法采取随机抽样法选择2020年2—12月于上海中医药大学附属上海市中西医结合医院内分泌科住院的154例T2DM患者作为研究对象,患者均接受心血管反射试验,以心血管反射试验为诊断糖尿病心脏自主神经病变(DCAN)的金标准,分为DCAN组和无DCAN组,同时记录患者一般资料及生化指标等,分析DCAN的相关危险因素及对DCAN发生发展的预测价值。结果154例T2DM患者中,DCAN患者101例,无DCAN患者53例,DCAN发生率为65.6%(101/154)。两组间年龄、糖尿病病程比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),DCAN组糖尿病周围神经病变比例、胱抑素C(CysC)水平高于无DCAN组[75.25%(76/101)比56.60%(30/53),0.87(0.78,0.99)mg/L比0.79(0.73,0.92)mg/L](χ^(2)=5.632,P=0.018;Z=2.808,P=0.005),空腹C肽(FCP)低于无DCAN组[(1.86±0.95)μg/L比(2.34±1.12)μg/L](t=2.817,P=0.005)。两组性别、高血压比例、体质指数、总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、肿瘤坏死因子-α、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、糖化血红蛋白、血肌酐、尿酸、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示:Hcy、2 h PG、FCP均为DCAN的独立影响因素(OR=1.272,95%CI 1.078~1.501;OR=1.098,95%CI 1.003~1.201;OR=0.528,95%CI 0.335~0.832,P<0.05或P<0.01)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,Hcy、2 h PG、FCP的曲线下面积分别为0.574、0.564、0.627。结论Hcy、2 h PG、FCP均为DCAN的独立影响因素,三者AUC面积均处于0.5~0.7,对诊断DCAN具有一定预测价值。
文摘AIM: To investigate autonomic nervous function in patients with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).METHODS: The investigation was performed on 29patients(14 men), aged 18-80 years(51.14 ± 18.34),who were referred to our Neurocardiology Laboratory at the Clinical and Hospital Center "Bezanijska Kosa"with a diagnosis of GERD. One hundred sixteen healthy volunteers matched in age and sex with the examinees served as the control group. The study protocol included the evaluation of autonomic function and hemodynamic status, short-term heart rate variability(HRV) analysis, 24 h ambulatory ECG monitoring with long-term HRV analysis and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.RESULTS: Pathologic results of cardiovascular reflex test were more common among patients with reflux compared to the control group. Severe autonomic dysfunction was detected in 44.4% of patients and in7.9% of controls(P < 0.001). Parameters of short-term analysis of RR variability, which are the indicators ofvagal activity, had lower values in patients with GERD than in the control group. Long-term HRV analysis of time-domain parameters indicated lower values in patients with reflux disease when compared to the control group. Power spectral analysis of long-term HRV revealed lower low- and high-frequency values.Detailed 24 h ambulatory blood pressure analysis showed significantly higher values of systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure in the reflux group than in the control group.CONCLUSION: Patients with GERD have distortion of sympathetic and parasympathetic components of the autonomic nervous system, but impaired parasympathetic function appears more congruent to GERD.
