AIM To systematically search literature and determine a preferable surgical procedure in patients with failed conservative treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.METHODS The electronic online databases MED...AIM To systematically search literature and determine a preferable surgical procedure in patients with failed conservative treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.METHODS The electronic online databases MEDLINE(through PubMed), EMBASE(through OVID), CINAHL(through EBSCO), Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched in May 2016. Eligible for inclusion were all available studies with level Ⅱ and level Ⅲ evidence(LoE). Data was assessed and extracted by two independent review authors using a specifically for this study designed data extraction form.RESULTS Six studies(294 surgically treated shoulders) were included in this review. No significant differences between the three available treatment options(acromioplasty with the removal of the calcific deposits, acromioplasty or solely the removal of the calcific deposits) were detected regarding the functional and clinical outcome. The followup ranged from 12 mo to 5 years. Complication rates were low. No reoperations were necessary and the only reported complication was adhesive capsulitis, which in all cases could be treated conservatively with full recovery. CONCLUSION We found that all three available treatment options show good functional and clinical outcomes in the short and midterm. However, a favorable procedure is difficult to determine due to the lack of high-quality comparing studies.展开更多
目的比较肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期手术治疗与非手术治疗的效果。方法回顾分析同济大学附属东方医院自2012年3月—2021年6月门诊或住院处置的33例肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期患者(女21例,男12例)。随机分成手术组与非手术治疗组(口服药物...目的比较肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期手术治疗与非手术治疗的效果。方法回顾分析同济大学附属东方医院自2012年3月—2021年6月门诊或住院处置的33例肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期患者(女21例,男12例)。随机分成手术组与非手术治疗组(口服药物治疗组),手术组15例记录术前、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS评分),肩关节病例行肩关节功能评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon s Form,ASES);非手术组18例记录就诊当天、治疗后的VAS评分,对两组进行ASES评分。结果两组VAS评分术前(8.68±0.48)分,就诊当天(8.38±0.50)分;术后第1天为(3.85±0.31)分,治疗后第1天(6.68±0.82)分;术后2周为(2.06±0.21)分,治疗后第2周(3.98±1.21)分。ASES评分术前(19.03±2.17)分,就诊当天(21.75±4.95)分;术后2周为(85.78±3.00)分,治疗后第2周(81.15±2.46)分,两组治疗后两周的VAS评分及ASES评分均较治疗前明显改善,而手术组改善更明显。结论钙化性肌腱炎急性期患者发病有性别差异,微创手术治疗恢复更快。展开更多
目的:比较痛点触摸下放血疗法与超声引导下穿刺减压两种方法治疗急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎的疗效。方法:2020年1月至2023年1月,选取我科收治的45例急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎患者,分成治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组22例,女16例,男6例;年龄20~64(...目的:比较痛点触摸下放血疗法与超声引导下穿刺减压两种方法治疗急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎的疗效。方法:2020年1月至2023年1月,选取我科收治的45例急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎患者,分成治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组22例,女16例,男6例;年龄20~64(39.31±5.80)岁;左侧11例,右侧11例;采用超声引导下穿刺减压治疗。对照组23例,女15例,男8例;年龄19~66(40.67±6.13)岁;左侧12例,右侧11例;采用痛点触摸下放血疗法治疗。分别于治疗前、治疗后1周及治疗后1、3、6个月,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS),美国加州大学肩关节系统(University of California,Los Angeles,UCLA)评分,肩关节Constant-Murley评分,对治疗效果进行评估。结果:对照组1例,治疗1周后因个人原因放弃随访,其余44例完成全部随访,治疗后6个月,两组患者均未出现复发病例。治疗组和对照组治疗后各时间段的VAS、UCLA、Constant-Murley评分与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:痛点触摸下放血疗法与超声引导下穿刺减压两种方法治疗急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎均疗效明显,操作简单、费用低廉,能够有效减轻局部疼痛,有效改善肩关节功能,基层医院可根据自身情况选择性操作治疗。展开更多
文摘AIM To systematically search literature and determine a preferable surgical procedure in patients with failed conservative treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder.METHODS The electronic online databases MEDLINE(through PubMed), EMBASE(through OVID), CINAHL(through EBSCO), Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched in May 2016. Eligible for inclusion were all available studies with level Ⅱ and level Ⅲ evidence(LoE). Data was assessed and extracted by two independent review authors using a specifically for this study designed data extraction form.RESULTS Six studies(294 surgically treated shoulders) were included in this review. No significant differences between the three available treatment options(acromioplasty with the removal of the calcific deposits, acromioplasty or solely the removal of the calcific deposits) were detected regarding the functional and clinical outcome. The followup ranged from 12 mo to 5 years. Complication rates were low. No reoperations were necessary and the only reported complication was adhesive capsulitis, which in all cases could be treated conservatively with full recovery. CONCLUSION We found that all three available treatment options show good functional and clinical outcomes in the short and midterm. However, a favorable procedure is difficult to determine due to the lack of high-quality comparing studies.
文摘目的比较肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期手术治疗与非手术治疗的效果。方法回顾分析同济大学附属东方医院自2012年3月—2021年6月门诊或住院处置的33例肩关节钙化性肌腱炎急性期患者(女21例,男12例)。随机分成手术组与非手术治疗组(口服药物治疗组),手术组15例记录术前、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS评分),肩关节病例行肩关节功能评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon s Form,ASES);非手术组18例记录就诊当天、治疗后的VAS评分,对两组进行ASES评分。结果两组VAS评分术前(8.68±0.48)分,就诊当天(8.38±0.50)分;术后第1天为(3.85±0.31)分,治疗后第1天(6.68±0.82)分;术后2周为(2.06±0.21)分,治疗后第2周(3.98±1.21)分。ASES评分术前(19.03±2.17)分,就诊当天(21.75±4.95)分;术后2周为(85.78±3.00)分,治疗后第2周(81.15±2.46)分,两组治疗后两周的VAS评分及ASES评分均较治疗前明显改善,而手术组改善更明显。结论钙化性肌腱炎急性期患者发病有性别差异,微创手术治疗恢复更快。
文摘目的:比较痛点触摸下放血疗法与超声引导下穿刺减压两种方法治疗急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎的疗效。方法:2020年1月至2023年1月,选取我科收治的45例急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎患者,分成治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组22例,女16例,男6例;年龄20~64(39.31±5.80)岁;左侧11例,右侧11例;采用超声引导下穿刺减压治疗。对照组23例,女15例,男8例;年龄19~66(40.67±6.13)岁;左侧12例,右侧11例;采用痛点触摸下放血疗法治疗。分别于治疗前、治疗后1周及治疗后1、3、6个月,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS),美国加州大学肩关节系统(University of California,Los Angeles,UCLA)评分,肩关节Constant-Murley评分,对治疗效果进行评估。结果:对照组1例,治疗1周后因个人原因放弃随访,其余44例完成全部随访,治疗后6个月,两组患者均未出现复发病例。治疗组和对照组治疗后各时间段的VAS、UCLA、Constant-Murley评分与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:痛点触摸下放血疗法与超声引导下穿刺减压两种方法治疗急性冈上肌钙化性肌腱炎均疗效明显,操作简单、费用低廉,能够有效减轻局部疼痛,有效改善肩关节功能,基层医院可根据自身情况选择性操作治疗。
