[目的]比较颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术(One-door open Laminoplasty,Lam组)和颈后路椎板切除减压内固定术(lamninectomy with implant fixation,LIF组)术后轴性疼痛发生情况。[方法]回顾性纳入接受Lam(n=74)和LIF术式(n=51)的病例,比...[目的]比较颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术(One-door open Laminoplasty,Lam组)和颈后路椎板切除减压内固定术(lamninectomy with implant fixation,LIF组)术后轴性疼痛发生情况。[方法]回顾性纳入接受Lam(n=74)和LIF术式(n=51)的病例,比较两组病例轴性疼痛发生情况、神经功能改善率(improvement rate of neurological function,IR)及颈部功能障碍指数(neck dysfunction index,NDI)改善率的差异,分析轴性疼痛对神经功能、颈部功能障碍的影响。[结果]Lam组病例的轴性疼痛发生率、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和疼痛完全缓解所需时间均明显低于LIF组病例(P<0.05)。两组病例术前神经功能和NDI均无明显差别(P>0.05),分别随访29.4个月和33.1个月后(P>0.05),两组病例IR无明显差别(P>0.05),LIF组NDI改善率显著低于Lam组(P<0.05)。相关性分析提示轴性疼痛的发生与否和IR、NDI改善率均无明显相关性(P>0.05)。[结论]接受Lam术式的病例轴性疼痛发生率、疼痛评分和完全缓解所需时间均明显低于接受LIF术式的病例,且颈部功能障碍恢复情况优于后者。展开更多
Objective:To compare the clinical effect differences of biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical Jiājǐ(夹脊EX-B2)acupoint and simple acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 for axial pain after cervic...Objective:To compare the clinical effect differences of biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical Jiājǐ(夹脊EX-B2)acupoint and simple acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 for axial pain after cervical laminectomy with implant fixation(LIF)operation.Methods:A total of 80 patients with axial pain after cervical LIF operation were randomly assigned into the biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 group(Group A)and the acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 group(Group B),and 40 patients in each group.The group A was treated by biān(砭)stone hot compress and acupuncture at cervical EX-B2,while the group B was treated by acupuncture at cervical EX-B2.Both of groups were treated once a day,one course of treatment consisted of 7 days,6-day treatment plus 1-day rest,and there were 3 courses of treatment in total.The pain score(Visual analogue scale,VAS),neck dysfunction indices(NDI),and serum creatine phosphokinase(CPK)levels of patients were compared before and after the treatment,and their clinical effects were evaluated.Results:The VAS score,NDI,and CPK in patients of the two groups after treatment were all lower than those before treatment(all P<0.05),and the indicators in the group A after treatment were all lower than those in the group B after treatment(all P<0.05).The effective rate in the group A was 92.5%,higher than that(77.5%)in the group B,and there was statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusions:The biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 acupoint was better than acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 alone in treatment of axial pain after cervical LIF operation.In the group A,therapeutic effects were improved by relieving pain,improving neck function,and repairing muscle injury.展开更多
文摘[目的]比较颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术(One-door open Laminoplasty,Lam组)和颈后路椎板切除减压内固定术(lamninectomy with implant fixation,LIF组)术后轴性疼痛发生情况。[方法]回顾性纳入接受Lam(n=74)和LIF术式(n=51)的病例,比较两组病例轴性疼痛发生情况、神经功能改善率(improvement rate of neurological function,IR)及颈部功能障碍指数(neck dysfunction index,NDI)改善率的差异,分析轴性疼痛对神经功能、颈部功能障碍的影响。[结果]Lam组病例的轴性疼痛发生率、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和疼痛完全缓解所需时间均明显低于LIF组病例(P<0.05)。两组病例术前神经功能和NDI均无明显差别(P>0.05),分别随访29.4个月和33.1个月后(P>0.05),两组病例IR无明显差别(P>0.05),LIF组NDI改善率显著低于Lam组(P<0.05)。相关性分析提示轴性疼痛的发生与否和IR、NDI改善率均无明显相关性(P>0.05)。[结论]接受Lam术式的病例轴性疼痛发生率、疼痛评分和完全缓解所需时间均明显低于接受LIF术式的病例,且颈部功能障碍恢复情况优于后者。
文摘Objective:To compare the clinical effect differences of biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical Jiājǐ(夹脊EX-B2)acupoint and simple acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 for axial pain after cervical laminectomy with implant fixation(LIF)operation.Methods:A total of 80 patients with axial pain after cervical LIF operation were randomly assigned into the biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 group(Group A)and the acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 group(Group B),and 40 patients in each group.The group A was treated by biān(砭)stone hot compress and acupuncture at cervical EX-B2,while the group B was treated by acupuncture at cervical EX-B2.Both of groups were treated once a day,one course of treatment consisted of 7 days,6-day treatment plus 1-day rest,and there were 3 courses of treatment in total.The pain score(Visual analogue scale,VAS),neck dysfunction indices(NDI),and serum creatine phosphokinase(CPK)levels of patients were compared before and after the treatment,and their clinical effects were evaluated.Results:The VAS score,NDI,and CPK in patients of the two groups after treatment were all lower than those before treatment(all P<0.05),and the indicators in the group A after treatment were all lower than those in the group B after treatment(all P<0.05).The effective rate in the group A was 92.5%,higher than that(77.5%)in the group B,and there was statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusions:The biān(砭)stone hot compress combined with acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 acupoint was better than acupuncture at cervical EX-B2 alone in treatment of axial pain after cervical LIF operation.In the group A,therapeutic effects were improved by relieving pain,improving neck function,and repairing muscle injury.
