Objective:To examine differences in outcomes of semi-rigid ureteroscopy(URS)with or without a modified-ureteral-access-sheath(mUAS)to treat large upper ureteral stones.Methods:Patients with single,radio-opaque large u...Objective:To examine differences in outcomes of semi-rigid ureteroscopy(URS)with or without a modified-ureteral-access-sheath(mUAS)to treat large upper ureteral stones.Methods:Patients with single,radio-opaque large upper ureteral stone(≥10 mm)treated using semi-rigid URS between August 2013 and October 2016 were retrospectively evaluated.The stone-free status was determined from Kidney-ureter-bladder(KUB)X-ray films taken on postoperative Day 1 and after 1 month.Results:Of 103 patients meeting inclusion criteria,43(41.75%)and 60(58.25%)were treated with semi-rigid URS with and without mUAS,respectively.The immediate stone-free rate(SFR)for the mUAS group was significantly higher than the non-mUAS group(40[93.0%]vs.46[76.7%];p=0.033).The SFR at 1 month was also high for patients treated using mUAS,but not statistically different from patients not treated with mUAS(41[95.3%]mUAS vs.51[85.0%]non-mUAS;p=0.115).Auxiliary procedure rates were significantly lower for mUAS patients compared to non-mUAS patients(2[4.7%]vs.14[23.3%];p=0.01).There were no significant differences in surgical duration and hospital stays,and the overall complication rates were statistically similar for mUAS patients compared to non-mUAS patients(1[2.3%]vs.3[5.0%];p=0.638).展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the effect of ureteral access sheath(UAS)use and calibration change on stone-free rate and complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS).Methods:Data from 568 patients undergoing RIRS for ...Objective:To evaluate the effect of ureteral access sheath(UAS)use and calibration change on stone-free rate and complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS).Methods:Data from 568 patients undergoing RIRS for kidney or upper ureteral stones were retrospectively included.Firstly,patients were compared after 1:1 propensity score matching,according to UAS usage during RIRS(UAS used[+]87 and UAS non-used[−]87 patients).Then all UAS+patients(n=481)were subdivided according to UAS calibration:9.5-11.5 Fr,10-12 Fr,11-13 Fr,and 13-15 Fr.Primary outcomes of the study were the success and complications of RIRS.Results:Stone-free rate of UAS+patients(86.2%)was significantly higher than UAS−patients(70.1%)after propensity score matching(p=0.01).Stone-free rate increased with higher caliber UAS(9.5-11.5 Fr:66.7%;10-12 Fr:87.0%;11-13 Fr:90.6%;13-15 Fr:100%;p<0.001).Postoperative complications of UAS+patients(11.5%)were significantly lower than UAS−patients(27.6%)(p=0.01).Complications(8.7%)with 9.5-11.5 Fr UAS was lower than thicker UAS(17.2%)but was not statistically significant(p=0.09).UAS usage was an independent factor predicting stone-free status or peri-and post-operative complications(odds ratio[OR]3.654,95%confidence interval[CI]1.314-10.162;OR 4.443,95%CI 1.350-14.552;OR 4.107,95%CI 1.366-12.344,respectively).Conclusion:Use of UAS in RIRS may increase stone-free rates,which also increase with higher caliber UAS.UAS usage may reduce complications;however,complications seemingly increase with higher UAS calibration.展开更多
BACKGROUND Retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS)has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment modality in large-scale quantitative studies.However,although its safety profile has been established,it also has a po...BACKGROUND Retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS)has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment modality in large-scale quantitative studies.However,although its safety profile has been established,it also has a potential risk of life-threatening complications.We here describe our experience with a patient who developed a huge periureteral hematoma after RIRS with holmium laser lithotripsy.CASE SUMMARY A 73-year-old woman visited our center with a complaint of gross hematuria.An enhanced computed tomography(CT)scan revealed a 1.5-cm left renal pelvis stone with hydronephrosis.The patient underwent RIRS.During the surgery,a 12/14-Fr ureteral access sheath was applied and a 6-Fr ureteral catheter was indwelled thereafter.On postoperative day 1,she experienced aggravated left flank pain and left lower-quadrant tenderness without rebound tenderness.A follow-up CT scan was taken,which revealed a huge hematoma in the periureteral space,not in the perirenal space,with suspicious contrast medium extravasation.Immediate angiography was performed;however,it showed no evidence of active bleeding.She was conservatively managed with hydration and antibiotic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy,and was discharged on postoperative day 7.However,she visited our outpatient department with recurrent left flank pain at 5 d from discharge.Ultrasonography confirmed that the double J-stent was intact.To rule out stent malfunction,the stent was changed.Decreased size of the hematoma was observed in the imaging studies,and conservative management for candiduria was performed for 1 wk.CONCLUSION Although RIRS is an effective and safe procedure for the management of renal stones,clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.展开更多
基金This work was financed by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81370804 and No.81670643)Guangzhou Science,Technology and Innovation Commission(No.201604020001,No.201607010162 and No.201704020193).
文摘Objective:To examine differences in outcomes of semi-rigid ureteroscopy(URS)with or without a modified-ureteral-access-sheath(mUAS)to treat large upper ureteral stones.Methods:Patients with single,radio-opaque large upper ureteral stone(≥10 mm)treated using semi-rigid URS between August 2013 and October 2016 were retrospectively evaluated.The stone-free status was determined from Kidney-ureter-bladder(KUB)X-ray films taken on postoperative Day 1 and after 1 month.Results:Of 103 patients meeting inclusion criteria,43(41.75%)and 60(58.25%)were treated with semi-rigid URS with and without mUAS,respectively.The immediate stone-free rate(SFR)for the mUAS group was significantly higher than the non-mUAS group(40[93.0%]vs.46[76.7%];p=0.033).The SFR at 1 month was also high for patients treated using mUAS,but not statistically different from patients not treated with mUAS(41[95.3%]mUAS vs.51[85.0%]non-mUAS;p=0.115).Auxiliary procedure rates were significantly lower for mUAS patients compared to non-mUAS patients(2[4.7%]vs.14[23.3%];p=0.01).There were no significant differences in surgical duration and hospital stays,and the overall complication rates were statistically similar for mUAS patients compared to non-mUAS patients(1[2.3%]vs.3[5.0%];p=0.638).
文摘Objective:To evaluate the effect of ureteral access sheath(UAS)use and calibration change on stone-free rate and complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS).Methods:Data from 568 patients undergoing RIRS for kidney or upper ureteral stones were retrospectively included.Firstly,patients were compared after 1:1 propensity score matching,according to UAS usage during RIRS(UAS used[+]87 and UAS non-used[−]87 patients).Then all UAS+patients(n=481)were subdivided according to UAS calibration:9.5-11.5 Fr,10-12 Fr,11-13 Fr,and 13-15 Fr.Primary outcomes of the study were the success and complications of RIRS.Results:Stone-free rate of UAS+patients(86.2%)was significantly higher than UAS−patients(70.1%)after propensity score matching(p=0.01).Stone-free rate increased with higher caliber UAS(9.5-11.5 Fr:66.7%;10-12 Fr:87.0%;11-13 Fr:90.6%;13-15 Fr:100%;p<0.001).Postoperative complications of UAS+patients(11.5%)were significantly lower than UAS−patients(27.6%)(p=0.01).Complications(8.7%)with 9.5-11.5 Fr UAS was lower than thicker UAS(17.2%)but was not statistically significant(p=0.09).UAS usage was an independent factor predicting stone-free status or peri-and post-operative complications(odds ratio[OR]3.654,95%confidence interval[CI]1.314-10.162;OR 4.443,95%CI 1.350-14.552;OR 4.107,95%CI 1.366-12.344,respectively).Conclusion:Use of UAS in RIRS may increase stone-free rates,which also increase with higher caliber UAS.UAS usage may reduce complications;however,complications seemingly increase with higher UAS calibration.
文摘BACKGROUND Retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS)has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment modality in large-scale quantitative studies.However,although its safety profile has been established,it also has a potential risk of life-threatening complications.We here describe our experience with a patient who developed a huge periureteral hematoma after RIRS with holmium laser lithotripsy.CASE SUMMARY A 73-year-old woman visited our center with a complaint of gross hematuria.An enhanced computed tomography(CT)scan revealed a 1.5-cm left renal pelvis stone with hydronephrosis.The patient underwent RIRS.During the surgery,a 12/14-Fr ureteral access sheath was applied and a 6-Fr ureteral catheter was indwelled thereafter.On postoperative day 1,she experienced aggravated left flank pain and left lower-quadrant tenderness without rebound tenderness.A follow-up CT scan was taken,which revealed a huge hematoma in the periureteral space,not in the perirenal space,with suspicious contrast medium extravasation.Immediate angiography was performed;however,it showed no evidence of active bleeding.She was conservatively managed with hydration and antibiotic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy,and was discharged on postoperative day 7.However,she visited our outpatient department with recurrent left flank pain at 5 d from discharge.Ultrasonography confirmed that the double J-stent was intact.To rule out stent malfunction,the stent was changed.Decreased size of the hematoma was observed in the imaging studies,and conservative management for candiduria was performed for 1 wk.CONCLUSION Although RIRS is an effective and safe procedure for the management of renal stones,clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.
