期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
GRACE/GOCE扩展重力场模型确定我国1985高程基准重力位的精度分析 被引量:9
1
作者 赫林 褚永海 +1 位作者 徐新禹 张腾旭 《地球物理学报》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第6期2016-2026,共11页
高精度高程基准重力位的确定往往依赖于高精度全球重力场模型,其对全球和区域高程基准的高精度统一非常关键,GRACE、GOCE卫星重力计划极大地提高了全球重力场模型中长波的精度.本文首先对GRACE/GOCE卫星重力场模型的内符合和外符合精度... 高精度高程基准重力位的确定往往依赖于高精度全球重力场模型,其对全球和区域高程基准的高精度统一非常关键,GRACE、GOCE卫星重力计划极大地提高了全球重力场模型中长波的精度.本文首先对GRACE/GOCE卫星重力场模型的内符合和外符合精度进行讨论分析,结果说明卫星重力模型的截断误差影响可达到分米级水平,在确定高程基准重力位时该影响不可忽略.利用EGM2008模型扩展GRACE/GOCE卫星重力场模型至2190阶,可有效减弱卫星重力模型的截断误差影响,但不同模型扩展时的最优拼接阶次不同,其中DIR-1、DIR-5模型对应的最优拼接阶次分别为180阶和220阶,以GPS水准数据检验,扩展模型在中国区域的精度均优于18cm.最后,基于最优拼接阶次获得的扩展重力场模型对我国1985高程基准重力位进行了估计,DIR-5和TIM-5模型对应数值分别为62636853.47m^2·s^-2和62636853.49m^2·s^-2,精度均为1.51m^2·s^-2;发现在中国区域模型大地水准面与GPS/水准数据的差值存在微弱的系统性倾斜,东西向倾斜约为9cm,南北向倾斜约为1.4cm,考虑倾斜改正后基于DIR-5和TIM-5模型估计我国1985高程基准重力位的精度提高了0.16m^2·s^-2. 展开更多
关键词 GRACE/GOCE重力场模型 GPS/水准 截断阶次 倾斜 高程基准重力位
下载PDF
Evaluation of the geopotential value W_0^(LVD) of China 被引量:1
2
作者 Lin He Yonghai Chu Nan Yu 《Geodesy and Geodynamics》 2017年第6期408-412,共5页
Estimation of the zero-height geopotential value W_0^(LVD) for the CVD(China Vertical Datum) plays a fundamental role in the connection of traditional height reference systems into a global height system.Estimatio... Estimation of the zero-height geopotential value W_0^(LVD) for the CVD(China Vertical Datum) plays a fundamental role in the connection of traditional height reference systems into a global height system.Estimation the W_0^(LVD) of China is based on the computation of the mean geopotential offset between the value W_0= 62636856.0 m^2 s^(-2), selected as reference in this study, and the unknown geopotential value W_0^(LVD). This estimation is based on the combination of ellipsoidal heights, levelled heights(referring to the CVD), and some physical parameters, such as geopotential values, gravity values, and geoid undulations.The geoid undulations derived from the GGM(Global Geopotential Models). This combination is performed through three approaches: The first one is based on the theory of Molodensky, and the second one compares levelled heights and geopotential values derived from the GGMs, while the third one analyses the differences between GPS/Levelling and GGMs geoid undulations. The approaches are evaluated at 65 benchmarks(BMs) covered around Qingdao where the tide gauge is used to observe the local mean sea level of China. The results from three approaches are very similar. Furthermore, the W_0^(LVD)determined for the China local vertical datum was 62636852.9462 m^2 s^(-2), indicates a bias of about3.0538 m^2/s^(-2) compared to the conventional value of 62636856.0 m^2 s^(-2). 展开更多
关键词 Global geopotential models GPS/Levelling BMs hina vertical datum Local vertical datum Zero-height geopotential
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部