目的在国内首次将老年综合评估用于心脏康复及老年瓣膜病评估中,探讨老年综合评估在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者心脏康复中的应用价值.方法应用老年综合评估指标初次评估43例拟行TAVR的患者,老年综合评估包括一般情况、认知功能、...目的在国内首次将老年综合评估用于心脏康复及老年瓣膜病评估中,探讨老年综合评估在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者心脏康复中的应用价值.方法应用老年综合评估指标初次评估43例拟行TAVR的患者,老年综合评估包括一般情况、认知功能、营养状态、活动能力、精神心理问题、虚弱程度、中医症状评分、左手及右手握力和5 m步行试验.患者完成第1次老年综合评估后,即启动心脏康复,包括术前预康复、术后住院期间及出院后康复指导,并采用中西医结合方法.心脏康复治疗后1个月常规随访,比较心脏康复前后各指标差异.结果 43例患者中,简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)评分(25.44±2.26)分,轻度及以上认知功能障碍占60.47%;老年人微型营养评定量表评分(22.49±3.54)分,存在营养不良风险或营养不良占62.79%;Barthel指数评分(84.65±14.24)分,存在日常生活活动能力异常占93.02%;虚弱程度评分(2.89±0.99)分,明显虚弱占76.74%.33例患者心脏康复中,治疗后存在营养不良风险比例显著低于治疗前(24.2% vs 60.6%,P=0.006);虚弱程度评分[(1.50±0.97)分vs(3.17±1.00)分,P=0.000]和明显虚弱比例降低(33.3% vs 72.7%,P=0.003).患者心脏康复治疗后较治疗前MMSE评分和握力增加,焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表评分降低,差异虽无统计学意义(P>0.05),但各项均有不同程度改善.结论老年综合评估可作为TAVR患者心脏康复的指导依据,以提高活动能力、调节情绪、预防患者认知功能下降,改善虚弱程度,并可作为心脏康复的效果评价指标.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Current data is lacking about the progression of ascending aortic dilatation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) in aortic stenosis(AS) patients with bicuspid aortic valve(BAV) and tricuspid...BACKGROUND: Current data is lacking about the progression of ascending aortic dilatation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) in aortic stenosis(AS) patients with bicuspid aortic valve(BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve(TAV). This study aims to assess the ascending aortic dilatation rate(mm/year) after TAVR in patients with BAV versus TAV using a multidetector computed tomography(MDCT) fol ow-up and to determine the predictors of ascending aortic dilatation rate.METHODS: Severe AS patients undergoing TAVR from March 2013 to March 2018 at our center with MDCT follow-ups were included. BAV and TAV were identified using baseline MDCT. Baseline and follow-up MDCT images were analyzed,and the diameters of ascending aorta were measured. Study end point is ascending aortic dilatation rate(mm/year). Furthermore,factors predicting ascending aortic dilatation rate were also investigated.RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were included,comprised of 86 BAV and 122 TAV patients. Five,4,3,2,and 1-year MDCT follow-ups were achieved in 7,9,30,46,and 116 patients. The ascending aortic diameter was significantly increased after TAVR in both BAV group(43.7±4.4 mm vs. 44.0±4.5 mm;P<0.001) and TAV group(39.1±4.8 mm vs. 39.7±5.1 mm;P<0.001). However,no difference of ascending aortic dilatation rate was found between BAV and TAV group(0.2±0.8 mm/year vs. 0.3±0.8 mm/year,P=0.592). Multivariate linear regression revealed paravalvular leakage(PVL) grade was independently associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in the whole population and BAV group,but not TAV group. No aortic events occurred during follow-ups.CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic size continues to grow after TAVR in BAV patients,but the dilatation rate is mild and comparable to that of TAV patients. PVL grade is associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in BAV patients post-TAVR.展开更多
文摘目的在国内首次将老年综合评估用于心脏康复及老年瓣膜病评估中,探讨老年综合评估在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者心脏康复中的应用价值.方法应用老年综合评估指标初次评估43例拟行TAVR的患者,老年综合评估包括一般情况、认知功能、营养状态、活动能力、精神心理问题、虚弱程度、中医症状评分、左手及右手握力和5 m步行试验.患者完成第1次老年综合评估后,即启动心脏康复,包括术前预康复、术后住院期间及出院后康复指导,并采用中西医结合方法.心脏康复治疗后1个月常规随访,比较心脏康复前后各指标差异.结果 43例患者中,简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)评分(25.44±2.26)分,轻度及以上认知功能障碍占60.47%;老年人微型营养评定量表评分(22.49±3.54)分,存在营养不良风险或营养不良占62.79%;Barthel指数评分(84.65±14.24)分,存在日常生活活动能力异常占93.02%;虚弱程度评分(2.89±0.99)分,明显虚弱占76.74%.33例患者心脏康复中,治疗后存在营养不良风险比例显著低于治疗前(24.2% vs 60.6%,P=0.006);虚弱程度评分[(1.50±0.97)分vs(3.17±1.00)分,P=0.000]和明显虚弱比例降低(33.3% vs 72.7%,P=0.003).患者心脏康复治疗后较治疗前MMSE评分和握力增加,焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表评分降低,差异虽无统计学意义(P>0.05),但各项均有不同程度改善.结论老年综合评估可作为TAVR患者心脏康复的指导依据,以提高活动能力、调节情绪、预防患者认知功能下降,改善虚弱程度,并可作为心脏康复的效果评价指标.
基金supported by the Advanced Technique Research of Valvular Heart Disease Treatment Project(2015C03028)Role of TPP1 in anti-senescence and functional optimization of aged mesenchymal stem cells(81570233)+2 种基金Zhejiang Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease(2018E50002)Role of FAIM in survival and functional improvement for aged mesenchymal stem cells(81770253)Zhejiang Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascularand Cerebrovascular Disease(2018E50002)
文摘BACKGROUND: Current data is lacking about the progression of ascending aortic dilatation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) in aortic stenosis(AS) patients with bicuspid aortic valve(BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve(TAV). This study aims to assess the ascending aortic dilatation rate(mm/year) after TAVR in patients with BAV versus TAV using a multidetector computed tomography(MDCT) fol ow-up and to determine the predictors of ascending aortic dilatation rate.METHODS: Severe AS patients undergoing TAVR from March 2013 to March 2018 at our center with MDCT follow-ups were included. BAV and TAV were identified using baseline MDCT. Baseline and follow-up MDCT images were analyzed,and the diameters of ascending aorta were measured. Study end point is ascending aortic dilatation rate(mm/year). Furthermore,factors predicting ascending aortic dilatation rate were also investigated.RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were included,comprised of 86 BAV and 122 TAV patients. Five,4,3,2,and 1-year MDCT follow-ups were achieved in 7,9,30,46,and 116 patients. The ascending aortic diameter was significantly increased after TAVR in both BAV group(43.7±4.4 mm vs. 44.0±4.5 mm;P<0.001) and TAV group(39.1±4.8 mm vs. 39.7±5.1 mm;P<0.001). However,no difference of ascending aortic dilatation rate was found between BAV and TAV group(0.2±0.8 mm/year vs. 0.3±0.8 mm/year,P=0.592). Multivariate linear regression revealed paravalvular leakage(PVL) grade was independently associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in the whole population and BAV group,but not TAV group. No aortic events occurred during follow-ups.CONCLUSION: Ascending aortic size continues to grow after TAVR in BAV patients,but the dilatation rate is mild and comparable to that of TAV patients. PVL grade is associated with ascending aortic dilatation rate in BAV patients post-TAVR.
