OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a Chinese herbal suppository(Jianpi suppository) and Western Medicine(mesalazine) on hemorheology and CD62p in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).METHODS: In a randomized trial, ...OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a Chinese herbal suppository(Jianpi suppository) and Western Medicine(mesalazine) on hemorheology and CD62p in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).METHODS: In a randomized trial, 120 mild to moderate UC patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. The Jianpi suppository group used Chinese herbal suppository rectally, while the mesalazine group was treated with mesalazine tablets orally. Two 15-day courses of treatment were carried out in both groups. Changes in the hemorheology and CD62p indices in patients were observed.RESULTS: The hemorheology and CD62p indices in the Jianpi suppository group decreased significantly more than those of the mesalazine group.CONCLUSION: Jianpi suppository is effective in improving the hypercoagulability of UC patients, and therefore may be worth using in clinical practice.展开更多
目的观察美沙拉秦栓1次/d与2次/d给药治疗轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎的疗效及安全性。方法本试验为随机、非劣效性研究。选取2013年10月—2015年6月济南军区总医院符合纳入与排除标准的轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎患者82例,采用随机数字表...目的观察美沙拉秦栓1次/d与2次/d给药治疗轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎的疗效及安全性。方法本试验为随机、非劣效性研究。选取2013年10月—2015年6月济南军区总医院符合纳入与排除标准的轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎患者82例,采用随机数字表将其分为A组(n=41)和B组(n=41)。A组给予美沙拉秦栓1.0g/次,晚睡前便后纳肛,1次/d;B组给予美沙拉秦栓0.5 g/次,便后纳肛,早、晚各1次。两组均给药8周。采用疾病活动指数(DAI)评价疾病活动程度。以治疗第8周时DAI评分作为主要疗效指标;以治疗第8周时DAI各分项评分(大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、总体评价)及临床缓解率作为次要疗效指标,并记录两组不良反应发生情况。结果患者均完成8周治疗。两组治疗前后DAI评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);两组间治疗前及治疗第8周DAI评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组治疗第8周时DAI评分-B组治疗第8周时DAI评分(U1-U2)双侧95%可信区间(-0.33,0.87)的下限>-1.00,拒绝无效假设,认为A组的疗效不差于B组。两组治疗8周后大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、整体评价评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前和治疗第8周,两组间大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、整体评价评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经过8周治疗后,A、B两组临床缓解率分别为95.1%(39/41)、90.2%(37/41),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.719,P=0.396)。A组不良反应发生率为48.8%(20/41),B组不良反应发生率为61.0%(25/41),差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.231,P=0.267)。结论在8周的临床试验中,美沙拉秦栓1.0 g 1次/d给药与0.5 g 2次/d给药治疗轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎疗效一致,且安全。展开更多
Mesalamine suppositories have been used widely for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and considered to be safer than systemic administration for its limited systemic absorption.However,previous studies have s...Mesalamine suppositories have been used widely for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and considered to be safer than systemic administration for its limited systemic absorption.However,previous studies have shown that mesalamine suppository occasionally causes severe hypersensitivity reactions including fever,rashes,colitis exacerbation and acute eosinophilic pneumonia.Here we present a 25-year-old woman with ulcerative colitis with bloody diarrhea accompanied by abdominal pain and fever which were aggravated after introduction of mesalamine suppositories.In light of symptom exacerbation of ulcerative colitis,increased inflammatory injury of colon mucosa shown by colonoscopy and elevated peripheral eosinophil count after mesalamine suppositories administration,and the Naranjo algorithm score of 10,the possibility of hypersensitivity reaction to mesalamine suppositories should be considered,warning us to be aware of this potential reaction after administration of mesalamine formulations even if it is the suppositories.展开更多
文摘OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a Chinese herbal suppository(Jianpi suppository) and Western Medicine(mesalazine) on hemorheology and CD62p in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).METHODS: In a randomized trial, 120 mild to moderate UC patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. The Jianpi suppository group used Chinese herbal suppository rectally, while the mesalazine group was treated with mesalazine tablets orally. Two 15-day courses of treatment were carried out in both groups. Changes in the hemorheology and CD62p indices in patients were observed.RESULTS: The hemorheology and CD62p indices in the Jianpi suppository group decreased significantly more than those of the mesalazine group.CONCLUSION: Jianpi suppository is effective in improving the hypercoagulability of UC patients, and therefore may be worth using in clinical practice.
文摘目的观察美沙拉秦栓1次/d与2次/d给药治疗轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎的疗效及安全性。方法本试验为随机、非劣效性研究。选取2013年10月—2015年6月济南军区总医院符合纳入与排除标准的轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎患者82例,采用随机数字表将其分为A组(n=41)和B组(n=41)。A组给予美沙拉秦栓1.0g/次,晚睡前便后纳肛,1次/d;B组给予美沙拉秦栓0.5 g/次,便后纳肛,早、晚各1次。两组均给药8周。采用疾病活动指数(DAI)评价疾病活动程度。以治疗第8周时DAI评分作为主要疗效指标;以治疗第8周时DAI各分项评分(大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、总体评价)及临床缓解率作为次要疗效指标,并记录两组不良反应发生情况。结果患者均完成8周治疗。两组治疗前后DAI评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);两组间治疗前及治疗第8周DAI评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组治疗第8周时DAI评分-B组治疗第8周时DAI评分(U1-U2)双侧95%可信区间(-0.33,0.87)的下限>-1.00,拒绝无效假设,认为A组的疗效不差于B组。两组治疗8周后大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、整体评价评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前和治疗第8周,两组间大便次数、大便带血、黏膜炎症、整体评价评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经过8周治疗后,A、B两组临床缓解率分别为95.1%(39/41)、90.2%(37/41),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.719,P=0.396)。A组不良反应发生率为48.8%(20/41),B组不良反应发生率为61.0%(25/41),差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.231,P=0.267)。结论在8周的临床试验中,美沙拉秦栓1.0 g 1次/d给药与0.5 g 2次/d给药治疗轻中度活动期溃疡性直肠炎疗效一致,且安全。
文摘Mesalamine suppositories have been used widely for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and considered to be safer than systemic administration for its limited systemic absorption.However,previous studies have shown that mesalamine suppository occasionally causes severe hypersensitivity reactions including fever,rashes,colitis exacerbation and acute eosinophilic pneumonia.Here we present a 25-year-old woman with ulcerative colitis with bloody diarrhea accompanied by abdominal pain and fever which were aggravated after introduction of mesalamine suppositories.In light of symptom exacerbation of ulcerative colitis,increased inflammatory injury of colon mucosa shown by colonoscopy and elevated peripheral eosinophil count after mesalamine suppositories administration,and the Naranjo algorithm score of 10,the possibility of hypersensitivity reaction to mesalamine suppositories should be considered,warning us to be aware of this potential reaction after administration of mesalamine formulations even if it is the suppositories.
