The Baumann Skin Typing System diagnoses patients as having one of 16 skin types based on their answers to a validated questionnaire [i] known as the Baumann Skin Type Indicator [ii]. The BSTI questionnaire has been t...The Baumann Skin Typing System diagnoses patients as having one of 16 skin types based on their answers to a validated questionnaire [i] known as the Baumann Skin Type Indicator [ii]. The BSTI questionnaire has been tested over the last decade on over 200,000 people of various ages and ethnicities in different geographic locations around the world. In this study, data were collected from 52,862 patients to compare skin type prevalence between those who presented to doctor’s offices and those who took the quiz without supervision online. The most common skin types varied only slightly between patients that took the quiz online and those that completed the questionnaire in their doctor’s office. This indicates that the prevalence of skin types seen in the doctor’s office is similar to that in the general population and that supervision is not necessary to get an accurate result on the BSTI. [iii] In addition, comparison of data gathered in China, Korea, and the US did not show a significant difference in skin type prevalence between Asian and Caucasian skin types. [iv] This study demonstrates that the English version of the BSTI is valid for English speaking patients online, and in doctors’ offices in the US, China and Korea.展开更多
目的探讨基于中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表构建的急诊分诊信息系统在急诊分诊中的应用效果。方法以中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表(Taiwan Triage And Acuity Scale,TTAS)为基础,研究制订了四级急诊分诊标准及急诊分诊信息系统,...目的探讨基于中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表构建的急诊分诊信息系统在急诊分诊中的应用效果。方法以中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表(Taiwan Triage And Acuity Scale,TTAS)为基础,研究制订了四级急诊分诊标准及急诊分诊信息系统,自2013年1月开始运用于急诊分诊工作。分别在2011年5月和2013年5月调查了急诊分诊信息系统使用前后接诊的急诊患者各1300例。比较两组评估分诊所需时间(从分诊人员接诊急诊患者至评估结束,挂上分级标记的时间)和分诊准确率。结果基于该标准的分诊信息系统使用至2013年底,共处理患者信息15余万条;使用前后,分诊准确率明显提高(P<0.001)、评估分诊所需时间明显缩短(P<0.001);分诊信息报表及图形规范美观且便于查询。结论分诊信息系统的设计与应用,实现了急诊分诊信息化和智能化,提高了急诊分诊工作的质量,保证了急诊患者的生命安全。展开更多
文摘The Baumann Skin Typing System diagnoses patients as having one of 16 skin types based on their answers to a validated questionnaire [i] known as the Baumann Skin Type Indicator [ii]. The BSTI questionnaire has been tested over the last decade on over 200,000 people of various ages and ethnicities in different geographic locations around the world. In this study, data were collected from 52,862 patients to compare skin type prevalence between those who presented to doctor’s offices and those who took the quiz without supervision online. The most common skin types varied only slightly between patients that took the quiz online and those that completed the questionnaire in their doctor’s office. This indicates that the prevalence of skin types seen in the doctor’s office is similar to that in the general population and that supervision is not necessary to get an accurate result on the BSTI. [iii] In addition, comparison of data gathered in China, Korea, and the US did not show a significant difference in skin type prevalence between Asian and Caucasian skin types. [iv] This study demonstrates that the English version of the BSTI is valid for English speaking patients online, and in doctors’ offices in the US, China and Korea.
文摘目的探讨基于中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表构建的急诊分诊信息系统在急诊分诊中的应用效果。方法以中国台湾急诊检伤与急迫度分级量表(Taiwan Triage And Acuity Scale,TTAS)为基础,研究制订了四级急诊分诊标准及急诊分诊信息系统,自2013年1月开始运用于急诊分诊工作。分别在2011年5月和2013年5月调查了急诊分诊信息系统使用前后接诊的急诊患者各1300例。比较两组评估分诊所需时间(从分诊人员接诊急诊患者至评估结束,挂上分级标记的时间)和分诊准确率。结果基于该标准的分诊信息系统使用至2013年底,共处理患者信息15余万条;使用前后,分诊准确率明显提高(P<0.001)、评估分诊所需时间明显缩短(P<0.001);分诊信息报表及图形规范美观且便于查询。结论分诊信息系统的设计与应用,实现了急诊分诊信息化和智能化,提高了急诊分诊工作的质量,保证了急诊患者的生命安全。
