目的对比分析同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期手术与分期手术切除转移灶的疗效。方法通过计算机文献检索ISI Web of Knowledge、Pubmed及中国期刊网,检索国内外自1990年1月至2010年12月间公开发表的有关结直肠癌肝转移治疗的文章。通过Meta...目的对比分析同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期手术与分期手术切除转移灶的疗效。方法通过计算机文献检索ISI Web of Knowledge、Pubmed及中国期刊网,检索国内外自1990年1月至2010年12月间公开发表的有关结直肠癌肝转移治疗的文章。通过Meta分析对比同时性结直肠癌肝转移同期、分期术后围手术期并发症、死亡率、5年生存率。结果同时性结直肠癌肝转移同期手术切除组与分期手术切除组比较,同期手术组围手术期并发症发生率36.4%与分期手术组35.6%(P=0.957)相似,在围手术期死亡率(OR=1.91,95%CI:0.90～4.08,P=0.09)及5年生存率(OR=1.08,CI:0.73～1.61,P=0.69)方面无统计学差异。结论与分期切除相比,同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期切除同样安全、有效。展开更多
AIM: To offer an up-to-date review of all availabletreatment strategies for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases(CLM).METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles rela...AIM: To offer an up-to-date review of all availabletreatment strategies for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases(CLM).METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles related to the management of patients with synchronous CLM. A search of the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted in September 2014.The following search terms were used: synchronous colorectal liver metastases, surgery, stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer, liver-first approach, and up-front hepatectomy.These terms were employed in various combinations to maximize the search. Only articles written in English were included. Particular attention was devoted to studies and review articles that were published within the last six years(2009-2014). Additional searches of the cited references from primary articles were performed to further improve the review. The full texts of all relevant articles were accessed by two independent reviewers.RESULTS: Poor long-term outcomes of patients with synchronous CLM managed by a traditional treatment strategy have led to questions about the timing and sequence of possible therapeutic interventions. Thus,alternative paradigms called reverse strategies have been proposed. Presently, there are four treatment strategies available:(1) primary first approach(or traditional approach) comprises resection of the primary colorectal tumor followed by chemotherapy;subsequent liver resection is performed 3-6 mo after colorectal resection(provided that CLM are still resectable);(2) simultaneous resection of the primary colorectal tumor and CLM during a single operation presents intriguing options for a highly select group of patients, which can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity;(3) liver-first(or chemotherapy-first) approach comprises preoperative chemotherapy(3-6 cycles) followed by liver resection,adjuvant chemotherapy, and resection of the primary colorectal tumor(it is best suited for patients withasymptomatic primary tumors and initiall展开更多
Objective： The safety of the simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases （SCRLM） is still being debated. However, this simultaneous operative approach is more commonly adopted at presen...Objective： The safety of the simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases （SCRLM） is still being debated. However, this simultaneous operative approach is more commonly adopted at present than in the past. Therefore, we compared simultaneous hepatic resection with delayed hepatic resection in this study.Methods： All patients with SCRLM diagnosed before initial treatment between January 2009 and September 2013 were retrospectively included in our study. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared in patients who underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection and those treated by delayed hepatectomy.Results： Among the 73 patients diagnosed with SCRLM, simultaneous coloreetal and hepatic resection was performed in 60 patients （82.2%）, while delayed hepatic resection was performed in 13 patients （17.8%）. The mortality rate was zero. The postoperative complication rate after delayed resection was higher than, but not significantly different from, that after simultaneous resection （46% vs. 23%, P=0.166）. The duration of operating time （240 vs. 420 min, P〈0.05） and postoperative hospital stay time （11 vs. 18 days, P〈0.05） were shorter in the simultaneous resection group. After the initial treatments were given, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates in the simultaneous resection group were 77%, 59%, and 53%, respectively, whereas those in the delayed resection group were 67%, 42%, and 10%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate in the simultaneous resection group was 23%; overall survival differed significantly between the two groups （P=0.037）. Median disease-free survival （DFS） times were 19.1 months in the simultaneous resection group and 8.8 months in the delayed resection group. DFS differed significantly between the two groups. Coenclusions： Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection is safe and exhibits advantages in the longtime survival of patients.展开更多
Background： The liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer （CRC） metastases. Their removal is a critical and challenging aspect of CRC treatment. We investigated the prognosis and risk factors of patients ...Background： The liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer （CRC） metastases. Their removal is a critical and challenging aspect of CRC treatment. We investigated the prognosis and risk factors of patients with CRC and liver metastases （CRCLM） who underwent simultaneous resections for both lesions. Methods： From January 2009 to August 2016, 102 patients with CRCLM received simultaneous resections of CRCLM at our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical data and analyzed their outcomes. Overall survival （OS） and disease-free survival （DFS） were examined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Results： Median follow-up time was 22.7 months： no perioperative death or serious complications were observed. Median OS was 55.5 months： postoperative OS rates were l-year： 93.8%, 3-year： 60.7%, and 5-year： 46.4%. Median DFS was 9.0 months; postoperative DFS rates were l-year： 43.1%, 3-year： 23.0%, and 5-year 21.1%. Independent risk factors found in multivariate analysis included carcinoembryonic antigen 〉100 ng/ml, no adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor thrombus in liver metastases, and bilobar liver metastases for OS; age 〉60 years, no adjuvant chenlotherapy, multiple metastases, and largest diameter ≥3 cm for DFS. Conclusions： Simultaneous surgical resection is a safe and effective treatment for patients with synchronous CRC LM. The main prognostic factors are pathological characteristics of liver metastases and whether standard adjuvant chemotherapy is performed.展开更多
目的结直肠癌同时肝转移患者行同期切除围术期采用快速康复理念的临床效果。方法将2010-01至2016-12北京大学肿瘤医院共76例同期行原发灶切除与肝切除患者随机分为快速康复外科(Enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)组和传统康复组,每...目的结直肠癌同时肝转移患者行同期切除围术期采用快速康复理念的临床效果。方法将2010-01至2016-12北京大学肿瘤医院共76例同期行原发灶切除与肝切除患者随机分为快速康复外科(Enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)组和传统康复组,每组38例,分别实施快速康复理念及常规康复理念。观察两组间首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间、住院时间、并发症发生率及再次入院率之间的差异。结果术后首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间及住院时间,ERAS组分别为(3.12±1.03)d、(5.63±1.37)d、(9.20±1.36)d,传统康复组分别为(4.67±1.57)d、(7.87±1.62)d、(11.36±1.74)d,ERAS组各项天数短于传统康复组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);而并发症总发病率、再次入院率,ERAS组分别为4(10.5%)、3(7.9%),传统康复组分别为3(7.9%)、2(5.3%),两组比较无明显增加(P>0.05)。结论快速康复理念应用于结直肠癌同时性肝转移同期切除围手术期康复具有良好的临床效果,值得推广应用。展开更多
文摘目的对比分析同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期手术与分期手术切除转移灶的疗效。方法通过计算机文献检索ISI Web of Knowledge、Pubmed及中国期刊网,检索国内外自1990年1月至2010年12月间公开发表的有关结直肠癌肝转移治疗的文章。通过Meta分析对比同时性结直肠癌肝转移同期、分期术后围手术期并发症、死亡率、5年生存率。结果同时性结直肠癌肝转移同期手术切除组与分期手术切除组比较,同期手术组围手术期并发症发生率36.4%与分期手术组35.6%(P=0.957)相似,在围手术期死亡率(OR=1.91,95%CI:0.90～4.08,P=0.09)及5年生存率(OR=1.08,CI:0.73～1.61,P=0.69)方面无统计学差异。结论与分期切除相比,同时性结直肠癌肝转移行同期切除同样安全、有效。
文摘AIM: To offer an up-to-date review of all availabletreatment strategies for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases(CLM).METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles related to the management of patients with synchronous CLM. A search of the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted in September 2014.The following search terms were used: synchronous colorectal liver metastases, surgery, stage Ⅳ colorectal cancer, liver-first approach, and up-front hepatectomy.These terms were employed in various combinations to maximize the search. Only articles written in English were included. Particular attention was devoted to studies and review articles that were published within the last six years(2009-2014). Additional searches of the cited references from primary articles were performed to further improve the review. The full texts of all relevant articles were accessed by two independent reviewers.RESULTS: Poor long-term outcomes of patients with synchronous CLM managed by a traditional treatment strategy have led to questions about the timing and sequence of possible therapeutic interventions. Thus,alternative paradigms called reverse strategies have been proposed. Presently, there are four treatment strategies available:(1) primary first approach(or traditional approach) comprises resection of the primary colorectal tumor followed by chemotherapy;subsequent liver resection is performed 3-6 mo after colorectal resection(provided that CLM are still resectable);(2) simultaneous resection of the primary colorectal tumor and CLM during a single operation presents intriguing options for a highly select group of patients, which can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity;(3) liver-first(or chemotherapy-first) approach comprises preoperative chemotherapy(3-6 cycles) followed by liver resection,adjuvant chemotherapy, and resection of the primary colorectal tumor(it is best suited for patients withasymptomatic primary tumors and initiall
基金supported by the National High-Tech R&D Program (863 Program) of China (2015AA020408)the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201967, 31470073)+2 种基金the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7132193, 7144238)the Capital Health Research and Development of Special (2014-1-4022)Beijing Nova Program (No.2009A69)
文摘Objective： The safety of the simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases （SCRLM） is still being debated. However, this simultaneous operative approach is more commonly adopted at present than in the past. Therefore, we compared simultaneous hepatic resection with delayed hepatic resection in this study.Methods： All patients with SCRLM diagnosed before initial treatment between January 2009 and September 2013 were retrospectively included in our study. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared in patients who underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection and those treated by delayed hepatectomy.Results： Among the 73 patients diagnosed with SCRLM, simultaneous coloreetal and hepatic resection was performed in 60 patients （82.2%）, while delayed hepatic resection was performed in 13 patients （17.8%）. The mortality rate was zero. The postoperative complication rate after delayed resection was higher than, but not significantly different from, that after simultaneous resection （46% vs. 23%, P=0.166）. The duration of operating time （240 vs. 420 min, P〈0.05） and postoperative hospital stay time （11 vs. 18 days, P〈0.05） were shorter in the simultaneous resection group. After the initial treatments were given, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates in the simultaneous resection group were 77%, 59%, and 53%, respectively, whereas those in the delayed resection group were 67%, 42%, and 10%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate in the simultaneous resection group was 23%; overall survival differed significantly between the two groups （P=0.037）. Median disease-free survival （DFS） times were 19.1 months in the simultaneous resection group and 8.8 months in the delayed resection group. DFS differed significantly between the two groups. Coenclusions： Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resection is safe and exhibits advantages in the longtime survival of patients.
文摘Background： The liver is the most common site for colorectal cancer （CRC） metastases. Their removal is a critical and challenging aspect of CRC treatment. We investigated the prognosis and risk factors of patients with CRC and liver metastases （CRCLM） who underwent simultaneous resections for both lesions. Methods： From January 2009 to August 2016, 102 patients with CRCLM received simultaneous resections of CRCLM at our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical data and analyzed their outcomes. Overall survival （OS） and disease-free survival （DFS） were examined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Results： Median follow-up time was 22.7 months： no perioperative death or serious complications were observed. Median OS was 55.5 months： postoperative OS rates were l-year： 93.8%, 3-year： 60.7%, and 5-year： 46.4%. Median DFS was 9.0 months; postoperative DFS rates were l-year： 43.1%, 3-year： 23.0%, and 5-year 21.1%. Independent risk factors found in multivariate analysis included carcinoembryonic antigen 〉100 ng/ml, no adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor thrombus in liver metastases, and bilobar liver metastases for OS; age 〉60 years, no adjuvant chenlotherapy, multiple metastases, and largest diameter ≥3 cm for DFS. Conclusions： Simultaneous surgical resection is a safe and effective treatment for patients with synchronous CRC LM. The main prognostic factors are pathological characteristics of liver metastases and whether standard adjuvant chemotherapy is performed.
文摘目的结直肠癌同时肝转移患者行同期切除围术期采用快速康复理念的临床效果。方法将2010-01至2016-12北京大学肿瘤医院共76例同期行原发灶切除与肝切除患者随机分为快速康复外科(Enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)组和传统康复组,每组38例,分别实施快速康复理念及常规康复理念。观察两组间首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间、住院时间、并发症发生率及再次入院率之间的差异。结果术后首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间及住院时间,ERAS组分别为(3.12±1.03)d、(5.63±1.37)d、(9.20±1.36)d,传统康复组分别为(4.67±1.57)d、(7.87±1.62)d、(11.36±1.74)d,ERAS组各项天数短于传统康复组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);而并发症总发病率、再次入院率,ERAS组分别为4(10.5%)、3(7.9%),传统康复组分别为3(7.9%)、2(5.3%),两组比较无明显增加(P>0.05)。结论快速康复理念应用于结直肠癌同时性肝转移同期切除围手术期康复具有良好的临床效果,值得推广应用。
