AIM： To identity the factors influencing colorectal cancer （CRC） screening behavior and willingness among Chinese outpatients.METHODS： An outpatient-based face-to-face survey was conducted from August 18 to Septem...AIM： To identity the factors influencing colorectal cancer （CRC） screening behavior and willingness among Chinese outpatients.METHODS： An outpatient-based face-to-face survey was conducted from August 18 to September 7, 2010 in Changhai Hospital. A total of 1200 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years were recruited for interview. The patient＇s knowledge about CRC and screening was pre-measured as a predictor variable, and other pre- dictors included age, gender, educational level, month- ly household income and health insurance status. The relationship between these predictors and screening behavior, screening willingness and screening approach were examined using Pearson＇s 2 test and logistic regression analyses.RESULTS： Of these outpatients, 22.5% had undergone CRC screening prior to this study. Patients who had participated in the screening were more likely to have good knowledge about CRC and screening （OR： 5.299, 95% CI： 3.415-8.223）, have health insurance （OR： 1.996, 95% CI： 1.426-2.794） and older in age. Higher income, however, was found to be a barrier to the screening （OR： 0.633, 95% CI： 0.467-0.858）. An analysis of screening willingness showed that 37.5% of the patients would voluntarily participated in a screen at the recommended age, but 41.3% would do so under doctor＇s advice. Screening willingness was positively correlated with the patient＇s knowledge sta- tus. Patients with higher knowledge levels would like to participate in the screening （OR： 4.352, 95% CI： 3.008-6.298）, and they would select colonoscopy as a screening approach （OR： 3.513, 95% CI： 2.290-5.389）. However, higher income level was, again, a bar- rier to colonoscopic screening （OR： 0.667, 95% CI： 0.505-0.908）. CONCLUSION： Patient＇s level of knowledge and in-ome should be taken into consideration when conducting a feasible CRC screening.展开更多
目的构建基于拓展平行过程理论(extended parallel process model,EPPM)的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案。方法2023年3—11月,在文献回顾和小组讨论的基础上形成基于EPPM理论的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案初稿,采用...目的构建基于拓展平行过程理论(extended parallel process model,EPPM)的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案。方法2023年3—11月,在文献回顾和小组讨论的基础上形成基于EPPM理论的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案初稿,采用德尔菲专家函询法对18名专家进行2轮函询,形成干预方案终稿。结果2轮专家函询共构建2个一级指标、4个二级指标和27个三级指标的筛查干预方案。专家权威系数分别为0.822、0.884;2轮函询的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.176、0.373,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论构建的基于EPPM理论的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案具有可靠性和实用性,以期为胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预提供借鉴依据。展开更多
文摘AIM： To identity the factors influencing colorectal cancer （CRC） screening behavior and willingness among Chinese outpatients.METHODS： An outpatient-based face-to-face survey was conducted from August 18 to September 7, 2010 in Changhai Hospital. A total of 1200 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years were recruited for interview. The patient＇s knowledge about CRC and screening was pre-measured as a predictor variable, and other pre- dictors included age, gender, educational level, month- ly household income and health insurance status. The relationship between these predictors and screening behavior, screening willingness and screening approach were examined using Pearson＇s 2 test and logistic regression analyses.RESULTS： Of these outpatients, 22.5% had undergone CRC screening prior to this study. Patients who had participated in the screening were more likely to have good knowledge about CRC and screening （OR： 5.299, 95% CI： 3.415-8.223）, have health insurance （OR： 1.996, 95% CI： 1.426-2.794） and older in age. Higher income, however, was found to be a barrier to the screening （OR： 0.633, 95% CI： 0.467-0.858）. An analysis of screening willingness showed that 37.5% of the patients would voluntarily participated in a screen at the recommended age, but 41.3% would do so under doctor＇s advice. Screening willingness was positively correlated with the patient＇s knowledge sta- tus. Patients with higher knowledge levels would like to participate in the screening （OR： 4.352, 95% CI： 3.008-6.298）, and they would select colonoscopy as a screening approach （OR： 3.513, 95% CI： 2.290-5.389）. However, higher income level was, again, a bar- rier to colonoscopic screening （OR： 0.667, 95% CI： 0.505-0.908）. CONCLUSION： Patient＇s level of knowledge and in-ome should be taken into consideration when conducting a feasible CRC screening.
文摘目的构建基于拓展平行过程理论(extended parallel process model,EPPM)的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案。方法2023年3—11月,在文献回顾和小组讨论的基础上形成基于EPPM理论的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案初稿,采用德尔菲专家函询法对18名专家进行2轮函询,形成干预方案终稿。结果2轮专家函询共构建2个一级指标、4个二级指标和27个三级指标的筛查干预方案。专家权威系数分别为0.822、0.884;2轮函询的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.176、0.373,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论构建的基于EPPM理论的胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预方案具有可靠性和实用性,以期为胃癌患者一级亲属胃癌筛查行为干预提供借鉴依据。
