Background:Both portal vein embolization(PVE)and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)have merits and demerits when used in patients with unresectable liver cancers due to ...Background:Both portal vein embolization(PVE)and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)have merits and demerits when used in patients with unresectable liver cancers due to insufficient volumes in future liver remnant(FLR).Methods:This study was a single-center,prospective randomized comparative study.Patients with the diagnosis of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 2 groups.The primary endpoints were tumor resection and three-year overall survival(OS)rates.Results:Between November 2014 to June 2016,76 patients with unresectable HBV-related HCC due to inadequate volume of FLR were randomly assigned to ALPPS groups(n=38)and TACE+PVE groups(n=38).Thirty-seven patients(97.4%)in the ALPPS group compared with 25 patients(65.8%)in the TACE+PVE group were able to undergo staged hepatectomy(risk ratio 1.48,95%CI:1.17-1.87,P<0.001).The three-year OS rate of the ALPPS group(65.8%)(95%CI:50.7-80.9)was significantly better than the TACE+PVE group(42.1%)(95%CI:26.4-57.8)(HR 0.50,95%CI:0.26-0.98,two-sided P=0.036).However,no significant difference in the OS rates between patients who underwent tumor resection in the 2 groups of patients was found(HR 0.80,95%CI:0.35-1.83,two-sided P=0.595).Major postoperative complications rates after the stage-2 hepatectomy were 54.1%in the ALPPS group and 20.0%in the TACE+PVE group(risk ratio 2.70,95%CI:1.17-6.25,P=0.007).Conclusions:ALPPS resulted in significantly better intermediate-term OS outcomes,at the expenses of a significantly higher perioperative morbidity rate compared with TACE+PVE in patients who had initially unresectable HBV-related HCC.展开更多
Background:To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection plus radiofrequency ablation(SR-RFA)with transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)beyond the Mil...Background:To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection plus radiofrequency ablation(SR-RFA)with transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)beyond the Milan criteria.Methods:From 2009 to 2015,a total of 469 consecutive patients with multifocal HCC beyond the Milan criteria(≤5 nodules)treated with SR-RFA(n=59)or TACE(n=410)were analyzed.Their overall survival(OS)rate was compared through propensity score matching(PSM)analysis at a ratio of 1:2,and 141 patients were identified(SR-RFA,n=47;TACE,n=94).Subgroup analysis was conducted according to factors associated with treatment options.Results:Before PSM,the 1-,2-and 3-year OS rates were 81.5%,68.3%and 64.3%in the SR-RFA group and 58.7%,35.5%and 24.4%in the TACE group,respectively(all P<0.001).After PSM,the 1-,2-and 3-year OS rates in the SR-RFA group were 81.8%,68.7%and 63.4%,whereas those in the TACE group were 59.3%,36.1%and 19.4%,respectively(all P<0.001).Subgroup analysis also revealed a survival advantage of SR-RFA over TACE in each subgroup.The 30-day mortality rate was 1.22%in the TACE group and nil in the SR-RFA group(P=0.861).Conclusions:SR-RFA provides better a long-term survival rate than TACE for patients with multifocal HCC beyond the Milan criteria.SR-RFA may serve as an alternative treatment for patients with multifocal HCC in a selected patient population.展开更多
Several therapeutic procedures have been proposed as bridging treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)awaiting liver transplantation(LT).The most used treatments include transarterial chemoembolizati...Several therapeutic procedures have been proposed as bridging treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)awaiting liver transplantation(LT).The most used treatments include transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.Surgical resection has also been successfully used as a bridging procedure,and LT should be considered a rescue treatment in patients with previous HCC resection who experience tumor recurrence or post-treatment severe decompensation of liver function.The aims of bridging treatments include decreasing the waiting list dropout rate before transplantation,reducing HCC recurrence after transplantation,and improving post-transplant overall survival.To date,no data from prospective randomized studies are available;however,for HCC patients listed for LT within the Milan criteria,prolonging the waiting time over 6-12 mo is a risk factor for tumor spread.Bridging treatments are useful in containing tumor progression and decreasing dropout.Furthermore,the response to pre-LT treatments may represent a surrogate marker of tumor biological aggressiveness and could therefore be evaluated to prioritize HCC candidates for LT.Lastly,although a definitive conclusion can not be reached,the experiences reported to date suggest a positive impact of these treatments on both tumor recurrence and post-transplant patient survival.Advanced HCC may be downstaged to achieve and maintain the current conventional criteria for inclusion in the waiting list for LT.Recent studies have demonstrated that successfully downstaged patients can achieve a 5-year survival rate comparable to that of patients meeting the conventional criteria without requiring downstaging.展开更多
INTRODUCTIONAlthough the long-term postoperative survival rateof gastric cancer(GC) patients has been improvedsignificantly since the local dissection of lymph nodewas widely used in China,yet the low curativeresectio...INTRODUCTIONAlthough the long-term postoperative survival rateof gastric cancer(GC) patients has been improvedsignificantly since the local dissection of lymph nodewas widely used in China,yet the low curativeresection rate and the high recurrence rate fromperitoneal and hepatic metastases hinder it fromfurther improvement.To alter the currentunsatisfactory status of GC treatment,a展开更多
Background Gallbladder carcinoma （GBC） is a commonly-seen malignancy of the biliary tract characterized by difficult early diagnosis, rapid growth, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Nearly half of GBC patients a...Background Gallbladder carcinoma （GBC） is a commonly-seen malignancy of the biliary tract characterized by difficult early diagnosis, rapid growth, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Nearly half of GBC patients also have jaundice, which is a mark of the advanced stage of GBC. The role of radical resection in patients of gallbladder carcinoma with jaundice is still a matter of uncertainty, which we attempted to clarify in this study.展开更多
基金This study was funded by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups,NSFC,China(81521091)the State Key Infection Disease Project of China(2018ZX10732202-002-005)the National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform(2005DKA21300).
文摘Background:Both portal vein embolization(PVE)and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)have merits and demerits when used in patients with unresectable liver cancers due to insufficient volumes in future liver remnant(FLR).Methods:This study was a single-center,prospective randomized comparative study.Patients with the diagnosis of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 2 groups.The primary endpoints were tumor resection and three-year overall survival(OS)rates.Results:Between November 2014 to June 2016,76 patients with unresectable HBV-related HCC due to inadequate volume of FLR were randomly assigned to ALPPS groups(n=38)and TACE+PVE groups(n=38).Thirty-seven patients(97.4%)in the ALPPS group compared with 25 patients(65.8%)in the TACE+PVE group were able to undergo staged hepatectomy(risk ratio 1.48,95%CI:1.17-1.87,P<0.001).The three-year OS rate of the ALPPS group(65.8%)(95%CI:50.7-80.9)was significantly better than the TACE+PVE group(42.1%)(95%CI:26.4-57.8)(HR 0.50,95%CI:0.26-0.98,two-sided P=0.036).However,no significant difference in the OS rates between patients who underwent tumor resection in the 2 groups of patients was found(HR 0.80,95%CI:0.35-1.83,two-sided P=0.595).Major postoperative complications rates after the stage-2 hepatectomy were 54.1%in the ALPPS group and 20.0%in the TACE+PVE group(risk ratio 2.70,95%CI:1.17-6.25,P=0.007).Conclusions:ALPPS resulted in significantly better intermediate-term OS outcomes,at the expenses of a significantly higher perioperative morbidity rate compared with TACE+PVE in patients who had initially unresectable HBV-related HCC.
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81372650,No.81572296)Zhongshan Science&Technology Innovation Fund(2015).
文摘Background:To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection plus radiofrequency ablation(SR-RFA)with transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)beyond the Milan criteria.Methods:From 2009 to 2015,a total of 469 consecutive patients with multifocal HCC beyond the Milan criteria(≤5 nodules)treated with SR-RFA(n=59)or TACE(n=410)were analyzed.Their overall survival(OS)rate was compared through propensity score matching(PSM)analysis at a ratio of 1:2,and 141 patients were identified(SR-RFA,n=47;TACE,n=94).Subgroup analysis was conducted according to factors associated with treatment options.Results:Before PSM,the 1-,2-and 3-year OS rates were 81.5%,68.3%and 64.3%in the SR-RFA group and 58.7%,35.5%and 24.4%in the TACE group,respectively(all P<0.001).After PSM,the 1-,2-and 3-year OS rates in the SR-RFA group were 81.8%,68.7%and 63.4%,whereas those in the TACE group were 59.3%,36.1%and 19.4%,respectively(all P<0.001).Subgroup analysis also revealed a survival advantage of SR-RFA over TACE in each subgroup.The 30-day mortality rate was 1.22%in the TACE group and nil in the SR-RFA group(P=0.861).Conclusions:SR-RFA provides better a long-term survival rate than TACE for patients with multifocal HCC beyond the Milan criteria.SR-RFA may serve as an alternative treatment for patients with multifocal HCC in a selected patient population.
文摘Several therapeutic procedures have been proposed as bridging treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)awaiting liver transplantation(LT).The most used treatments include transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.Surgical resection has also been successfully used as a bridging procedure,and LT should be considered a rescue treatment in patients with previous HCC resection who experience tumor recurrence or post-treatment severe decompensation of liver function.The aims of bridging treatments include decreasing the waiting list dropout rate before transplantation,reducing HCC recurrence after transplantation,and improving post-transplant overall survival.To date,no data from prospective randomized studies are available;however,for HCC patients listed for LT within the Milan criteria,prolonging the waiting time over 6-12 mo is a risk factor for tumor spread.Bridging treatments are useful in containing tumor progression and decreasing dropout.Furthermore,the response to pre-LT treatments may represent a surrogate marker of tumor biological aggressiveness and could therefore be evaluated to prioritize HCC candidates for LT.Lastly,although a definitive conclusion can not be reached,the experiences reported to date suggest a positive impact of these treatments on both tumor recurrence and post-transplant patient survival.Advanced HCC may be downstaged to achieve and maintain the current conventional criteria for inclusion in the waiting list for LT.Recent studies have demonstrated that successfully downstaged patients can achieve a 5-year survival rate comparable to that of patients meeting the conventional criteria without requiring downstaging.
文摘INTRODUCTIONAlthough the long-term postoperative survival rateof gastric cancer(GC) patients has been improvedsignificantly since the local dissection of lymph nodewas widely used in China,yet the low curativeresection rate and the high recurrence rate fromperitoneal and hepatic metastases hinder it fromfurther improvement.To alter the currentunsatisfactory status of GC treatment,a
基金This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 30872507）.
文摘Background Gallbladder carcinoma （GBC） is a commonly-seen malignancy of the biliary tract characterized by difficult early diagnosis, rapid growth, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Nearly half of GBC patients also have jaundice, which is a mark of the advanced stage of GBC. The role of radical resection in patients of gallbladder carcinoma with jaundice is still a matter of uncertainty, which we attempted to clarify in this study.
