目的:统计全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生率,并分析其影响因素。方法:以2020年5月~2020年10月我院收治的110例接受全身麻醉手术的患者为研究对象,采用回顾性分析方法,整理患者的病历资料。观察全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生...目的:统计全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生率,并分析其影响因素。方法:以2020年5月~2020年10月我院收治的110例接受全身麻醉手术的患者为研究对象,采用回顾性分析方法,整理患者的病历资料。观察全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生率,发生低体温的列为低体温组,未发生低体温的列为正常体温组,采用多因素Logistic回归分析低体温的相关因素。结果:全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温患者为15例,低体温发生率为13.64%(15/110)。单因素分析发现,全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生与年龄、麻醉时间、手术时间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、苏醒延迟、术中输液量有关(P<0.05),而与性别、体质量指数、术中环境温度、术前血红蛋白无关(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,手术时间>4h、ASA分级为Ⅲ~Ⅳ级、术中输液量>1300 m L、年龄>60岁为全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温的发生不可避免,且受多种因素影响,需尽量缩短手术时间,做好输入液体保温,特别做好老年患者保温工作,以减少低体温的发生风险。展开更多
AIM: To investigate whether discharge scoring criteria are as safe as clinical criteria for discharge decision and allow for earlier discharge.METHODS: About 220 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy under se...AIM: To investigate whether discharge scoring criteria are as safe as clinical criteria for discharge decision and allow for earlier discharge.METHODS: About 220 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation with Meperidine plus Midazolam were enrolled and assigned to 2 groups: in Control-group(110 subjects) discharge decision was based on the clinical assessment; in PADSS-group(110subjects) discharge decision was based on the modified Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System(PADSS).Measurements of the PADDS score were taken every20 min after colonoscopy, and patients were discharged after two consecutive PADSS scores ≥ 9. The investigator called each patient 24-48 h after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire, to detect any delayed complications. Patients in which cecal intubation was not performed and those who were not found at follow-up phone call were excluded from the study.RESULTS: Thirteen patients(7 in Control-group and6 in PADSS-group) were excluded from the study. Recovery from sedation was faster in PADSS-group than in Control-group(58.75 ± 18.67 min vs 95.14 ± 10.85min, respectively; P < 0.001). Recovery time resulted shorter than 60 min in 39 patients of PADSS-group(37.5%), and in no patient of Control-group(P < 0.001).At follow-up phone call, no patient declared any hospital re-admission because of problems related to colonoscopy and/or sedation. Mild delayed post-discharge symptoms occurred in 57 patients in Control-group(55.3%)and in 32 in PADSS-group(30.7%). The most common symptoms were drowsiness, weakness, abdominal distension, and headache. Only 3 subjects needed to take some drugs because of post-discharge symptoms.CONCLUSION: The Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System is as safe as the clinical assessment and allows for an earlier patient discharge after colonoscopy performed under sedation.展开更多
文摘目的:统计全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生率,并分析其影响因素。方法:以2020年5月~2020年10月我院收治的110例接受全身麻醉手术的患者为研究对象,采用回顾性分析方法,整理患者的病历资料。观察全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生率,发生低体温的列为低体温组,未发生低体温的列为正常体温组,采用多因素Logistic回归分析低体温的相关因素。结果:全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温患者为15例,低体温发生率为13.64%(15/110)。单因素分析发现,全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生与年龄、麻醉时间、手术时间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、苏醒延迟、术中输液量有关(P<0.05),而与性别、体质量指数、术中环境温度、术前血红蛋白无关(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,手术时间>4h、ASA分级为Ⅲ~Ⅳ级、术中输液量>1300 m L、年龄>60岁为全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温发生的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:全身麻醉术后患者苏醒室内低体温的发生不可避免,且受多种因素影响,需尽量缩短手术时间,做好输入液体保温,特别做好老年患者保温工作,以减少低体温的发生风险。
文摘AIM: To investigate whether discharge scoring criteria are as safe as clinical criteria for discharge decision and allow for earlier discharge.METHODS: About 220 consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation with Meperidine plus Midazolam were enrolled and assigned to 2 groups: in Control-group(110 subjects) discharge decision was based on the clinical assessment; in PADSS-group(110subjects) discharge decision was based on the modified Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System(PADSS).Measurements of the PADDS score were taken every20 min after colonoscopy, and patients were discharged after two consecutive PADSS scores ≥ 9. The investigator called each patient 24-48 h after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire, to detect any delayed complications. Patients in which cecal intubation was not performed and those who were not found at follow-up phone call were excluded from the study.RESULTS: Thirteen patients(7 in Control-group and6 in PADSS-group) were excluded from the study. Recovery from sedation was faster in PADSS-group than in Control-group(58.75 ± 18.67 min vs 95.14 ± 10.85min, respectively; P < 0.001). Recovery time resulted shorter than 60 min in 39 patients of PADSS-group(37.5%), and in no patient of Control-group(P < 0.001).At follow-up phone call, no patient declared any hospital re-admission because of problems related to colonoscopy and/or sedation. Mild delayed post-discharge symptoms occurred in 57 patients in Control-group(55.3%)and in 32 in PADSS-group(30.7%). The most common symptoms were drowsiness, weakness, abdominal distension, and headache. Only 3 subjects needed to take some drugs because of post-discharge symptoms.CONCLUSION: The Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System is as safe as the clinical assessment and allows for an earlier patient discharge after colonoscopy performed under sedation.
