Colorectal cancer ranks third in the global cancer data in 2020. Colorectal scope is the most effective method to diagnose colorectal diseases such as benign and malignant colorectal tumors. The poor quality of intest...Colorectal cancer ranks third in the global cancer data in 2020. Colorectal scope is the most effective method to diagnose colorectal diseases such as benign and malignant colorectal tumors. The poor quality of intestinal preparation causes an increased rate of missed diagnosis of colorectal tumors, reduces the rate of cecal intubation for colorectal examination, increases the discomfort, and reduces the compliance of re-examination. Therefore, we should try our best to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. This study reviewed the latest advances related to the preoperative preparation for colonoscopy. Recent research shows that smartphone apps can provide more detailed education and guidance on bowel preparation;Pre-packaged foods are more suitable as a way to eat before colonoscopy. The use of smaller doses, better taste of cathartic agents, and some auxiliary measures, combined with the patient’s situation to provide personalized intestinal preparation measures to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. Starting from the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation, continuous improvement of patients’ tolerance to bowel preparation, continuous improvement of bowel preparation plan based on individual factors’ needs, and better communication with examined subjects by using existing scientific information technology, may be the hot spot of colonoscopy bowel preparation research in the next few years.展开更多
目的探讨老年人行走功能状态与结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的关系。方法选取2017年1月至2018年3月北京老年医院消化科住院期间行结肠镜检查的153例老年患者。检查前通过Barthel指数评价患者行走功能,并根据行走是否独立将患者分为行走正常...目的探讨老年人行走功能状态与结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的关系。方法选取2017年1月至2018年3月北京老年医院消化科住院期间行结肠镜检查的153例老年患者。检查前通过Barthel指数评价患者行走功能,并根据行走是否独立将患者分为行走正常组82例及行走困难组71例。2组患者采取相同的肠道准备方法,记录肠道清洁完成情况并计算清洁有效率。采用SPSS 19.0统计软件进行分析。根据数据类型,组间比较采用独立样本t检验或χ2检验。相关性分析采用Spearman秩相关检验。结果与行走困难组比较,行走正常组患者完整服用肠道清洁剂的比例显著升高[87.8%(72/82) vs63.4%(45/71),P<0.01]。而在未完整服用肠道清洁剂的患者中,与行走困难组比较,行走正常组患者因不能忍受频繁排便的比例显著降低,差异有统计学意义[8.54%(7/82) vs 30.99%(22/71),P=0.001],但因不良反应导致未完整服用肠道清洁剂的比例2组差异无统计学意义[3. 66%(3/82) vs 5. 63%(4/71),P=0.705]。Spearman秩相关分析显示,行走功能状态与肠道准备清洁质量呈正相关(r=0.333,P<0.01)。结论老年患者行走功能状态与结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量相关,行走困难影响患者肠道准备质量。展开更多
文摘Colorectal cancer ranks third in the global cancer data in 2020. Colorectal scope is the most effective method to diagnose colorectal diseases such as benign and malignant colorectal tumors. The poor quality of intestinal preparation causes an increased rate of missed diagnosis of colorectal tumors, reduces the rate of cecal intubation for colorectal examination, increases the discomfort, and reduces the compliance of re-examination. Therefore, we should try our best to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. This study reviewed the latest advances related to the preoperative preparation for colonoscopy. Recent research shows that smartphone apps can provide more detailed education and guidance on bowel preparation;Pre-packaged foods are more suitable as a way to eat before colonoscopy. The use of smaller doses, better taste of cathartic agents, and some auxiliary measures, combined with the patient’s situation to provide personalized intestinal preparation measures to improve the quality of intestinal preparation. Starting from the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation, continuous improvement of patients’ tolerance to bowel preparation, continuous improvement of bowel preparation plan based on individual factors’ needs, and better communication with examined subjects by using existing scientific information technology, may be the hot spot of colonoscopy bowel preparation research in the next few years.
文摘目的探讨老年人行走功能状态与结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的关系。方法选取2017年1月至2018年3月北京老年医院消化科住院期间行结肠镜检查的153例老年患者。检查前通过Barthel指数评价患者行走功能,并根据行走是否独立将患者分为行走正常组82例及行走困难组71例。2组患者采取相同的肠道准备方法,记录肠道清洁完成情况并计算清洁有效率。采用SPSS 19.0统计软件进行分析。根据数据类型,组间比较采用独立样本t检验或χ2检验。相关性分析采用Spearman秩相关检验。结果与行走困难组比较,行走正常组患者完整服用肠道清洁剂的比例显著升高[87.8%(72/82) vs63.4%(45/71),P<0.01]。而在未完整服用肠道清洁剂的患者中,与行走困难组比较,行走正常组患者因不能忍受频繁排便的比例显著降低,差异有统计学意义[8.54%(7/82) vs 30.99%(22/71),P=0.001],但因不良反应导致未完整服用肠道清洁剂的比例2组差异无统计学意义[3. 66%(3/82) vs 5. 63%(4/71),P=0.705]。Spearman秩相关分析显示,行走功能状态与肠道准备清洁质量呈正相关(r=0.333,P<0.01)。结论老年患者行走功能状态与结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量相关,行走困难影响患者肠道准备质量。
