Objective： To investigate the protective effect of Shenfu Injection （参附注射液, SFI） against myocardium ischemia/reperfusion injury （IRI） in mitral valve replacement （MVR） with cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB）. ...Objective： To investigate the protective effect of Shenfu Injection （参附注射液, SFI） against myocardium ischemia/reperfusion injury （IRI） in mitral valve replacement （MVR） with cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB）. Metheds： Forty patients undergoing selective MVR were randomly assigned to the control group and trial Groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ,Ⅲ, and Ⅳ according to the different administrations of SFI, 8 patients in each group. The changes of systolic blood pressure （SBP）, mean blood pressure （MBP）, diastolic blood pressure （DBP） in each group were monitored, respectively. The recovering percentage of spontaneous heart beat, the heart rate （HR） and cardiac rhythm as well as the abnormal duration of ECG-ST segment were recorded after the restoration of heart beat. The serum concentration of cardiac troponin Ⅰ （cTnl）, malondialdehyde （MDA） and the activity of superoxide dismutase （SOD） were determined as well. Results： （1） The SBP, MBP and DBP values, the recovering rate of spontaneous heart beat, HR, ECG-ST, atrioventricular block and ventricular arrhythmia were significantly improved in group Ⅳ compared with any other groups. （2） Compared with the control group, the postoperative serum contents of cTnl and MDA were significantly decreased, but the activity of SOD was significantly increased in group Ⅳ. Cenclusiens： SFI had a certain protective effect against myocardium IRI. Moreover, better efficacy was seen with the administration of 1.5 mL/kg SFI into CPB priming fluid and pumping 1.5 mL/kg SFI via CPB as soon as the clamped aorta was unclamped.展开更多
Objective To systematically review randomized controlled trials to compare myocardial protection profiles of sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） surgery. Methods ...Objective To systematically review randomized controlled trials to compare myocardial protection profiles of sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） surgery. Methods Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing sevoflurane with propofol for protecting myocardium in adult patients undergoing CABG surgery. Two authors independently extracted patients＇ perioperative data, including patients＇ baseline characteristics, surgical variables, and outcome data. For continuous variables, treatment effects were calculated as weighted mean difference （WMD） and 95% confidential interval （C/）. For dichotomous data, treatment effects were calculated as odds ratio （OR） and 95% CI. Each outcome was tested for heterogeneity, and randomized-effects or fixed-effects model was used in the presence or absence of significant heterogeneity （Q test P〈0.05）. Sensitivity analyses were done by examining the influence of statistical model on estimated treatment effects. Publication bias was explored through visual inspection of funnel plots of the outcomes. Statistical significance was defined as P〈0.05. Results Our search yielded 13 studies including 696 patients, and 402 patients were allocated into sevoflurane group and 294 into propofol group. There was no significant difference in postoperative mechanical ventilation time, inotropic support, mortality, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation between the two groups （all P〉0.05）. Patients randomized into sevoflurane group had higher post-bypass cardiac index （WMD=0.39, 95% CI： 0.18 to 0.60, P=0.0003）, lower troponin I level （WMD=-0.82, 95% CI：-0.87 to -0.85, P=0.0002）, lower incidence of myocardial ischemia （OR=0.37, 95% CI： 0.16 to 0.83, P=0.02）, shorter ICU and hospital stay length （WMD=-10.99, 95% CI： -12.97 to -9.01, P〈0.00001; WMD=-0.78, 95% CI： -1.00 to -0.56, P〈0.00001, respectively）. Conclusion This meta-analysis has 展开更多
文摘Objective： To investigate the protective effect of Shenfu Injection （参附注射液, SFI） against myocardium ischemia/reperfusion injury （IRI） in mitral valve replacement （MVR） with cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB）. Metheds： Forty patients undergoing selective MVR were randomly assigned to the control group and trial Groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ,Ⅲ, and Ⅳ according to the different administrations of SFI, 8 patients in each group. The changes of systolic blood pressure （SBP）, mean blood pressure （MBP）, diastolic blood pressure （DBP） in each group were monitored, respectively. The recovering percentage of spontaneous heart beat, the heart rate （HR） and cardiac rhythm as well as the abnormal duration of ECG-ST segment were recorded after the restoration of heart beat. The serum concentration of cardiac troponin Ⅰ （cTnl）, malondialdehyde （MDA） and the activity of superoxide dismutase （SOD） were determined as well. Results： （1） The SBP, MBP and DBP values, the recovering rate of spontaneous heart beat, HR, ECG-ST, atrioventricular block and ventricular arrhythmia were significantly improved in group Ⅳ compared with any other groups. （2） Compared with the control group, the postoperative serum contents of cTnl and MDA were significantly decreased, but the activity of SOD was significantly increased in group Ⅳ. Cenclusiens： SFI had a certain protective effect against myocardium IRI. Moreover, better efficacy was seen with the administration of 1.5 mL/kg SFI into CPB priming fluid and pumping 1.5 mL/kg SFI via CPB as soon as the clamped aorta was unclamped.
文摘Objective To systematically review randomized controlled trials to compare myocardial protection profiles of sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） surgery. Methods Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing sevoflurane with propofol for protecting myocardium in adult patients undergoing CABG surgery. Two authors independently extracted patients＇ perioperative data, including patients＇ baseline characteristics, surgical variables, and outcome data. For continuous variables, treatment effects were calculated as weighted mean difference （WMD） and 95% confidential interval （C/）. For dichotomous data, treatment effects were calculated as odds ratio （OR） and 95% CI. Each outcome was tested for heterogeneity, and randomized-effects or fixed-effects model was used in the presence or absence of significant heterogeneity （Q test P〈0.05）. Sensitivity analyses were done by examining the influence of statistical model on estimated treatment effects. Publication bias was explored through visual inspection of funnel plots of the outcomes. Statistical significance was defined as P〈0.05. Results Our search yielded 13 studies including 696 patients, and 402 patients were allocated into sevoflurane group and 294 into propofol group. There was no significant difference in postoperative mechanical ventilation time, inotropic support, mortality, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation between the two groups （all P〉0.05）. Patients randomized into sevoflurane group had higher post-bypass cardiac index （WMD=0.39, 95% CI： 0.18 to 0.60, P=0.0003）, lower troponin I level （WMD=-0.82, 95% CI：-0.87 to -0.85, P=0.0002）, lower incidence of myocardial ischemia （OR=0.37, 95% CI： 0.16 to 0.83, P=0.02）, shorter ICU and hospital stay length （WMD=-10.99, 95% CI： -12.97 to -9.01, P〈0.00001; WMD=-0.78, 95% CI： -1.00 to -0.56, P〈0.00001, respectively）. Conclusion This meta-analysis has
