Background: Placenta praevia accounts for significant maternal morbidity and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in blood transfusion technique and surgical procedure, abnormal placentation still remai...Background: Placenta praevia accounts for significant maternal morbidity and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in blood transfusion technique and surgical procedure, abnormal placentation still remains a difficult challenge for obstetricians. Objective: To determine the influence of booking status on the fetal and maternal outcome among parturients with placenta praevia that underwent caesarian delivery. Methodology: This was a comparative and retrospective study between booked and unbooked subjects with significant placenta praevia that were delivered by caesarian section between January 1<sup>st</sup> 2004 and December 31<sup>st</sup> 2008 with respect to maternal and fetal outcome. Result: Out of 14,344 deliveries during study period, 123 cases of placenta praevia that underwent caesarian delivery were identified giving a prevalence rate of 0.86%. 49 subjects were booked while 74 were unbooked. There was no statistically significant difference between booked and unbooked cases with respect to risk factors (30.6% of booked and 23% of unbooked), X<sup>2</sup>(4) = 7.203, P = 0.126 and the mean blood loss at surgery (870.4 ± 486.9 ml in booked versus 779.7 ± 380.96 ml in unbooked), X<sup>2</sup>(1) = 0.202, P = 0.653. However, antepartum transfusion (12.2% booked versus 34.7% unbooked) and postpartum transfusion (51% booked versus 72% unbooked) showed statistically significant difference, X<sup>2</sup>(1) = 9.744, P = 0.002. One maternal death occurred amongst the unbooked cases and none among the booked cases. Statistically significant differences were also noted in the apgar score at 1 minute X<sup>2</sup>(3) = 15.528, P = 0.001 and 5 minutes X<sup>2</sup>(3) = 12.912, P = 0.005 respectively. More babies died in the unbooked group (19) compared to two (2) in the booked mothers. Conclusion: Unbooked status in placenta previa significantly increases the risk for antepartum and postpartum transfusion, is associated with higher mortality, increased preterm delivery, poorer apgar scores and highe展开更多
Objectives: To describe the incidence and predictive factors for massive haemorrhage during a caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among consecutive wom...Objectives: To describe the incidence and predictive factors for massive haemorrhage during a caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among consecutive women with a placenta praevia planned for a caesarean delivery between 2001-2011 in one academic centre and two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Massive haemorrhage was defined as ≥1000 mL blood loss during caesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to assess which maternal and pregnancy characteristics were predictors for massive haemorrhage during caesarean delivery. Results: Of 54,794 deliveries, we identified 215 (0.39%) women with placenta praevia who underwent a Caesarean delivery, of whom 94 (44%) had massive haemorrhage at or after surgery. After univariable preselection, multivariable logistic regression indicated that higher maternal age (OR 2.09;95% CI 1.17 - 3.74), no Caucasian ethnicity (OR 1.73;95% CI 0.92 - 3.27), multiple pregnancy (OR 3.92;95% CI 0.72 - 21.28), lower systolic blood pressure during pregnancy (OR 1.03;95% CI 1.00 - 1.07) and the placenta located at the anterior wall (OR 2.21;95% CI 1.20 - 4.04) were independent predictors for massive haemorrhage during a caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia. Predicted probabilities varied between 22% and 71%. The model has a reasonable discriminative ability and acceptable calibration. Conclusions: Women with placenta praevia are at high risk for massive haemorrhage during caesarean delivery. The risk profile can be used to identify extreme high-risk women in whom extensive preventive measures are justified.展开更多
目的探讨急性等容血液稀释(ANH)在完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产手术中应用的有效性和安全性。方法将52例需剖宫产终止妊娠的完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的产妇随机双盲分为三组:A组在术前进行ANH,B组在术前进行急性高容血液稀释(AH...目的探讨急性等容血液稀释(ANH)在完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产手术中应用的有效性和安全性。方法将52例需剖宫产终止妊娠的完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的产妇随机双盲分为三组:A组在术前进行ANH,B组在术前进行急性高容血液稀释(AHH),C组术前无特殊处理。记录三组产妇术中总出血量、异体血输注例数、术前、术后2h血常规及三组新生儿1、5 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血血气。结果 A、B组产妇急性血液稀释后血气分析差异无统计学意义。A组输注异体血例数明显少于B、C组(P<0.05),术后2 h产妇Hb、Hct、Plt明显高于B、C组(P<0.05),B、C组差异无统计学意义;三组新生儿1、5 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血气分析差异无统计学意义。结论 ANH自体输血对孕妇及胎儿均无不良影响,是一种安全、有效的输血方式。展开更多
文摘Background: Placenta praevia accounts for significant maternal morbidity and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in blood transfusion technique and surgical procedure, abnormal placentation still remains a difficult challenge for obstetricians. Objective: To determine the influence of booking status on the fetal and maternal outcome among parturients with placenta praevia that underwent caesarian delivery. Methodology: This was a comparative and retrospective study between booked and unbooked subjects with significant placenta praevia that were delivered by caesarian section between January 1<sup>st</sup> 2004 and December 31<sup>st</sup> 2008 with respect to maternal and fetal outcome. Result: Out of 14,344 deliveries during study period, 123 cases of placenta praevia that underwent caesarian delivery were identified giving a prevalence rate of 0.86%. 49 subjects were booked while 74 were unbooked. There was no statistically significant difference between booked and unbooked cases with respect to risk factors (30.6% of booked and 23% of unbooked), X<sup>2</sup>(4) = 7.203, P = 0.126 and the mean blood loss at surgery (870.4 ± 486.9 ml in booked versus 779.7 ± 380.96 ml in unbooked), X<sup>2</sup>(1) = 0.202, P = 0.653. However, antepartum transfusion (12.2% booked versus 34.7% unbooked) and postpartum transfusion (51% booked versus 72% unbooked) showed statistically significant difference, X<sup>2</sup>(1) = 9.744, P = 0.002. One maternal death occurred amongst the unbooked cases and none among the booked cases. Statistically significant differences were also noted in the apgar score at 1 minute X<sup>2</sup>(3) = 15.528, P = 0.001 and 5 minutes X<sup>2</sup>(3) = 12.912, P = 0.005 respectively. More babies died in the unbooked group (19) compared to two (2) in the booked mothers. Conclusion: Unbooked status in placenta previa significantly increases the risk for antepartum and postpartum transfusion, is associated with higher mortality, increased preterm delivery, poorer apgar scores and highe
文摘Objectives: To describe the incidence and predictive factors for massive haemorrhage during a caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among consecutive women with a placenta praevia planned for a caesarean delivery between 2001-2011 in one academic centre and two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Massive haemorrhage was defined as ≥1000 mL blood loss during caesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to assess which maternal and pregnancy characteristics were predictors for massive haemorrhage during caesarean delivery. Results: Of 54,794 deliveries, we identified 215 (0.39%) women with placenta praevia who underwent a Caesarean delivery, of whom 94 (44%) had massive haemorrhage at or after surgery. After univariable preselection, multivariable logistic regression indicated that higher maternal age (OR 2.09;95% CI 1.17 - 3.74), no Caucasian ethnicity (OR 1.73;95% CI 0.92 - 3.27), multiple pregnancy (OR 3.92;95% CI 0.72 - 21.28), lower systolic blood pressure during pregnancy (OR 1.03;95% CI 1.00 - 1.07) and the placenta located at the anterior wall (OR 2.21;95% CI 1.20 - 4.04) were independent predictors for massive haemorrhage during a caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia. Predicted probabilities varied between 22% and 71%. The model has a reasonable discriminative ability and acceptable calibration. Conclusions: Women with placenta praevia are at high risk for massive haemorrhage during caesarean delivery. The risk profile can be used to identify extreme high-risk women in whom extensive preventive measures are justified.
文摘目的探讨急性等容血液稀释(ANH)在完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入剖宫产手术中应用的有效性和安全性。方法将52例需剖宫产终止妊娠的完全性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的产妇随机双盲分为三组:A组在术前进行ANH,B组在术前进行急性高容血液稀释(AHH),C组术前无特殊处理。记录三组产妇术中总出血量、异体血输注例数、术前、术后2h血常规及三组新生儿1、5 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血血气。结果 A、B组产妇急性血液稀释后血气分析差异无统计学意义。A组输注异体血例数明显少于B、C组(P<0.05),术后2 h产妇Hb、Hct、Plt明显高于B、C组(P<0.05),B、C组差异无统计学意义;三组新生儿1、5 min Apgar评分和脐动脉血气分析差异无统计学意义。结论 ANH自体输血对孕妇及胎儿均无不良影响,是一种安全、有效的输血方式。
