Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive procedure than conventional open hepatectomy for the resection of hepatic lesions. Increases in experiences with the technique, in combination with advances in technolo...Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive procedure than conventional open hepatectomy for the resection of hepatic lesions. Increases in experiences with the technique, in combination with advances in technology, have promoted the popularity of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, indications for usage and potential contraindications of the procedure remain unresolved. The characteristics and specific advantages of the procedure, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients with chronic liver diseases,are reviewed and discussed in this paper. For cirrhotic patients with liver tumors, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy minimizes destruction of the collateral blood and lymphatic flow from laparotomy and mobilization, and mesenchymal injury from compression. Therefore, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy has the specific advantage of minimal postoperative ascites production that leads to lowering the risk of disturbance in water or electrolyte balance and hypoproteinemia. It minimizes complications that routinely trigger postoperative serious liver failure. Under adequate patient positioning and port arrangement, the partial resection of the liver in the area of subphrenic space, peri-inferior vena cava area or next to the attachment of retro-peritoneum is facilitated in pure laparoscopic surgery by providing good vision and manipulation in the small operative field.Furthermore, the features of reduced post-operative adhesion, good vision, and manipulation within the small area between the adhesions make this procedure safer in the context of repeat hepatectomy procedures.These improved features are especially advantageous for patients with liver cirrhosis and multicentric and/or metachronous HCCs.展开更多
Accumulation of experiences and technological advances after the first report of laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) are now revealing the characteristics and specific advantages of this approach, especially for hepatoc...Accumulation of experiences and technological advances after the first report of laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) are now revealing the characteristics and specific advantages of this approach, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients with chronic liver diseases(CLD). Inlaparoscopic approach, there are minimum needs for:(1) laparotomy and dissection of the attachments and adhesion which may cause destructions in the collateral blood and lymphatic flows; and(2) compression of the liver which may cause parenchymal damage for the liver resection(LR). These are especially beneficial for the patients with CLD. LLR results in minimal postoperative ascites and the other complications, which could potentially lead to lowering the risk of fatal liver failure. These characteristics of LLR facilitate surgical treatment application to the patients of HCC with background CLD. Laparoscopic approach also results in improved vision and manipulation in a small operative field under several conditions, including the cases where it is necessary to perform repeat LR between adhesions. These characteristics make LLR safer and more accessible to the repeat treatment, such as multicentric and metachronous lesions in the cirrhotic liver. These advantages of LLR indicate it is a superior method than open LR under certain conditions in patients of HCC with background CLD.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis via the portal vein for"small-for-size"syndrome(SFSS)aided by extracorporeal continuous portal diversion(ECPD).METHODS:Extensive or total hepatectomy in the pi...AIM:To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis via the portal vein for"small-for-size"syndrome(SFSS)aided by extracorporeal continuous portal diversion(ECPD).METHODS:Extensive or total hepatectomy in the pig is usually adopted as a postoperative liver failure(PLF)or SFSS model.In this study,animals which underwent85%-90%hepatectomy were randomized into either the Systemic group(n=7)or the Portal group(n=7).In the Systemic group,all pigs received temporal plasmapheresis(PP)via the extracorporeal catheter circuit(systemic to systemic circulation)from 24 to 30 h posthepatectomy(PH);in the Portal group,all pigs received ECPD to divert partial portal vein flow(PVF)to the systemic circulation after hepatectomy,then converted to temporal PP from 24 to 30 h PH,and subsequently converted to ECPD again until 48 h PH.In the Portal group,the PVF was preserved at 3.0-3.3 times that of the baseline value,similar to that following 70%hepatectomy,which was regarded as the optimal PVF to the hypertrophic liver remnant.At 48 h PH,all pigs were re-opened and the portal vein pressure(PVP),PVF,and HAF(hepatic artery flow)were measured,and then diversion of the portal venous flow was terminated.After1 h the PVP,PVF,and HAF were re-measured.The portal hemodynamic changes,liver injury,liver regeneration and bacterial/lipopolysaccharide(LPS)translocation were evaluated in the two groups.RESULTS:The PVP in the Portal group was significantly lower than that in the Systemic group during the time period from 2 to 49 h PH(P<0.05).Serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT),total bilirubin(TB)and ammonia were significantly reduced in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group from 24 to 48 h PH(P<0.05).The Portal group may have attenuated sinusoidal endothelial injury and decreased the level of HA compared with the Systemic group.In the Systemic group,there was significant sinusoidal dilation,hydropic changes in hepatocytes and hemorrhage into the hepatic parenchyma,and the sinusoidal endothelial lining was partially destroyed and detached int展开更多
文摘Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive procedure than conventional open hepatectomy for the resection of hepatic lesions. Increases in experiences with the technique, in combination with advances in technology, have promoted the popularity of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, indications for usage and potential contraindications of the procedure remain unresolved. The characteristics and specific advantages of the procedure, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients with chronic liver diseases,are reviewed and discussed in this paper. For cirrhotic patients with liver tumors, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy minimizes destruction of the collateral blood and lymphatic flow from laparotomy and mobilization, and mesenchymal injury from compression. Therefore, pure laparoscopic hepatectomy has the specific advantage of minimal postoperative ascites production that leads to lowering the risk of disturbance in water or electrolyte balance and hypoproteinemia. It minimizes complications that routinely trigger postoperative serious liver failure. Under adequate patient positioning and port arrangement, the partial resection of the liver in the area of subphrenic space, peri-inferior vena cava area or next to the attachment of retro-peritoneum is facilitated in pure laparoscopic surgery by providing good vision and manipulation in the small operative field.Furthermore, the features of reduced post-operative adhesion, good vision, and manipulation within the small area between the adhesions make this procedure safer in the context of repeat hepatectomy procedures.These improved features are especially advantageous for patients with liver cirrhosis and multicentric and/or metachronous HCCs.
文摘Accumulation of experiences and technological advances after the first report of laparoscopic liver resection(LLR) are now revealing the characteristics and specific advantages of this approach, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients with chronic liver diseases(CLD). Inlaparoscopic approach, there are minimum needs for:(1) laparotomy and dissection of the attachments and adhesion which may cause destructions in the collateral blood and lymphatic flows; and(2) compression of the liver which may cause parenchymal damage for the liver resection(LR). These are especially beneficial for the patients with CLD. LLR results in minimal postoperative ascites and the other complications, which could potentially lead to lowering the risk of fatal liver failure. These characteristics of LLR facilitate surgical treatment application to the patients of HCC with background CLD. Laparoscopic approach also results in improved vision and manipulation in a small operative field under several conditions, including the cases where it is necessary to perform repeat LR between adhesions. These characteristics make LLR safer and more accessible to the repeat treatment, such as multicentric and metachronous lesions in the cirrhotic liver. These advantages of LLR indicate it is a superior method than open LR under certain conditions in patients of HCC with background CLD.
文摘AIM:To investigate the effect of plasmapheresis via the portal vein for"small-for-size"syndrome(SFSS)aided by extracorporeal continuous portal diversion(ECPD).METHODS:Extensive or total hepatectomy in the pig is usually adopted as a postoperative liver failure(PLF)or SFSS model.In this study,animals which underwent85%-90%hepatectomy were randomized into either the Systemic group(n=7)or the Portal group(n=7).In the Systemic group,all pigs received temporal plasmapheresis(PP)via the extracorporeal catheter circuit(systemic to systemic circulation)from 24 to 30 h posthepatectomy(PH);in the Portal group,all pigs received ECPD to divert partial portal vein flow(PVF)to the systemic circulation after hepatectomy,then converted to temporal PP from 24 to 30 h PH,and subsequently converted to ECPD again until 48 h PH.In the Portal group,the PVF was preserved at 3.0-3.3 times that of the baseline value,similar to that following 70%hepatectomy,which was regarded as the optimal PVF to the hypertrophic liver remnant.At 48 h PH,all pigs were re-opened and the portal vein pressure(PVP),PVF,and HAF(hepatic artery flow)were measured,and then diversion of the portal venous flow was terminated.After1 h the PVP,PVF,and HAF were re-measured.The portal hemodynamic changes,liver injury,liver regeneration and bacterial/lipopolysaccharide(LPS)translocation were evaluated in the two groups.RESULTS:The PVP in the Portal group was significantly lower than that in the Systemic group during the time period from 2 to 49 h PH(P<0.05).Serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT),total bilirubin(TB)and ammonia were significantly reduced in the Portal group compared with the Systemic group from 24 to 48 h PH(P<0.05).The Portal group may have attenuated sinusoidal endothelial injury and decreased the level of HA compared with the Systemic group.In the Systemic group,there was significant sinusoidal dilation,hydropic changes in hepatocytes and hemorrhage into the hepatic parenchyma,and the sinusoidal endothelial lining was partially destroyed and detached int
