目的:探讨经掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗不稳定右桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院于2014年6月至2017年6月收治的行掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗的不稳定右桡骨远端骨折患者53例,观察患者临床疗效、骨折愈合情况、...目的:探讨经掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗不稳定右桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院于2014年6月至2017年6月收治的行掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗的不稳定右桡骨远端骨折患者53例,观察患者临床疗效、骨折愈合情况、腕关节恢复情况、术后并发症发生情况。结果:末次随访根据Gartland and Werlkey功能评分发现手术治疗优良率为94.34%;末次随访患者掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨长度相对术前均有明显改善(P<0.05); 53例患者术后均未见并发症发生;骨折愈合时间为(8.45±1.47)周;至末次随访,腕关节活动度恢复至健侧78%～100%,握力恢复至健侧72%～91%。结论:经掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗不稳定右桡骨远端骨折临床疗效较好,可最大程度恢复桡骨长度、掌倾角、尺偏角,且术后腕关节恢复良好,术后未见并发症发生。展开更多
Background: Trigger finger is characterized by the inability to smoothly flex and extend the digit. Corticosteroids are an accepted non-surgical treatment option and can be delivered via two techniques. While the palm...Background: Trigger finger is characterized by the inability to smoothly flex and extend the digit. Corticosteroids are an accepted non-surgical treatment option and can be delivered via two techniques. While the palmar approach is more commonly used, some have suggested that the mid-axial approach may be less painful for patients and yield higher intrasheath injection rates. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the palmar and midaxial approaches for delivery of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath using radio-opaque dye in a cadaver model. Methods: A total of 50 injections were performed, 25 via midaxial technique and 25 via palmar technique. A one inch, 25-gauge needle was used to inject 1 mL of Isovue contrast dye into the flexor tendon sheath under live fluoroscopy. The fluoroscopic images were examined after injection to determine intrasheath versus extrasheath delivery of the dye, with visualization of contrast filling the sheath defining a successful injection. Results: The midaxial approach had a success rate of 52% compared to the conventional palmar approach success rate of 36%, p=0.5. The ring finger is the most common location of trigger finger and the rates of success were equal between groups for this digit (80%). Conclusions: Based on our findings, there is no statistical difference in the accuracy of intrasheath injection between the midaxial technique and palmar technique. The midaxial technique can be considered as an alternative to the palmar technique for trigger finger injection.展开更多
文摘目的:探讨经掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗不稳定右桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院于2014年6月至2017年6月收治的行掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗的不稳定右桡骨远端骨折患者53例,观察患者临床疗效、骨折愈合情况、腕关节恢复情况、术后并发症发生情况。结果:末次随访根据Gartland and Werlkey功能评分发现手术治疗优良率为94.34%;末次随访患者掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨长度相对术前均有明显改善(P<0.05); 53例患者术后均未见并发症发生;骨折愈合时间为(8.45±1.47)周;至末次随访,腕关节活动度恢复至健侧78%～100%,握力恢复至健侧72%～91%。结论:经掌侧入路锁定加压钢板内固定治疗不稳定右桡骨远端骨折临床疗效较好,可最大程度恢复桡骨长度、掌倾角、尺偏角,且术后腕关节恢复良好,术后未见并发症发生。
文摘Background: Trigger finger is characterized by the inability to smoothly flex and extend the digit. Corticosteroids are an accepted non-surgical treatment option and can be delivered via two techniques. While the palmar approach is more commonly used, some have suggested that the mid-axial approach may be less painful for patients and yield higher intrasheath injection rates. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the palmar and midaxial approaches for delivery of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath using radio-opaque dye in a cadaver model. Methods: A total of 50 injections were performed, 25 via midaxial technique and 25 via palmar technique. A one inch, 25-gauge needle was used to inject 1 mL of Isovue contrast dye into the flexor tendon sheath under live fluoroscopy. The fluoroscopic images were examined after injection to determine intrasheath versus extrasheath delivery of the dye, with visualization of contrast filling the sheath defining a successful injection. Results: The midaxial approach had a success rate of 52% compared to the conventional palmar approach success rate of 36%, p=0.5. The ring finger is the most common location of trigger finger and the rates of success were equal between groups for this digit (80%). Conclusions: Based on our findings, there is no statistical difference in the accuracy of intrasheath injection between the midaxial technique and palmar technique. The midaxial technique can be considered as an alternative to the palmar technique for trigger finger injection.
