In this paper, we present the results of the evaluation of three low-cost laser sensor</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><...In this paper, we present the results of the evaluation of three low-cost laser sensor</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and comparison with the standard device Metone Aerocet 531s which is capable of counting dust particles as small as 0.3 μm. The sensors used in this study are PMS5003 (Plantower), SPS30 (Sesirion), SM-UART-04L (Amphenol). During the measurement, the overall trend of the outputs from the sensors was similar to that of the Aerocet 531s. The PMS5003 sensor has a relatively small standard error in the all particle measurement ranges (<15 μg/m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the low particle concentration range). All sensors have a high linearity compared to data from standard equipment, PMS5003: PM1.0 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.89;PM2.5 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.95;PM10 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.87;SPS30 PM2.5 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.95 and PM10 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.99;SM-UART-04L PM1.0 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.98. Three main sensor calibration methods (single-point calibration, two-point calibration and multi-point curve correction) with implementation steps for each method as well as their practical applications in calibrating low-cost air quality sensors according to standard measuring equipment are also detailed illustrated.展开更多
文摘In this paper, we present the results of the evaluation of three low-cost laser sensor</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and comparison with the standard device Metone Aerocet 531s which is capable of counting dust particles as small as 0.3 μm. The sensors used in this study are PMS5003 (Plantower), SPS30 (Sesirion), SM-UART-04L (Amphenol). During the measurement, the overall trend of the outputs from the sensors was similar to that of the Aerocet 531s. The PMS5003 sensor has a relatively small standard error in the all particle measurement ranges (<15 μg/m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in the low particle concentration range). All sensors have a high linearity compared to data from standard equipment, PMS5003: PM1.0 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.89;PM2.5 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.95;PM10 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.87;SPS30 PM2.5 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.95 and PM10 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.99;SM-UART-04L PM1.0 R</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.98. Three main sensor calibration methods (single-point calibration, two-point calibration and multi-point curve correction) with implementation steps for each method as well as their practical applications in calibrating low-cost air quality sensors according to standard measuring equipment are also detailed illustrated.
