目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹...目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹板固定骨折,手术内固定组176例使用切开复位钢板或髓内针固定骨折。对两组间并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等参数进行比较。结果:平均随访(31.24±20.06)个月。两组数据在年龄、开放骨折数量、骨折部位和AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)分类方面差异没有统计学意义。骨折愈合率:保守治疗组96.1%(73/76),手术内固定组97.7%(172/176),P=0.46;骨折愈合时间:保守治疗组(10.24±2.93)周,手术内固定组(10.69±2.51)周,P=0.22;并发症发生率:保守治疗组5.3%(4/76例),手术内固定组15.3%(27/176例),P=0.025;其中骨折不愈合率:保守治疗组3.95%(3/76),手术内固定组2.3%(4/176),P=0.43;桡神经损伤:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.7%(10/176),P=0.035;骨劈裂:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组1.7%(3/176),P=0.556;肘僵硬:保守治疗组1.3%(1/76),手术内固定组0.6%(1/176),P=1.000;肩痛:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.1%(9/176),P=0.061。Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分:保守治疗组(97.37±4.94)分,手术内固定组(96.34±6.88)分,P=0.24;Mayo肘关节功能评分:保守治疗组(99.80±1.72)分,手术内固定组(99.49±2.73)分,P=0.36。结论:肱骨干骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效相当,但并发症少。展开更多
Purpose： To study the effects of surgical and nonoperative treatment on wrist function in patients with distal radius fracture. Methods： In total, 97 patients treated for distal radius fracture in the Department of ...Purpose： To study the effects of surgical and nonoperative treatment on wrist function in patients with distal radius fracture. Methods： In total, 97 patients treated for distal radius fracture in the Department of Orthopedic Trauma at the People＇s Hospital of Peking University from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2016 were selected for outpatient follow-up, including manipulative reduction and dorsal splint fixation in 24 cases, bivalve cast fixation in 19 cases and open reduction and internal fixation in 54 cases. Evaluation was based on Sartiento＇s modification of the Gartland and Werley score. Efficacy was assessed with wrist pain as the focus. Results： The wrist function scores of the surgical group were better than nonoperative groups. There was no significant difference in wrist function scores between the dorsal splint group and the bivalve cast group. The ulnar wrist pain incidence had no significant difference in surgical and nonoperative groups. The displace rate in dorsal splint group was higher than other groups. Conclusion： The overall effect of surgical treatment of distal radius fracture is better than nonoperative treatment. The ulnar wrist pain incidence has no significant difference in these groups. Dorsal splint fixation is more prone to displace than bivalve cast fixation.展开更多
文摘目的:比较肱骨干骨折手术与非手术治疗方法的临床疗效,以期指导临床选择。方法:连续入选2005年3月至2012年10月间有完整随访资料的患者252例,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为保守治疗组和手术内固定组,其中保守治疗组76例使用石膏或小夹板固定骨折,手术内固定组176例使用切开复位钢板或髓内针固定骨折。对两组间并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等参数进行比较。结果:平均随访(31.24±20.06)个月。两组数据在年龄、开放骨折数量、骨折部位和AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)分类方面差异没有统计学意义。骨折愈合率:保守治疗组96.1%(73/76),手术内固定组97.7%(172/176),P=0.46;骨折愈合时间:保守治疗组(10.24±2.93)周,手术内固定组(10.69±2.51)周,P=0.22;并发症发生率:保守治疗组5.3%(4/76例),手术内固定组15.3%(27/176例),P=0.025;其中骨折不愈合率:保守治疗组3.95%(3/76),手术内固定组2.3%(4/176),P=0.43;桡神经损伤:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.7%(10/176),P=0.035;骨劈裂:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组1.7%(3/176),P=0.556;肘僵硬:保守治疗组1.3%(1/76),手术内固定组0.6%(1/176),P=1.000;肩痛:保守治疗组0%(0/76),手术内固定组5.1%(9/176),P=0.061。Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分:保守治疗组(97.37±4.94)分,手术内固定组(96.34±6.88)分,P=0.24;Mayo肘关节功能评分:保守治疗组(99.80±1.72)分,手术内固定组(99.49±2.73)分,P=0.36。结论:肱骨干骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效相当,但并发症少。
文摘Purpose： To study the effects of surgical and nonoperative treatment on wrist function in patients with distal radius fracture. Methods： In total, 97 patients treated for distal radius fracture in the Department of Orthopedic Trauma at the People＇s Hospital of Peking University from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2016 were selected for outpatient follow-up, including manipulative reduction and dorsal splint fixation in 24 cases, bivalve cast fixation in 19 cases and open reduction and internal fixation in 54 cases. Evaluation was based on Sartiento＇s modification of the Gartland and Werley score. Efficacy was assessed with wrist pain as the focus. Results： The wrist function scores of the surgical group were better than nonoperative groups. There was no significant difference in wrist function scores between the dorsal splint group and the bivalve cast group. The ulnar wrist pain incidence had no significant difference in surgical and nonoperative groups. The displace rate in dorsal splint group was higher than other groups. Conclusion： The overall effect of surgical treatment of distal radius fracture is better than nonoperative treatment. The ulnar wrist pain incidence has no significant difference in these groups. Dorsal splint fixation is more prone to displace than bivalve cast fixation.
