AIM: To evaluate the impact of splenectomy on longterm survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients with gastric cancer by performing a metaanalysis METHODS: A search of electronic databases to identi...AIM: To evaluate the impact of splenectomy on longterm survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients with gastric cancer by performing a metaanalysis METHODS: A search of electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials in The Cochrane Library trials register, Mediine, CBMdisc (Chinese Biomedical Database) and J-STAGE, etc was performed. Data was extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. Outcome measures were survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality and operation-related events. The meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 4.3. RESULTS: Three studies comprising 466 patients were available for analysis, with 231 patients treated by gastrectomy plus splenectomy. Splenectomy could not increase the 5-year overall survival rate [RR = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.41]. The postoperative morbidity (RR = 1.76, 95% CI 0.82-3.80) or mortality (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.45-5.50) did not suggest any significant differences between the 2 groups. No significant differences were noted in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, length of hospital stay and reoperation rate. Subgroup analyses showed splenectomy did not increase the survival rate for proximal and whole gastric cancer. No obvious differences were observed between the 2 groups when stratified by stage. Sensitivity analyses indicated no significant differences regarding the survival rates (P 〉 0.05). CONCLUSION: Splenectomy did not show a beneficial effect on survival rates compared to splenic preservation. Routinely performing splenectomy should not be recommended.展开更多
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery strategies are increasingly implemented to improve the management of surgical patients.AIM To evaluate the effects of new perioperative fasting protocols in children≥3 mo of...BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery strategies are increasingly implemented to improve the management of surgical patients.AIM To evaluate the effects of new perioperative fasting protocols in children≥3 mo of age undergoing non-gastrointestinal surgery.METHODS This prospective pilot study included children≥3 mo of age undergoing nongastrointestinal surgery at the Children’s Hospital(Zhejiang University School of Medicine)from January 2020 to June 2020.The children were divided into either a conventional group or an ERAS group according to whether they had been enrolled before or after the implementation of the new perioperative fasting strategy.The children in the conventional group were fasted using conventional strategies,while those in the ERAS group were given individualized fasting protocols preoperatively(6-h fasting for infant formula/non-human milk/solids,4-h fasting for breast milk,and clear fluids allowed within 2 h of surgery)and postoperatively(food permitted from 1 h after surgery).Pre-operative and postoperative fasting times,pre-operative blood glucose,the incidence of postoperative thirst and hunger,the incidence of perioperative vomiting and aspiration,and the degree of satisfaction were evaluated.RESULTS The study included 303 patients(151 in the conventional group and 152 in the ERAS group).Compared with the conventional group,the ERAS group had a shorter pre-operative food fasting time[11.92(4.00,19.33)vs 13.00(6.00,20.28)h,P<0.001],shorter preoperative liquid fasting time[3.00(2.00,7.50)vs 12.00(3.00,20.28)h,P<0.001],higher preoperative blood glucose level[5.6(4.2,8.2)vs 5.1(4.0,7.4)mmol/L,P<0.001],lower incidence of thirst(74.5%vs 15.3%,P<0.001),shorter time to postoperative feeding[1.17(0.33,6.83)vs 6.00(5.40,9.20),P<0.001],and greater satisfaction[7(0,10)vs 8(5,10),P<0.001].No children experienced perioperative aspiration.The incidences of hunger,perioperative vomiting,and fever were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION Optimizing fasting and clear fl展开更多
基金Supported by The Multi-disciplinary Treatment Project of Gastrointestinal Tumors,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chinathe National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC),No.30600591
文摘AIM: To evaluate the impact of splenectomy on longterm survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients with gastric cancer by performing a metaanalysis METHODS: A search of electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials in The Cochrane Library trials register, Mediine, CBMdisc (Chinese Biomedical Database) and J-STAGE, etc was performed. Data was extracted from the studies by 2 independent reviewers. Outcome measures were survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality and operation-related events. The meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 4.3. RESULTS: Three studies comprising 466 patients were available for analysis, with 231 patients treated by gastrectomy plus splenectomy. Splenectomy could not increase the 5-year overall survival rate [RR = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.41]. The postoperative morbidity (RR = 1.76, 95% CI 0.82-3.80) or mortality (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.45-5.50) did not suggest any significant differences between the 2 groups. No significant differences were noted in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes, operation time, length of hospital stay and reoperation rate. Subgroup analyses showed splenectomy did not increase the survival rate for proximal and whole gastric cancer. No obvious differences were observed between the 2 groups when stratified by stage. Sensitivity analyses indicated no significant differences regarding the survival rates (P 〉 0.05). CONCLUSION: Splenectomy did not show a beneficial effect on survival rates compared to splenic preservation. Routinely performing splenectomy should not be recommended.
基金Supported by the Health Science and Technology Plan of Zhejiang Province in 2022,No.2022KY867.
文摘BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery strategies are increasingly implemented to improve the management of surgical patients.AIM To evaluate the effects of new perioperative fasting protocols in children≥3 mo of age undergoing non-gastrointestinal surgery.METHODS This prospective pilot study included children≥3 mo of age undergoing nongastrointestinal surgery at the Children’s Hospital(Zhejiang University School of Medicine)from January 2020 to June 2020.The children were divided into either a conventional group or an ERAS group according to whether they had been enrolled before or after the implementation of the new perioperative fasting strategy.The children in the conventional group were fasted using conventional strategies,while those in the ERAS group were given individualized fasting protocols preoperatively(6-h fasting for infant formula/non-human milk/solids,4-h fasting for breast milk,and clear fluids allowed within 2 h of surgery)and postoperatively(food permitted from 1 h after surgery).Pre-operative and postoperative fasting times,pre-operative blood glucose,the incidence of postoperative thirst and hunger,the incidence of perioperative vomiting and aspiration,and the degree of satisfaction were evaluated.RESULTS The study included 303 patients(151 in the conventional group and 152 in the ERAS group).Compared with the conventional group,the ERAS group had a shorter pre-operative food fasting time[11.92(4.00,19.33)vs 13.00(6.00,20.28)h,P<0.001],shorter preoperative liquid fasting time[3.00(2.00,7.50)vs 12.00(3.00,20.28)h,P<0.001],higher preoperative blood glucose level[5.6(4.2,8.2)vs 5.1(4.0,7.4)mmol/L,P<0.001],lower incidence of thirst(74.5%vs 15.3%,P<0.001),shorter time to postoperative feeding[1.17(0.33,6.83)vs 6.00(5.40,9.20),P<0.001],and greater satisfaction[7(0,10)vs 8(5,10),P<0.001].No children experienced perioperative aspiration.The incidences of hunger,perioperative vomiting,and fever were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION Optimizing fasting and clear fl