BACKGROUND The long-term survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)following anatomical resection(AR)vs non-anatomical resection(NAR)is still controversial.It is necessary to investigate which ap...BACKGROUND The long-term survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)following anatomical resection(AR)vs non-anatomical resection(NAR)is still controversial.It is necessary to investigate which approach is better for patients with solitary HCC.AIM To compare perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of AR and NAR for solitary HCC.METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed,Medline(Ovid),Embase(Ovid),and Cochrane Library.Participants of any age and sex,who underwent liver resection,were considered following the following criteria:(1)Studies reporting AR vs NAR liver resection;(2)Studies focused on primary HCC with a solitary tumor;(3)Studies reporting the long-term survival outcomes(>5 years);and(4)Studies including patients without history of preoperative treatment.The main results were overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS).Perioperative outcomes were also compared.RESULTS A total of 14 studies,published between 2001 and 2020,were included in our meta-analysis,including 9444 patients who were mainly from China,Japan,and Korea.AR was performed on 4260(44.8%)patients.The synthetic results showed that the 5-year OS[odds ratio(OR):1.19;P<0.001]and DFS(OR:1.26;P<0.001)were significantly better in the AR group than in the NAR group.AR was associated with longer operating time[mean difference(MD):47.08;P<0.001],more blood loss(MD:169.29;P=0.001),and wider surgical margin(MD=1.35;P=0.04)compared to NAR.There was no obvious difference in blood transfusion ratio(OR:1.16;P=0.65)or postoperative complications(OR:1.24,P=0.18).CONCLUSION AR is superior to NAR in terms of long-term outcomes.Thus,AR can be recommended as a reasonable surgical option in patients with solitary HCC.展开更多
目的:对比解剖性肝叶切除手术(AH)与非解剖性肝叶切除手术(NAH)治疗原发性肝癌(PHC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年3月期间我院收治的103例PHC患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为对照组(n=54)和研究组(n=49),对照...目的:对比解剖性肝叶切除手术(AH)与非解剖性肝叶切除手术(NAH)治疗原发性肝癌(PHC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年3月期间我院收治的103例PHC患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为对照组(n=54)和研究组(n=49),对照组给予NAH治疗,研究组给予AH治疗,比较两组围术期指标、黑色素瘤抗原-1(MAGE-1)m RNA、甲胎蛋白(AFP)m RNA阳性表达、肝功能指标、术后并发症及复发转移情况。结果:两组患者术后7d丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBIL)均升高,但研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量、术中输血量、术后引流量少于对照组(P<0.05),研究组手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后28d的MAGE-1 m RNA、AFP m RNA阳性表达率均有所降低,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率以及复发转移率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与NAH术式相比,AH治疗PHC患者可有效减轻肝功能损害,下调MAGE-1 m RNA、AFP m RNA阳性表达,降低术后并发症及复发转移发生率。展开更多
基金Supported by National Key Technologies RD Program,No.2018YFC1106803National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81872004,No.81770615,and No.81672882Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province,No.2019YFQ0001 and No.2017SZ0003。
文摘BACKGROUND The long-term survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)following anatomical resection(AR)vs non-anatomical resection(NAR)is still controversial.It is necessary to investigate which approach is better for patients with solitary HCC.AIM To compare perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of AR and NAR for solitary HCC.METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed,Medline(Ovid),Embase(Ovid),and Cochrane Library.Participants of any age and sex,who underwent liver resection,were considered following the following criteria:(1)Studies reporting AR vs NAR liver resection;(2)Studies focused on primary HCC with a solitary tumor;(3)Studies reporting the long-term survival outcomes(>5 years);and(4)Studies including patients without history of preoperative treatment.The main results were overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS).Perioperative outcomes were also compared.RESULTS A total of 14 studies,published between 2001 and 2020,were included in our meta-analysis,including 9444 patients who were mainly from China,Japan,and Korea.AR was performed on 4260(44.8%)patients.The synthetic results showed that the 5-year OS[odds ratio(OR):1.19;P<0.001]and DFS(OR:1.26;P<0.001)were significantly better in the AR group than in the NAR group.AR was associated with longer operating time[mean difference(MD):47.08;P<0.001],more blood loss(MD:169.29;P=0.001),and wider surgical margin(MD=1.35;P=0.04)compared to NAR.There was no obvious difference in blood transfusion ratio(OR:1.16;P=0.65)or postoperative complications(OR:1.24,P=0.18).CONCLUSION AR is superior to NAR in terms of long-term outcomes.Thus,AR can be recommended as a reasonable surgical option in patients with solitary HCC.
文摘目的:对比解剖性肝叶切除手术(AH)与非解剖性肝叶切除手术(NAH)治疗原发性肝癌(PHC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年3月期间我院收治的103例PHC患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为对照组(n=54)和研究组(n=49),对照组给予NAH治疗,研究组给予AH治疗,比较两组围术期指标、黑色素瘤抗原-1(MAGE-1)m RNA、甲胎蛋白(AFP)m RNA阳性表达、肝功能指标、术后并发症及复发转移情况。结果:两组患者术后7d丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBIL)均升高,但研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量、术中输血量、术后引流量少于对照组(P<0.05),研究组手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后28d的MAGE-1 m RNA、AFP m RNA阳性表达率均有所降低,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率以及复发转移率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与NAH术式相比,AH治疗PHC患者可有效减轻肝功能损害,下调MAGE-1 m RNA、AFP m RNA阳性表达,降低术后并发症及复发转移发生率。
