期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
单核细胞计数与高密度脂蛋白比值联合单核细胞/大血小板比率检测对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期肺栓塞危险分层诊断效能
1
作者 高栋材 杨慧俐 +1 位作者 郎伟宇 刘亮 《安徽医药》 CAS 2024年第3期608-613,共6页
目的 探讨单核细胞计数与高密度脂蛋白比值(MHR)联合单核细胞/大血小板比率(MLPR)检测对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)肺栓塞危险分层诊断效能。方法 回顾2018年5月至2022年5月长治市人民医院收治的233例老年AECOPD并发肺栓... 目的 探讨单核细胞计数与高密度脂蛋白比值(MHR)联合单核细胞/大血小板比率(MLPR)检测对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)肺栓塞危险分层诊断效能。方法 回顾2018年5月至2022年5月长治市人民医院收治的233例老年AECOPD并发肺栓塞病人的临床资料,比较不同危险分层病人MHR、MLPR水平,并分析MHR、MLPR与危险分层的相关性。采用多元有序logistic回归分析明确MHR、MLPR与AECOPD肺栓塞危险分层的关系,并评估其对危险分层的预测价值。结果高危组病人MHR、MLPR分别为0.74(0.70,0.86)、1.83(1.52,2.10),高于非高危组的0.55(0.39,0.62)、0.80(0.59,1.27)(P<0.05);中高危组和中低危组的MHR分别为0.62(0.57,0.71)、0.39(0.31,0.56),MLPR分别为1.32(0.75,1.61)、0.64(0.55,0.90),高危组MHR、MLPR高于中高危组,中高危组高于中低危组(P<0.05)。Spearman分析显示,MHR、MLPR水平与危险分层均呈正相关(P<0.001)。多元有序logistic结果显示年龄>80岁、白蛋白降低、血肌酐升高、MHR升高、MLPR升高均是老年AECOPD伴肺栓塞中高危和高危分层的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC分析显示,MHR、MLPR对肺栓塞高危与非高危分层诊断AUC及其95%CI为0.92(0.88,0.95)、0.93(0.89,0.96),低于二者联合诊断效能0.97(0.94,0.99)(P<0.05);MHR、MLPR单独对肺栓塞中危病人分层诊断AUC及其95%CI为0.89(0.83,0.93)、0.84(0.78,0.89),低于二者联合诊断效能0.95(0.91,0.98)(P<0.05)。结论MHR、MLPR可作为老年AECOPD肺栓塞病人早期危险分层的可靠参考指标。 展开更多
关键词 肺疾病 慢性阻塞性 肺栓塞 危险分层 单核细胞计数与高密度脂蛋白比值 单核细胞/大血小板比率
下载PDF
The Value of MLPR,NLR,and RDW in the Assessment of Combined Pulmonary Embolism in Elderly Patients with AECOPD
2
作者 Ya Zhang Jianye Yang 《Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research》 2024年第7期255-260,共6页
Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of the monocyte-to-large-platelet ratio(MLPR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),and red blood cell distribution width(RDW)for pulmonary embolism(PE)in patients with acut... Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of the monocyte-to-large-platelet ratio(MLPR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),and red blood cell distribution width(RDW)for pulmonary embolism(PE)in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods:A total of 60 elderly AECOPD patients were enrolled and divided into embolus group(12 cases)and thrombus group(48 cases)according to whether they were combined with pulmonary embolism and the MLPR,NLR,and RDW values of the two groups were determined respectively.Results:The patients in the two groups had different degrees of vascular structural and functional abnormalities,and the MLPR,NLR,and RDW in the embolus group were significantly higher than those in the thrombus group(P<0.05);while the differences in NLR and RDW between the two groups were not significant.Conclusion:MLPR,NLR,and RDW can provide an objective basis for assessing PE in elderly AECOPD patients. 展开更多
关键词 monocyte-to-large-platelet ratio(MLPR) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) Red blood cell distribution width(RDW) Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) Pulmonary embolism
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部