ASEAN countries are important targets for the United States to promote the “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework. Their official, think tank, and media opinions regard this as an important opportunity to enhance the...ASEAN countries are important targets for the United States to promote the “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework. Their official, think tank, and media opinions regard this as an important opportunity to enhance their national status and promote their national interests, which will be beneficial to peace and stability in the “Indo–Pacific” region. However, they are worried that it will damage the “ASEAN centrality.” ASEAN has responded positively and is committed to reshaping its “central position” and regional leadership and improving regional governance capabilities, but there are differences in the responses of various countries. In the future, ASEAN countries will seek to achieve direct and practical interests through the US “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework, but they are more wor ried that the “central position of ASEAN” will be replaced and its “neutral and balanced” position will be threatened.展开更多
Over the past decade,a series of minilateral cooperative endeavors have emerged in the Asia-Pacific region,which have become a new phenomenon in this region.Unlike the regional multilateralism that followed the Cold W...Over the past decade,a series of minilateral cooperative endeavors have emerged in the Asia-Pacific region,which have become a new phenomenon in this region.Unlike the regional multilateralism that followed the Cold War,this round of minilateral cooperation has taken on new features,including de-ASEANization,strong ideological color,and an emphasis on security issues.The rise of this pattern of minilateral cooperation is related to regional countries’dissatisfaction with existing multilateral mechanisms and the strategies adopted by relevant countries to deal with the regional changes.However,this has had a relatively negative effect on inter-state relations and the regional order in the Asia-Pacific region,which has attracted attention from all corners.展开更多
基金a phased result of a project supported by the National Social Science Fund of China in 2020 entitled “The Reconstruction of ‘ASEAN Centrality’ in the Context of ‘Indo–Pacific’ Strategy”(Grant Number:20CGJ029)。
文摘ASEAN countries are important targets for the United States to promote the “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework. Their official, think tank, and media opinions regard this as an important opportunity to enhance their national status and promote their national interests, which will be beneficial to peace and stability in the “Indo–Pacific” region. However, they are worried that it will damage the “ASEAN centrality.” ASEAN has responded positively and is committed to reshaping its “central position” and regional leadership and improving regional governance capabilities, but there are differences in the responses of various countries. In the future, ASEAN countries will seek to achieve direct and practical interests through the US “Indo–Pacific” minilateral framework, but they are more wor ried that the “central position of ASEAN” will be replaced and its “neutral and balanced” position will be threatened.
基金a stage research result of the key project of National Social Science Fund“Research on Indo-Pacific Maritime Corridor Security System under the Background of Belt and Road”(Project Approval No.19AGJ002)。
文摘Over the past decade,a series of minilateral cooperative endeavors have emerged in the Asia-Pacific region,which have become a new phenomenon in this region.Unlike the regional multilateralism that followed the Cold War,this round of minilateral cooperation has taken on new features,including de-ASEANization,strong ideological color,and an emphasis on security issues.The rise of this pattern of minilateral cooperation is related to regional countries’dissatisfaction with existing multilateral mechanisms and the strategies adopted by relevant countries to deal with the regional changes.However,this has had a relatively negative effect on inter-state relations and the regional order in the Asia-Pacific region,which has attracted attention from all corners.
