The purpose of this research is to apply the Einstein’s principle of relativity to solve the mind-brain problem and to generate all Standard Model Particle masses. Our approach is somewhat analogous to the dualistic ...The purpose of this research is to apply the Einstein’s principle of relativity to solve the mind-brain problem and to generate all Standard Model Particle masses. Our approach is somewhat analogous to the dualistic idea of Descartes. Instead of a pineal gland, wherein the brain interacts with the mind, we propose during the developmental stages of the human fetus the tiny brain begins to communicate with the smallest structures of spacetime. This interaction occurs as the fetus brain begins to emit thermodynamic low heat energies, which are then absorbed into the smallest structures of spacetime saturating the interstices of the fetus brain. Think of these heat-energies like Morse code instructions. Since these kinds of interaction involve spacetime, with brain matter-energy, and that our main guiding principle is that of relativity, our research resulted in a general relativistic wave equation, wherein the n-valued heat-energies emitted by the brain-field-matrix <em style="white-space:normal;">B</em><sub style="white-space:normal;"><span style="white-space:nowrap;"><em>μ</em></span><em></em><em>v</em></sub>, is identified as the energy momentum tensor of general relativity. The spacetime mind-matrix (<em style="white-space:normal;">M</em><sub style="white-space:normal;"><em><em>μ</em><em></em><em>v</em></em></sub>) is likewise identified as the Riemannian curvature matrix. Together they form a general relativistic expression given by: <em>M</em><sub><em><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"></em><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;">v</em><span style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"> </span></em></sub>+<em>P</em><sub><em><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"></em><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;">v</em><span style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"> </span></em></sub><em>M=cB<sub><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:nor展开更多
For centuries, the question of how a physical structure (the brain) generates the subjective feeling of consciousness has plagued neuroscientists, physiologists, psychologists, linguists, and philosophers. This has be...For centuries, the question of how a physical structure (the brain) generates the subjective feeling of consciousness has plagued neuroscientists, physiologists, psychologists, linguists, and philosophers. This has become known as the “hard problem of consciousness” and has been the subject of many publications. Although lots of answers have been proposed, none has been completely satisfactory. The focus of most of these studies has been on the neuronal structures and activities. Experiential consciousness emerges from neural processes, but it has not been explained with models that have been based solely on the electro-mechanical aspects of the processes. There must be some other dynamic features of neuronal activity to explain the emergence of experiential consciousness. I argue that a likely answer to the dilemma resides in the added dimension of the neurochemistry of the brain that has, so far, received little attention.展开更多
文摘The purpose of this research is to apply the Einstein’s principle of relativity to solve the mind-brain problem and to generate all Standard Model Particle masses. Our approach is somewhat analogous to the dualistic idea of Descartes. Instead of a pineal gland, wherein the brain interacts with the mind, we propose during the developmental stages of the human fetus the tiny brain begins to communicate with the smallest structures of spacetime. This interaction occurs as the fetus brain begins to emit thermodynamic low heat energies, which are then absorbed into the smallest structures of spacetime saturating the interstices of the fetus brain. Think of these heat-energies like Morse code instructions. Since these kinds of interaction involve spacetime, with brain matter-energy, and that our main guiding principle is that of relativity, our research resulted in a general relativistic wave equation, wherein the n-valued heat-energies emitted by the brain-field-matrix <em style="white-space:normal;">B</em><sub style="white-space:normal;"><span style="white-space:nowrap;"><em>μ</em></span><em></em><em>v</em></sub>, is identified as the energy momentum tensor of general relativity. The spacetime mind-matrix (<em style="white-space:normal;">M</em><sub style="white-space:normal;"><em><em>μ</em><em></em><em>v</em></em></sub>) is likewise identified as the Riemannian curvature matrix. Together they form a general relativistic expression given by: <em>M</em><sub><em><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"></em><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;">v</em><span style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"> </span></em></sub>+<em>P</em><sub><em><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"></em><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;">v</em><span style="font-size:10px;white-space:normal;"> </span></em></sub><em>M=cB<sub><span style="font-size:10px;"><em>μ</em></span><em style="font-size:10px;white-space:nor
文摘For centuries, the question of how a physical structure (the brain) generates the subjective feeling of consciousness has plagued neuroscientists, physiologists, psychologists, linguists, and philosophers. This has become known as the “hard problem of consciousness” and has been the subject of many publications. Although lots of answers have been proposed, none has been completely satisfactory. The focus of most of these studies has been on the neuronal structures and activities. Experiential consciousness emerges from neural processes, but it has not been explained with models that have been based solely on the electro-mechanical aspects of the processes. There must be some other dynamic features of neuronal activity to explain the emergence of experiential consciousness. I argue that a likely answer to the dilemma resides in the added dimension of the neurochemistry of the brain that has, so far, received little attention.
