BACKGROUND:Whether a major liver resection is safe has been judged mainly from the patient’s hepatic reserve.However,a safe limit for liver resection does not exist yet.This study aimed to construct a new scoring sys...BACKGROUND:Whether a major liver resection is safe has been judged mainly from the patient’s hepatic reserve.However,a safe limit for liver resection does not exist yet.This study aimed to construct a new scoring system as a guide to determine a safe limit for liver resection and avoid liver dysfunction after hepatectomy.METHODS:Eighty-six patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone hepatectomy in West China Hospital from March 2007 to June 2010 were reviewed.The patients were classified according to the levels of total bilirubin after hepatectomy and the parameters in the perioperative period were compared.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was made to assess the liver function compensatory (LFC) value to predict liver dysfunction of the patients after hepatectomy.LFC value is defined as the preoperative KICG value×22.487+standard remnant liver volume (SRLV)×0.020.RESULTS:Patients were classified into group Ⅰ (normal group,n=69) and group Ⅱ (with total bilirubin >85.5 μmol/L for 7 days after hepatectomy,n=17) based on the levels of total bilirubin after hepatectomy.Group II was further divided into two subgroups:recovered subgroup (n=14) and fatal subgroup (n=3).There were no significant differences in preoperative data or intraoperative findings except the indocyanine green test parameters (KICG and ICG R15) and SRLV.ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of an LFC value ≤13.01 were 94.1% and 82.6% respectively for predicting liver dysfunction of the patients after hepatectomy.CONCLUSIONS:The LFC value appears to be a good predictor of postoperative liver dysfunction in patients who undergo hepatectomy for HCC.An expected LFC value of 13.01 seems to be a safe limit for liver resection.展开更多
Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)may ravage normal liver tissues apart from the neoplastic nodules which offset the anti-tumor effect.This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of liver reserve function(LRF)after T...Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)may ravage normal liver tissues apart from the neoplastic nodules which offset the anti-tumor effect.This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of liver reserve function(LRF)after TACE by indocyanine green(ICG)clearance test and other routine liver function tests.Forty-six newly diagnosed HCC patients who had undergone TACE as the initial treatment from January 2011 to January 2012 were enrolled in this study.The effects of age,basic ICG clearance rate and interval time between two assessments on the recovery of LRF were analyzed.We found that ICG retention rate at the 15 minutes(ICGR15)was significantly increased after TACE(12.3±8.1%vs 16.8±12.1%,P【0.01)in all the 46 patients.In particular,the ICGR15 value was increased in older patients(age】55 years,20.3±12.5%vs 13.7±7.2%,P【0.01).The interval of ICG test also affected the ICGR15 value(≤47days,17.8±11.4%after vs 12.1±7.1%before TACE,P【0.01).Our data suggested that TACE decreased LRF,especially in older patients.ICG test was more sensitive to evaluate the recovery of LRF after TACE than the Child-Pugh grade and routine liver function tests.展开更多
Objective: To discuss some key points about nursing in the use of DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer in patients at the department of infectious diseases. Method: DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer was a...Objective: To discuss some key points about nursing in the use of DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer in patients at the department of infectious diseases. Method: DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer was applied to 5464 patients at the department of infectious diseases. The reasons for failed detection and complications related to the detection were analyzed, and the measures for improving the nursing procedures were proposed. Result: Among the 5464 patients, the detections were successful at the first attempt in 5458 patients;2 patients had leakage of liquid;2 patients were poorly prepared, and 1 case failed because of mistaken selection of CO mode, which led to adverse drug reactions;1 case did not finish the detection due to anaphylactic shock;8 patients had nausea and 6 patients had skin rash on the four limbs and torso during the detection. Conclusion: It is necessary to formulate the nursing procedures for the use of DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer. Moreover, preparatory work, health education, refined nursing procedures and skillful operations are closely related to the success rate and accuracy of the detection.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND:Whether a major liver resection is safe has been judged mainly from the patient’s hepatic reserve.However,a safe limit for liver resection does not exist yet.This study aimed to construct a new scoring system as a guide to determine a safe limit for liver resection and avoid liver dysfunction after hepatectomy.METHODS:Eighty-six patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone hepatectomy in West China Hospital from March 2007 to June 2010 were reviewed.The patients were classified according to the levels of total bilirubin after hepatectomy and the parameters in the perioperative period were compared.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was made to assess the liver function compensatory (LFC) value to predict liver dysfunction of the patients after hepatectomy.LFC value is defined as the preoperative KICG value×22.487+standard remnant liver volume (SRLV)×0.020.RESULTS:Patients were classified into group Ⅰ (normal group,n=69) and group Ⅱ (with total bilirubin >85.5 μmol/L for 7 days after hepatectomy,n=17) based on the levels of total bilirubin after hepatectomy.Group II was further divided into two subgroups:recovered subgroup (n=14) and fatal subgroup (n=3).There were no significant differences in preoperative data or intraoperative findings except the indocyanine green test parameters (KICG and ICG R15) and SRLV.ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity of an LFC value ≤13.01 were 94.1% and 82.6% respectively for predicting liver dysfunction of the patients after hepatectomy.CONCLUSIONS:The LFC value appears to be a good predictor of postoperative liver dysfunction in patients who undergo hepatectomy for HCC.An expected LFC value of 13.01 seems to be a safe limit for liver resection.
文摘Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)may ravage normal liver tissues apart from the neoplastic nodules which offset the anti-tumor effect.This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of liver reserve function(LRF)after TACE by indocyanine green(ICG)clearance test and other routine liver function tests.Forty-six newly diagnosed HCC patients who had undergone TACE as the initial treatment from January 2011 to January 2012 were enrolled in this study.The effects of age,basic ICG clearance rate and interval time between two assessments on the recovery of LRF were analyzed.We found that ICG retention rate at the 15 minutes(ICGR15)was significantly increased after TACE(12.3±8.1%vs 16.8±12.1%,P【0.01)in all the 46 patients.In particular,the ICGR15 value was increased in older patients(age】55 years,20.3±12.5%vs 13.7±7.2%,P【0.01).The interval of ICG test also affected the ICGR15 value(≤47days,17.8±11.4%after vs 12.1±7.1%before TACE,P【0.01).Our data suggested that TACE decreased LRF,especially in older patients.ICG test was more sensitive to evaluate the recovery of LRF after TACE than the Child-Pugh grade and routine liver function tests.
文摘Objective: To discuss some key points about nursing in the use of DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer in patients at the department of infectious diseases. Method: DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer was applied to 5464 patients at the department of infectious diseases. The reasons for failed detection and complications related to the detection were analyzed, and the measures for improving the nursing procedures were proposed. Result: Among the 5464 patients, the detections were successful at the first attempt in 5458 patients;2 patients had leakage of liquid;2 patients were poorly prepared, and 1 case failed because of mistaken selection of CO mode, which led to adverse drug reactions;1 case did not finish the detection due to anaphylactic shock;8 patients had nausea and 6 patients had skin rash on the four limbs and torso during the detection. Conclusion: It is necessary to formulate the nursing procedures for the use of DDG-3300K liver reserve function analyzer. Moreover, preparatory work, health education, refined nursing procedures and skillful operations are closely related to the success rate and accuracy of the detection.
