目的探讨单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术(unilateral biportal endoscopy,UBE)对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄的早期疗效。方法回顾分析2021年9月—2023年12月收治且符合选择标准的15例腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔...目的探讨单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术(unilateral biportal endoscopy,UBE)对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄的早期疗效。方法回顾分析2021年9月—2023年12月收治且符合选择标准的15例腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄患者临床资料。男5例,女10例;年龄46~83岁,平均70.3岁。手术节段:L_(4)、512例,L_(5)、S_(1)3例。病程12~30个月,平均18.7个月。所有患者均接受UBE对侧椎板下入路手术治疗。记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间以及并发症发生情况。手术前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价腰腿痛程度,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评价腰部功能,术后6个月采用MacNab标准对患者疗效进行评价。术后复查MRI和CT,观察侧隐窝和椎间孔狭窄是否去除,测量椎管横截面积(cross-sectional area of the spinal canal,CSA-SC)、椎间孔横截面积(cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen,CSA-IVF)和小关节横截面积(cross-sectional area of the facet joint,CSA-FJ)。结果手术时间55~200 min,平均127.5 min;术中出血量10~50 mL,平均27.3 mL;术后住院时间3~12 d,平均6.8 d。患者均获随访,随访时间6~12个月,平均8.9个月。术后1 d及1、3、6个月腰、腿痛VAS评分以及ODI均较术前降低,且随时间延长呈逐渐下降趋势;JOA评分则呈逐渐增高趋势;上述指标各时间点间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月根据MacNab标准评估手术疗效:优10例、良4例、可1例,优良率93.33%。影像学复查示侧隐窝及椎间孔所受压迫已明显解除,最大程度保留患侧关节突关节;术后3 d CSA-SC及CSA-IVF较术前增加、CSA-FJ较术前减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论UBE对侧椎板下入路能在保留双侧关节突关节同时,对侧隐窝及同节段椎间孔进行充分减压,早期疗效较好,有望避免腰椎医源性不稳所致的融合手术,但中、远期疗效有�展开更多
Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervert...Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellen展开更多
目的:探讨后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的安全性、可行性及短期疗效。方法:2011年8月至2012年10月,共对23例患者实施后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术。男性9例,女性14例。C4/5节段3例、C5/6节段15例、C6/...目的:探讨后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的安全性、可行性及短期疗效。方法:2011年8月至2012年10月,共对23例患者实施后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术。男性9例,女性14例。C4/5节段3例、C5/6节段15例、C6/7节段6例。单节段22例,双节段1例。相应症状均表现为神经根卡压节段性根性疼痛。全麻下患者取俯卧位,在直径6.3 mm经皮内窥镜直视下,采用磨钻去除相应节段上下关节突内侧部分及部分椎板,呈"钥匙孔"样显露,去除突出的椎间盘髓核组织,减压神经根。记录术前及术后1 d、1周、1月、3月、6月、1年患者视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)及末次随访Macnab评分。结果:手术均顺利完成,全部病例得到随访。术前及术后各时间点VAS分别为(7.35±1.05)、(2.87±0.84)、(1.85±0.42)、(1.72±0.64)、(1.40±0.75)、(0.75±1.58)、(0.77±1.08)分。术后各时间点VAS较术前明显减少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良Macnab标准评价临床疗效,优15例,良7例,可1例。结论:后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症疗效满意,安全可行,值得推广应用。展开更多
文摘目的探讨单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术(unilateral biportal endoscopy,UBE)对侧椎板下入路治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄的早期疗效。方法回顾分析2021年9月—2023年12月收治且符合选择标准的15例腰椎侧隐窝狭窄合并同节段椎间孔狭窄患者临床资料。男5例,女10例;年龄46~83岁,平均70.3岁。手术节段:L_(4)、512例,L_(5)、S_(1)3例。病程12~30个月,平均18.7个月。所有患者均接受UBE对侧椎板下入路手术治疗。记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间以及并发症发生情况。手术前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价腰腿痛程度,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评价腰部功能,术后6个月采用MacNab标准对患者疗效进行评价。术后复查MRI和CT,观察侧隐窝和椎间孔狭窄是否去除,测量椎管横截面积(cross-sectional area of the spinal canal,CSA-SC)、椎间孔横截面积(cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen,CSA-IVF)和小关节横截面积(cross-sectional area of the facet joint,CSA-FJ)。结果手术时间55~200 min,平均127.5 min;术中出血量10~50 mL,平均27.3 mL;术后住院时间3~12 d,平均6.8 d。患者均获随访,随访时间6~12个月,平均8.9个月。术后1 d及1、3、6个月腰、腿痛VAS评分以及ODI均较术前降低,且随时间延长呈逐渐下降趋势;JOA评分则呈逐渐增高趋势;上述指标各时间点间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月根据MacNab标准评估手术疗效:优10例、良4例、可1例,优良率93.33%。影像学复查示侧隐窝及椎间孔所受压迫已明显解除,最大程度保留患侧关节突关节;术后3 d CSA-SC及CSA-IVF较术前增加、CSA-FJ较术前减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论UBE对侧椎板下入路能在保留双侧关节突关节同时,对侧隐窝及同节段椎间孔进行充分减压,早期疗效较好,有望避免腰椎医源性不稳所致的融合手术,但中、远期疗效有�
基金Anhui Province from Cong Qingwu Old Chinese Medicine Studio Project.Project No:2100601.
文摘Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellen
文摘目的:探讨后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的安全性、可行性及短期疗效。方法:2011年8月至2012年10月,共对23例患者实施后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术。男性9例,女性14例。C4/5节段3例、C5/6节段15例、C6/7节段6例。单节段22例,双节段1例。相应症状均表现为神经根卡压节段性根性疼痛。全麻下患者取俯卧位,在直径6.3 mm经皮内窥镜直视下,采用磨钻去除相应节段上下关节突内侧部分及部分椎板,呈"钥匙孔"样显露,去除突出的椎间盘髓核组织,减压神经根。记录术前及术后1 d、1周、1月、3月、6月、1年患者视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)及末次随访Macnab评分。结果:手术均顺利完成,全部病例得到随访。术前及术后各时间点VAS分别为(7.35±1.05)、(2.87±0.84)、(1.85±0.42)、(1.72±0.64)、(1.40±0.75)、(0.75±1.58)、(0.77±1.08)分。术后各时间点VAS较术前明显减少,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良Macnab标准评价临床疗效,优15例,良7例,可1例。结论:后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症疗效满意,安全可行,值得推广应用。
