The Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma has evolved from its original scheme established in the 1960s-1970s, to a significantly modified system after two major consensus meetings conducted by the Intern...The Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma has evolved from its original scheme established in the 1960s-1970s, to a significantly modified system after two major consensus meetings conducted by the International Society of Urologic Pathology （ISUP） in 2005 and 2014, respectively. The Gleason grading system has been incorporated into the WHO classification of prostate cancer, the AJCC/ UICC staging system, and the NCCN guidelines as one of the key factors in treatment decision. Both pathologists and clinicians need to fully understand the principles and practice of this grading system. We here briefly review the historical aspects of the original scheme and the recent developments of Gleason grading system, focusing on major changes over the years that resulted in the modern Gleason grading system, which has led to a new ＂Grade Group＂ system proposed by the 2014 ISUP consensus, and adopted by the 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the prostate.展开更多
文摘术前预测透明细胞肾细胞癌(clear cell renal cell carcinoma,ccRCC)的分级可有效评估患者的预后并指导临床治疗,但实现精准预测是目前本领域内的一项重要问题。该研究首先确定最优建模的CT类型与网络层数,提出了一种基于改进残差网络的ccRCC的CT影像分级模型,具体包括:利用大卷积操作对图像进行原始特征提取,利用混合注意力模块通过计算特征图中当前空间和临近空间以及当前空间和远距离空间之间的信息交互获取更多有用的特征,使得原始图像特征图在通道维度与空间维度上进行自适应特征细化,利用四个深度卷积网络层提取图像深度特征,并利用改进通道注意力模块产生通道注意力特征图信息,提取更多通道上的交互信息。实验结果表明,增强CT实质期图像和34层残差网络最有利于分级预测模型的开发,所提出的模型的总体加权准确率、AUC、精度、召回率和F1分数分别为90.8%、0.897、90.5%、90.8%、90.9%,各项指标优于其他常见网络结构,因此,该模型在预测ccRCC的国际泌尿病理学学会(International Society of Urological Pathology,ISUP)分级方面有良好的效能,对患者的临床辅助诊断和预后治疗具有重要的理论指导意义。
基金supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81272848, 81272820, 81302225, 81572540)
文摘The Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma has evolved from its original scheme established in the 1960s-1970s, to a significantly modified system after two major consensus meetings conducted by the International Society of Urologic Pathology （ISUP） in 2005 and 2014, respectively. The Gleason grading system has been incorporated into the WHO classification of prostate cancer, the AJCC/ UICC staging system, and the NCCN guidelines as one of the key factors in treatment decision. Both pathologists and clinicians need to fully understand the principles and practice of this grading system. We here briefly review the historical aspects of the original scheme and the recent developments of Gleason grading system, focusing on major changes over the years that resulted in the modern Gleason grading system, which has led to a new ＂Grade Group＂ system proposed by the 2014 ISUP consensus, and adopted by the 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the prostate.
