<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background: </strong></span>This study aimed to determine the impact of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)...<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background: </strong></span>This study aimed to determine the impact of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on myocardial function assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography.<span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conventional two-dimensional echocardiography</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><i> </i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myocardial tissue peak velocities were recorded at the lateral, ant.septal, post.septal, posterior, ant. and inferior angles of the mitral annulus as well as at the lateral tricuspid annulus by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler echocardiography before PCI, as well as 1 day and 6 weeks after intervention.</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Fifty consecutive patients with chronic stable angina and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preserved systolic left ventricular function (mean age, 58.3 ± 6.594 years;32 men) undergoing PCI were studied. Conventional echocardiographic revealed no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-PCI (1 day after PCI and 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weeks after PCI) as regarding trans-mitral and trans-tricuspid flow velocities except as regarding LVEDD, LVESD and LVEF which showed a significant improvement post-PCI. Compared with pre-interventional values, systolic peak velocity and early diastolic velocities improved at all sites (P ≤ </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.05 for each). The most pronounced improvement occurred in the septal area. Similarly, late diastolic velocities improved at all sites (P ≤ <展开更多
Objective: To investigate the treatment effect of essential hypertension based on health education. Methods: A randomized controlled field intervention trial was used in this study, patients with essential hypertensio...Objective: To investigate the treatment effect of essential hypertension based on health education. Methods: A randomized controlled field intervention trial was used in this study, patients with essential hypertension treated in community health services were subjects investigated, and psychological intervention should be carried out based on pharmaceutical services, to evaluate the effect of psychological intervention model based on pharmaceutical care on blood pressure control and overall health improvement in patients with essential hypertension. Results: Before treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure had no significant difference between two groups, P > 0.05. After treatment, SBP and DBP in two groups were significantly decreased compared to that before treatment in the same group. After treatment, SBP and DBP in the intervention group were significantly decreased compared with normal group, P 0.05). After treatment, the scores of the physiological health subscale and the total scale of the control group, the scores of each subscale and the total amount of the intervention group were significantly higher than those before the same group, the difference was statistically significant (P Conclusion: Under the background of the new round of medical and health system reforms, this model will help health workers and community residents establish new types of doctor-patient relationship and improve the quality of life of chronic diseases such as hypertension.展开更多
目的探讨综合护理行为干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏及生活质量的影响。方法将80例乳腺癌术后化疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各40例。对照组接受常规护理;观察组在接受常规护理的基础上行心理认知干预、饮食干预、运动干预、音...目的探讨综合护理行为干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏及生活质量的影响。方法将80例乳腺癌术后化疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各40例。对照组接受常规护理;观察组在接受常规护理的基础上行心理认知干预、饮食干预、运动干预、音乐干预、患侧功能锻炼等综合护理行为干预。干预前后对两组分别采用美国Andorson癌症中心疼痛研究小组研制的大五人格量表(Big Five Inventory,BFI)对患者进行癌因性疲乏(Cancer Related Fatigue,CRF)评估和欧洲癌症治疗与研究组织的生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ-C30),比较两组的癌因性疲乏状况和整体生活质量。使用Excel 2003软件及SPSS 17.0统计软件进行分析。计量资料用(xˉ±s)表示,采用t检验;计数资料用百分比表示,采用χ2检验,以P﹤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果观察组采综合护理行为干预后,癌因性疲乏程度较对照组明显减轻(χ2=18.77),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.005);干预后观察组的总体生活质量与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.005)。结论综合护理行为干预方法优于常规护理方法,可消除或缓解乳腺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏程度,提高患者的生存质量。展开更多
文摘<span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Background: </strong></span>This study aimed to determine the impact of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on myocardial function assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography.<span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conventional two-dimensional echocardiography</span><b> </b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><i> </i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Myocardial tissue peak velocities were recorded at the lateral, ant.septal, post.septal, posterior, ant. and inferior angles of the mitral annulus as well as at the lateral tricuspid annulus by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler echocardiography before PCI, as well as 1 day and 6 weeks after intervention.</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Fifty consecutive patients with chronic stable angina and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preserved systolic left ventricular function (mean age, 58.3 ± 6.594 years;32 men) undergoing PCI were studied. Conventional echocardiographic revealed no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-PCI (1 day after PCI and 6</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weeks after PCI) as regarding trans-mitral and trans-tricuspid flow velocities except as regarding LVEDD, LVESD and LVEF which showed a significant improvement post-PCI. Compared with pre-interventional values, systolic peak velocity and early diastolic velocities improved at all sites (P ≤ </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.05 for each). The most pronounced improvement occurred in the septal area. Similarly, late diastolic velocities improved at all sites (P ≤ <
文摘Objective: To investigate the treatment effect of essential hypertension based on health education. Methods: A randomized controlled field intervention trial was used in this study, patients with essential hypertension treated in community health services were subjects investigated, and psychological intervention should be carried out based on pharmaceutical services, to evaluate the effect of psychological intervention model based on pharmaceutical care on blood pressure control and overall health improvement in patients with essential hypertension. Results: Before treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure had no significant difference between two groups, P > 0.05. After treatment, SBP and DBP in two groups were significantly decreased compared to that before treatment in the same group. After treatment, SBP and DBP in the intervention group were significantly decreased compared with normal group, P 0.05). After treatment, the scores of the physiological health subscale and the total scale of the control group, the scores of each subscale and the total amount of the intervention group were significantly higher than those before the same group, the difference was statistically significant (P Conclusion: Under the background of the new round of medical and health system reforms, this model will help health workers and community residents establish new types of doctor-patient relationship and improve the quality of life of chronic diseases such as hypertension.
文摘目的探讨综合护理行为干预对乳腺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏及生活质量的影响。方法将80例乳腺癌术后化疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各40例。对照组接受常规护理;观察组在接受常规护理的基础上行心理认知干预、饮食干预、运动干预、音乐干预、患侧功能锻炼等综合护理行为干预。干预前后对两组分别采用美国Andorson癌症中心疼痛研究小组研制的大五人格量表(Big Five Inventory,BFI)对患者进行癌因性疲乏(Cancer Related Fatigue,CRF)评估和欧洲癌症治疗与研究组织的生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ-C30),比较两组的癌因性疲乏状况和整体生活质量。使用Excel 2003软件及SPSS 17.0统计软件进行分析。计量资料用(xˉ±s)表示,采用t检验;计数资料用百分比表示,采用χ2检验,以P﹤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果观察组采综合护理行为干预后,癌因性疲乏程度较对照组明显减轻(χ2=18.77),前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.005);干预后观察组的总体生活质量与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.005)。结论综合护理行为干预方法优于常规护理方法,可消除或缓解乳腺癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏程度,提高患者的生存质量。
