目的:观察颈椎前路椎体骨化物复合体可控前移(anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion,ACAF)技术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament,OPLL)的脊髓原位减压效果。方法:回顾分析2017年6...目的:观察颈椎前路椎体骨化物复合体可控前移(anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion,ACAF)技术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament,OPLL)的脊髓原位减压效果。方法:回顾分析2017年6月~2018年12月我院收治的78例OPLL患者的人口学信息、影像资料以及术后指标(年龄、性别、症状持续时间、椎管侵占率和骨化累及椎体数量)。其中采用ACAF治疗42例,单开门椎管扩大椎板成形术(简称单开门椎板成形术open-door laminoplasty,LAM)治疗36例,平均随访时间21.7±4.0(12~30)个月。比较两组患者术前及末次随访时的JOA评分、脊髓面积、Cobb角、Kang′s分级以及C5神经麻痹、脑脊液漏、吞咽困难等并发症情况。结果:末次随访时,ACAF组与LAM组相比,在JOA评分(14.17±0.81分vs 13.81±1.12分,P<0.05)、脊髓面积(74.12±4.48mm^2 vs 70.36±5.60mm^2,P<0.05)、Cobb角(20.07°±1.28°vs 9.99°±0.65°,P<0.05)和Kang′s分级(0.93±1.40 vs 2.00±0.89,P<0.05)方面具有优势。对比ACAF组与LAM组的术后并发症,两组间C5神经麻痹(4.8%vs 11.1%)、脑脊液漏(2.4%vs 2.8%)、吞咽困难(9.5%vs 0%)无统计学差异。ACAF组2例出现C5神经麻痹的患者未能顺利完成原位减压。结论:ACAF手术可通过恢复椎管容积和形态实现脊髓原位减压,减压效果良好。在恢复颈椎曲度和脊髓位置形态方面,ACAF较LAM为优。展开更多
For severe cubital tunnel syndrome, patients with absent sensory nerve action potential tend to have more severe nerve damage than those without. Thus, it is speculated that such patients generally have a poor prognos...For severe cubital tunnel syndrome, patients with absent sensory nerve action potential tend to have more severe nerve damage than those without. Thus, it is speculated that such patients generally have a poor prognosis. How absent sensory nerve action potential affects surgical outcomes remains uncertain owing to a scarcity of reports and conflicting results. This retrospective study recruited one hundred and fourteen cases(88 patients with absent sensory nerve action potential and 26 patients with present sensory nerve action potential) undergoing either subcutaneous transposition or in situ decompression. The minimum follow-up was set at 2 years. Primary outcome measures of overall hand function included their McGowan grade, modified Bishop score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire(DASH) score. For patients with absent sensory nerve action potential, 71 cases(80.7%) achieved at least one McGowan grade improvement, 76 hands(86.4%) got good or excellent results according to the Bishop score, and the average DASH score improved 49.5 points preoperatively to 13.1 points postoperatively. When compared with the present sensory nerve action potential group, they showed higher postoperative McGowan grades and DASH scores, but there was no statistical difference between the modified Bishop scores of the two groups. Following in situ decompression or subcutaneous transposition, great improvement in hand function was achieved for severe cubital tunnel syndrome patients with absent sensory nerve action potential. The functional outcomes after surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome are worse in patients with absent sensory nerve action potential than those without. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China(approval No. 2017142).展开更多
文摘目的:观察颈椎前路椎体骨化物复合体可控前移(anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion,ACAF)技术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament,OPLL)的脊髓原位减压效果。方法:回顾分析2017年6月~2018年12月我院收治的78例OPLL患者的人口学信息、影像资料以及术后指标(年龄、性别、症状持续时间、椎管侵占率和骨化累及椎体数量)。其中采用ACAF治疗42例,单开门椎管扩大椎板成形术(简称单开门椎板成形术open-door laminoplasty,LAM)治疗36例,平均随访时间21.7±4.0(12~30)个月。比较两组患者术前及末次随访时的JOA评分、脊髓面积、Cobb角、Kang′s分级以及C5神经麻痹、脑脊液漏、吞咽困难等并发症情况。结果:末次随访时,ACAF组与LAM组相比,在JOA评分(14.17±0.81分vs 13.81±1.12分,P<0.05)、脊髓面积(74.12±4.48mm^2 vs 70.36±5.60mm^2,P<0.05)、Cobb角(20.07°±1.28°vs 9.99°±0.65°,P<0.05)和Kang′s分级(0.93±1.40 vs 2.00±0.89,P<0.05)方面具有优势。对比ACAF组与LAM组的术后并发症,两组间C5神经麻痹(4.8%vs 11.1%)、脑脊液漏(2.4%vs 2.8%)、吞咽困难(9.5%vs 0%)无统计学差异。ACAF组2例出现C5神经麻痹的患者未能顺利完成原位减压。结论:ACAF手术可通过恢复椎管容积和形态实现脊髓原位减压,减压效果良好。在恢复颈椎曲度和脊髓位置形态方面,ACAF较LAM为优。
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81371374(to ZD)
文摘For severe cubital tunnel syndrome, patients with absent sensory nerve action potential tend to have more severe nerve damage than those without. Thus, it is speculated that such patients generally have a poor prognosis. How absent sensory nerve action potential affects surgical outcomes remains uncertain owing to a scarcity of reports and conflicting results. This retrospective study recruited one hundred and fourteen cases(88 patients with absent sensory nerve action potential and 26 patients with present sensory nerve action potential) undergoing either subcutaneous transposition or in situ decompression. The minimum follow-up was set at 2 years. Primary outcome measures of overall hand function included their McGowan grade, modified Bishop score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire(DASH) score. For patients with absent sensory nerve action potential, 71 cases(80.7%) achieved at least one McGowan grade improvement, 76 hands(86.4%) got good or excellent results according to the Bishop score, and the average DASH score improved 49.5 points preoperatively to 13.1 points postoperatively. When compared with the present sensory nerve action potential group, they showed higher postoperative McGowan grades and DASH scores, but there was no statistical difference between the modified Bishop scores of the two groups. Following in situ decompression or subcutaneous transposition, great improvement in hand function was achieved for severe cubital tunnel syndrome patients with absent sensory nerve action potential. The functional outcomes after surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome are worse in patients with absent sensory nerve action potential than those without. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, China(approval No. 2017142).
