期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Outcome of application of primary versus secondary Illizarov's fixator in open tibial shaft fractures 被引量:1
1
作者 Anil Joshi Saurabh Singh +3 位作者 Sudeep Jain Narender Rohilla Vivek Trikha Chandra Yadav 《World Journal of Emergency Medicine》 CAS 2016年第3期221-226,共6页
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov's fi xator application as a treatment method for type III open tibial fractures in terms of nonunion and wound infection.ME... BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov's fi xator application as a treatment method for type III open tibial fractures in terms of nonunion and wound infection.METHODS: This prospective study was done in a tertiary care center. Forty-eight type III tibial fractures were treated with Illizarov's apparatus between 2008 and 2011. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment protocol, timing of wound closure and Illizarov's application, primary(n=28) and secondary(n=20).RESULTS: In the primary group, healing was achieved in all 28 patients. The median time to recovery was 24 weeks, and the median number of operations was 3. There were 6 patients with a bone defect. In the secondary group, complete recovery was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients. The median time to recovery was 30 weeks, and the median number of operations 5. There were 9 patients with a bone defect. The median time to recovery and the number of operations were signifi cantly smaller in patients undergoing primary operation. Union was 100% in the primary group and more than 95% in the secondary group. Chronic osteomyelitis persisted in one patient and below amputation was done in one patient in the secondary group.CONCLUSION: Primary wound closure and Illizarov's fixation required a smaller number of operations and shorter time to recovery than secondary wound closure and Illizarov's fi xation, mostly due to a signifi cantly less number of patients with a bone defect in the primary group. 展开更多
关键词 Open fractures Limb salvage DEBRIDEMENT illizarov’s fi xator Tibial fractures
下载PDF
Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD技术治疗Gustilo Ⅱ、Ⅲ型开放性跟骨骨折 被引量:12
2
作者 姬广伟 马磊 +1 位作者 滕学仁 戴世友 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第20期1840-1844,共5页
[目的]研究Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD技术治疗开放性GustiloⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析自2010年6月~2017年5月共36例采用Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD治疗开放性跟骨骨折患者,男33例,女3例;年龄28~45岁,平均(40.13±... [目的]研究Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD技术治疗开放性GustiloⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析自2010年6月~2017年5月共36例采用Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD治疗开放性跟骨骨折患者,男33例,女3例;年龄28~45岁,平均(40.13±3.94)岁;根据开放性损伤Gustilo分型:GustiloⅡ型15例,ⅢA型14例,ⅢB型7例;根据Sanders骨折分型:Ⅱ型12例,Ⅲ型16例,Ⅳ型8例。予以开放性跟骨伤口清创,并经过伤口复位跟骨后,于胫骨下端安装Ilizarov支架全环,VSD贴敷伤口,必要时行伤口自体表皮皮肤移植。采用AOFAS评分和影像测量评价临床结果。[结果] 36例患者均顺利进行手术。其中19例患者皮肤切口及针道切口轻度红肿,经换药后伤口愈合。17例伤口因创面较大待创口肉芽组织充填后进行自体表皮皮肤移植,移植皮肤都得到存活。患者住院期间VSD负压引流时间15~35 d,平均更换(3.28±0.88)次。随访时间为6~24个月,平均(12.58±3.67)个月。AOFAS评分由术后3个月时(72.75±7.72)分,显著增加至末次随访时(79. 19±9.06)分。末次随访时临床结果评定为优10例,良18例,一般7例,差1例,优良率为77.78%。与术前相比较,术后3 d、术后6个月时跟骨影像测量参数,包括跟骨长度、宽度、B?hler角和Gissane角均显著改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术后3 d、6个月之间比较上述参数的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论] Ilizarov外固定架联合VSD技术治疗GustiloⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折具有良好的疗效。 展开更多
关键词 ILIZAROV外固定架 VSD技术 开放性跟骨骨折
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部