Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Pati...Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological,pulmonary,cardiovascular,and hematological assessments.Neuraxial blocks include spinal,epidural,and combined spinal epidural.Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene,supraclavicular,infraclavicular,and axillary.Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block,saphenous nerve block,sciatic nerve block,iPACK block,ankle block and lumbar plexus block.The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon,the anesthesiologist,and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment.The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation,patient positing,operative structures,operative manipulation,tourniquet use and the impact of postoperative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy.Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity(LAST),nerve injury,falls,hematoma,infection and allergic reactions.Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications.LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications(intralipid)should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.展开更多
目的分析超声引导下腘动脉与膝关节囊后间隙(infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)联合收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)在膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的慢性痛及膝关节手术...目的分析超声引导下腘动脉与膝关节囊后间隙(infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)联合收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)在膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的慢性痛及膝关节手术后镇痛中的应用效果。方法选取南京市六合区中医院于2021年7月—2022年9月收治的60例KOA患者作为研究对象,根据不同治疗方法将其分为对照组(n=30)与观察组(n=30)。对照组行超声引导下股神经阻滞(femoral nerve block,FNB),观察组行超声引导下IPACK联合ACB。以两组术后镇痛效果、膝关节活动度以及术后并发症等指标为对比项目。结果术后两组患者静态VAS评分与动态VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后各个时间点膝关节活动度改善情况均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率6.66%低于对照组的30.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.455,P<0.05)。结论超声引导下IPACK联合ACB麻醉,可减轻KOA患者术后疼痛程度,改善膝关节活动度,降低术后并发症。展开更多
[目的]探讨收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙(interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)阻滞在全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)的镇痛效果。[方法]2020年...[目的]探讨收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙(interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)阻滞在全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)的镇痛效果。[方法]2020年2月—2022年6月84例终末期膝骨性关节炎患者在静脉全麻下进行初次单侧TKA术,依据术前医患沟通结果,42例采用ACB、PACK联合I阻滞(联合组),另外42例采用单纯ACB阻滞(ACB组),比较两组围手术期临床与镇痛相关资料。[结果]两组手术时间、总不良反应、术中失血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合组术后恢复下地行走显著早于ACB组[(18.5±4.3)h vs(30.4±6.7)h,P<0.001],联合组术后8 h[(69.3±7.3)°vs(64.8±6.9)°,P=0.005]、术后24 h[(70.1±6.3)°vs(65.2±6.7)°,P=0.001]膝ROM显著大于ACB组。术后2~24 h两组的VAS评分均有所上升,但联合组术后各时间点均显著低于ACB组(P<0.05),联合组首次补救镇痛时间[(6.3±1.8)h vs(10.4±2.3)h,P<0.001]、镇痛泵按压次数[(3.0±0.5)次vs(5.7±0.7)次,P<0.001]、使用血管活性药物次数[(1.0±0.2)次vs(1.7±0.4)次,P<0.001]、额外镇痛药使用次数[(1.4±0.4)次vs(1.9±0.6)次,P<0.001]均显著低于ACB组。[结论]ACB联合IPACK阻滞能够降低TKA术后疼痛症状,提升膝关节活动度,缩短恢复下床时间。展开更多
目的探讨超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛的临床效果。方法选取该院2018年2月至2019年12月该院收治的行膝关节置换术患者90例,随机分为对照组(45例)和观察组(45例),分别采用超声引导下收肌管阻滞和超声引导下...目的探讨超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛的临床效果。方法选取该院2018年2月至2019年12月该院收治的行膝关节置换术患者90例,随机分为对照组(45例)和观察组(45例),分别采用超声引导下收肌管阻滞和超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞方案行术后镇痛。比较两组术后48 h疼痛数字评分法11(NRS)静态/动态评分曲线下面积(AUC)、麻醉药物使用情况[舒芬太尼使用量、静脉自控镇痛泵(PCIA)按压率]、下床最多活动步数及主动屈膝最大角度。结果观察组术后48 h NRS静态/动态评分AUC均显著低于对照组;舒芬太尼用量显著少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组PCIA按压率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后48 h下床最多活动步数和主动屈膝最大角度均显著多于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛可有效缓解患者术后疼痛程度,减少麻醉药物用量,并有助于改善患者早期活动功能。展开更多
文摘Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery.Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia.Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological,pulmonary,cardiovascular,and hematological assessments.Neuraxial blocks include spinal,epidural,and combined spinal epidural.Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene,supraclavicular,infraclavicular,and axillary.Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block,saphenous nerve block,sciatic nerve block,iPACK block,ankle block and lumbar plexus block.The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon,the anesthesiologist,and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment.The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation,patient positing,operative structures,operative manipulation,tourniquet use and the impact of postoperative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy.Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity(LAST),nerve injury,falls,hematoma,infection and allergic reactions.Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications.LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications(intralipid)should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.
文摘目的分析超声引导下腘动脉与膝关节囊后间隙(infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)联合收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)在膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的慢性痛及膝关节手术后镇痛中的应用效果。方法选取南京市六合区中医院于2021年7月—2022年9月收治的60例KOA患者作为研究对象,根据不同治疗方法将其分为对照组(n=30)与观察组(n=30)。对照组行超声引导下股神经阻滞(femoral nerve block,FNB),观察组行超声引导下IPACK联合ACB。以两组术后镇痛效果、膝关节活动度以及术后并发症等指标为对比项目。结果术后两组患者静态VAS评分与动态VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后各个时间点膝关节活动度改善情况均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率6.66%低于对照组的30.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.455,P<0.05)。结论超声引导下IPACK联合ACB麻醉,可减轻KOA患者术后疼痛程度,改善膝关节活动度,降低术后并发症。
文摘[目的]探讨收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙(interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee,IPACK)阻滞在全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)的镇痛效果。[方法]2020年2月—2022年6月84例终末期膝骨性关节炎患者在静脉全麻下进行初次单侧TKA术,依据术前医患沟通结果,42例采用ACB、PACK联合I阻滞(联合组),另外42例采用单纯ACB阻滞(ACB组),比较两组围手术期临床与镇痛相关资料。[结果]两组手术时间、总不良反应、术中失血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),联合组术后恢复下地行走显著早于ACB组[(18.5±4.3)h vs(30.4±6.7)h,P<0.001],联合组术后8 h[(69.3±7.3)°vs(64.8±6.9)°,P=0.005]、术后24 h[(70.1±6.3)°vs(65.2±6.7)°,P=0.001]膝ROM显著大于ACB组。术后2~24 h两组的VAS评分均有所上升,但联合组术后各时间点均显著低于ACB组(P<0.05),联合组首次补救镇痛时间[(6.3±1.8)h vs(10.4±2.3)h,P<0.001]、镇痛泵按压次数[(3.0±0.5)次vs(5.7±0.7)次,P<0.001]、使用血管活性药物次数[(1.0±0.2)次vs(1.7±0.4)次,P<0.001]、额外镇痛药使用次数[(1.4±0.4)次vs(1.9±0.6)次,P<0.001]均显著低于ACB组。[结论]ACB联合IPACK阻滞能够降低TKA术后疼痛症状,提升膝关节活动度,缩短恢复下床时间。
文摘目的探讨超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛的临床效果。方法选取该院2018年2月至2019年12月该院收治的行膝关节置换术患者90例,随机分为对照组(45例)和观察组(45例),分别采用超声引导下收肌管阻滞和超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞方案行术后镇痛。比较两组术后48 h疼痛数字评分法11(NRS)静态/动态评分曲线下面积(AUC)、麻醉药物使用情况[舒芬太尼使用量、静脉自控镇痛泵(PCIA)按压率]、下床最多活动步数及主动屈膝最大角度。结果观察组术后48 h NRS静态/动态评分AUC均显著低于对照组;舒芬太尼用量显著少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组PCIA按压率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后48 h下床最多活动步数和主动屈膝最大角度均显著多于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下收肌管联合ipAck神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术后镇痛可有效缓解患者术后疼痛程度,减少麻醉药物用量,并有助于改善患者早期活动功能。
