Sorafenib is used worldwide as a first-line standardsystemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) on the basis of the results of two large-scale Phase Ⅲ trials. Conversely,hepatic arterial infusion chemot...Sorafenib is used worldwide as a first-line standardsystemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) on the basis of the results of two large-scale Phase Ⅲ trials. Conversely,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) is one of the most recommended treatments in Japan. Although there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing sorafenib with HAIC,several retrospective analyses have shown no significant differences in survival between the two therapies. Outcomes are favorable for HCC patients exhibiting macroscopic vascular invasion when treated with HAIC rather than sorafenib,whereas in HCC patients exhibiting extrahepatic spread or resistance to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,good outcomes are achieved by treatment with sorafenib rather than HAIC. Additionally,sorafenib is generally used to treat patients with Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is indicated for those with either Child-Pugh A or B. Based on these findings,we reviewed treatment strategies for advanced HCC. We propose that sorafenib might be used as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC patients without macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is recommended for those with macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A or B. Additional research is required to determine the best second-line treatment for HAIC non-responders with Child-Pugh B through future clinical trials.展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:This was a re...Objective:To compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:This was a retrospective,single-center trial.Between April 3,2017 and July 2,2018,104 patients with Child-Pugh A and advanced HCC received either 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily plus HAIC with oxaliplatin(oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2,every 3 weeks via repetitive catheterization)(n=46,soraOXA group)or 400 mg of only sorafenib orally twice daily(n=58,sorafenib group).Overall survival,progression-free survival,objective response rate,and treatment-related adverse events were compared.Results:The median overall survival was 9.37 months(95%CI,7.05-11.68)in the soraOXA group versus 4.8 months(95%CI,2.98-6.62)in the sorafenib group(HR 0.46[95%CI,0.29-0.72];P<0.001).The soraOXA group also showed a higher objective response rate(16[34.8%]vs 1[1.7%];P<0.001)and a longer progressionfree survival rate(5.5 months[95%CI,2.32-8.68]vs 2.4 months[95%CI,1.65-3.15],HR 0.54[95%CI,0.36-0.81],P=0.003)than the sorafenib group.There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of any grade adverse events,grade 3/4 adverse events,serious adverse events,or incidence of treatment termination due to adverse events between the two groups.Conclusion:Compared with sorafenib alone,sorafenib plus HAIC with oxaliplatin showed favorable treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.The merits of this approach need to be established with a prospective trial.展开更多
基金Supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,KIBAN-B,No.16H05287
文摘Sorafenib is used worldwide as a first-line standardsystemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) on the basis of the results of two large-scale Phase Ⅲ trials. Conversely,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) is one of the most recommended treatments in Japan. Although there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing sorafenib with HAIC,several retrospective analyses have shown no significant differences in survival between the two therapies. Outcomes are favorable for HCC patients exhibiting macroscopic vascular invasion when treated with HAIC rather than sorafenib,whereas in HCC patients exhibiting extrahepatic spread or resistance to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,good outcomes are achieved by treatment with sorafenib rather than HAIC. Additionally,sorafenib is generally used to treat patients with Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is indicated for those with either Child-Pugh A or B. Based on these findings,we reviewed treatment strategies for advanced HCC. We propose that sorafenib might be used as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC patients without macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is recommended for those with macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A or B. Additional research is required to determine the best second-line treatment for HAIC non-responders with Child-Pugh B through future clinical trials.
基金supported by National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFA0505803)National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81625017,No.81572385)National Science and Technology Major Project of China(2018ZX10302205).
文摘Objective:To compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:This was a retrospective,single-center trial.Between April 3,2017 and July 2,2018,104 patients with Child-Pugh A and advanced HCC received either 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily plus HAIC with oxaliplatin(oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2,every 3 weeks via repetitive catheterization)(n=46,soraOXA group)or 400 mg of only sorafenib orally twice daily(n=58,sorafenib group).Overall survival,progression-free survival,objective response rate,and treatment-related adverse events were compared.Results:The median overall survival was 9.37 months(95%CI,7.05-11.68)in the soraOXA group versus 4.8 months(95%CI,2.98-6.62)in the sorafenib group(HR 0.46[95%CI,0.29-0.72];P<0.001).The soraOXA group also showed a higher objective response rate(16[34.8%]vs 1[1.7%];P<0.001)and a longer progressionfree survival rate(5.5 months[95%CI,2.32-8.68]vs 2.4 months[95%CI,1.65-3.15],HR 0.54[95%CI,0.36-0.81],P=0.003)than the sorafenib group.There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of any grade adverse events,grade 3/4 adverse events,serious adverse events,or incidence of treatment termination due to adverse events between the two groups.Conclusion:Compared with sorafenib alone,sorafenib plus HAIC with oxaliplatin showed favorable treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.The merits of this approach need to be established with a prospective trial.
