目的心脏手术患者液体治疗策略历来存有争论。文中旨在观察目标导向血流动力学管理策略对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者预后的影响。方法选取安徽医科大学第一附属医院2016年1-12月择期行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的98例患者纳入研究...目的心脏手术患者液体治疗策略历来存有争论。文中旨在观察目标导向血流动力学管理策略对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者预后的影响。方法选取安徽医科大学第一附属医院2016年1-12月择期行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的98例患者纳入研究。以2016年6月20日进行质量改进为截点。质量改进前56例患者纳入对照组、质量改进后42例患者纳入试验组。质量改进措施为采用以每博量变异和心脏指数为目标导向液体治疗输注液体,标准化使用血管活性药物,优化血流动力学。通过电子病历系统采集术中和术后数据,比较两组患者的液体出入量、术后住院天数和并发症、术后苏醒时间、24小时胸腔引流量、6小时内拔管率、ICU驻留时间、术后第1天肌钙蛋白I水平、30天病死率以及半年病死率。结果采用目标导向血流动力学管理后,试验组较对照组液体总入量差异无统计学意义,其中万汶输注量显著增加[(676.79±380.90)mL vs(890.48±222.58)mL]、晶体输注量显著减少[(663.84±224.97)mL vs(430.24±201.76)mL]、尿量显著增加[(516.07±224.87)mL vs(695.24±311.53)mL],液体正平衡显著减少[(683.82±556.08)mL vs(456.43±505.36)mL],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);自体血回输、红细胞输注比例、出血量两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后苏醒时间、24小时胸腔引流量、6小时内拔管率、术后第1天肌钙蛋白I水平、ICU驻留时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组术后住院天数试验组较对照组显著减少(11.81 d vs 13.82 d,P<0.05)。对其对数转换后进行多元线性回归分析,得出质量改进措施的标准化系数B为-0.296(SE=0.061,P<0.05),说明其他条件相同时,采用目标导向血流动力学管理能减少术后住院天数19.4%(95%CI 7.3%～31.5%)。术后并发症从41.07%下降至16.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中采用目标导向血流展开更多
Hemodynamic monitoring and optimization improve postoperative outcome during high-risk surgery.However,hemodynamic management practices among Chinese anesthesiologists are largely unknown.This study sought to evaluate...Hemodynamic monitoring and optimization improve postoperative outcome during high-risk surgery.However,hemodynamic management practices among Chinese anesthesiologists are largely unknown.This study sought to evaluate the current intraoperative hemodynamic management practices for high-risk surgery patients in China.From September 2010 to November 2011,we surveyed anesthesiologists working in the operating rooms of 265 hospitals representing 28 Chinese provinces.All questionnaires were distributed to department chairs of anesthesiology or practicing anesthesiologists.Once completed,the 29-item questionnaires were collected and analyzed.Two hundred and 10 questionnaires from 265 hospitals in China were collected.We found that 91.4%of anesthesiologists monitored invasive arterial pressure,82.9%monitored central venous pressure（CVP）,13.3%monitored cardiac output（CO）,10.5%monitored mixed venous saturation,and less than 2%monitored pulse pressure variation（PPV） or systolic pressure variation（SPV） during high-risk surgery.The majority（88%） of anesthesiologists relied on clinical experience as an indicator for volume expansion and more than 80%relied on blood pressure,CVP and urine output.Anesthesiologists in China do not own enough attention on hemodynamic parameters such as PPV,SPV and CO during fluid management in high-risk surgical patients.The lack of CO monitoring may be attributed largely to the limited access to technologies,the cost of the devices and the lack of education on how to use them.There is a need for improving access to these technologies as well as an opportunity to create guidelines and education for hemodynamic optimization in China.展开更多
文摘目的心脏手术患者液体治疗策略历来存有争论。文中旨在观察目标导向血流动力学管理策略对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术患者预后的影响。方法选取安徽医科大学第一附属医院2016年1-12月择期行非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术的98例患者纳入研究。以2016年6月20日进行质量改进为截点。质量改进前56例患者纳入对照组、质量改进后42例患者纳入试验组。质量改进措施为采用以每博量变异和心脏指数为目标导向液体治疗输注液体,标准化使用血管活性药物,优化血流动力学。通过电子病历系统采集术中和术后数据,比较两组患者的液体出入量、术后住院天数和并发症、术后苏醒时间、24小时胸腔引流量、6小时内拔管率、ICU驻留时间、术后第1天肌钙蛋白I水平、30天病死率以及半年病死率。结果采用目标导向血流动力学管理后,试验组较对照组液体总入量差异无统计学意义,其中万汶输注量显著增加[(676.79±380.90)mL vs(890.48±222.58)mL]、晶体输注量显著减少[(663.84±224.97)mL vs(430.24±201.76)mL]、尿量显著增加[(516.07±224.87)mL vs(695.24±311.53)mL],液体正平衡显著减少[(683.82±556.08)mL vs(456.43±505.36)mL],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);自体血回输、红细胞输注比例、出血量两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后苏醒时间、24小时胸腔引流量、6小时内拔管率、术后第1天肌钙蛋白I水平、ICU驻留时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组术后住院天数试验组较对照组显著减少(11.81 d vs 13.82 d,P<0.05)。对其对数转换后进行多元线性回归分析,得出质量改进措施的标准化系数B为-0.296(SE=0.061,P<0.05),说明其他条件相同时,采用目标导向血流动力学管理能减少术后住院天数19.4%(95%CI 7.3%～31.5%)。术后并发症从41.07%下降至16.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中采用目标导向血流
文摘Hemodynamic monitoring and optimization improve postoperative outcome during high-risk surgery.However,hemodynamic management practices among Chinese anesthesiologists are largely unknown.This study sought to evaluate the current intraoperative hemodynamic management practices for high-risk surgery patients in China.From September 2010 to November 2011,we surveyed anesthesiologists working in the operating rooms of 265 hospitals representing 28 Chinese provinces.All questionnaires were distributed to department chairs of anesthesiology or practicing anesthesiologists.Once completed,the 29-item questionnaires were collected and analyzed.Two hundred and 10 questionnaires from 265 hospitals in China were collected.We found that 91.4%of anesthesiologists monitored invasive arterial pressure,82.9%monitored central venous pressure（CVP）,13.3%monitored cardiac output（CO）,10.5%monitored mixed venous saturation,and less than 2%monitored pulse pressure variation（PPV） or systolic pressure variation（SPV） during high-risk surgery.The majority（88%） of anesthesiologists relied on clinical experience as an indicator for volume expansion and more than 80%relied on blood pressure,CVP and urine output.Anesthesiologists in China do not own enough attention on hemodynamic parameters such as PPV,SPV and CO during fluid management in high-risk surgical patients.The lack of CO monitoring may be attributed largely to the limited access to technologies,the cost of the devices and the lack of education on how to use them.There is a need for improving access to these technologies as well as an opportunity to create guidelines and education for hemodynamic optimization in China.
