Bipolar disorder presents significant challenges in clinical management, characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and mania often accompanied by impairment in functioning. This study investigates the efficacy...Bipolar disorder presents significant challenges in clinical management, characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and mania often accompanied by impairment in functioning. This study investigates the efficacy of pharmacological interventions and rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. Utilizing a randomized controlled trial with multiple treatment arms, participants will receive pharmacotherapy, polypharmacotherapy, rehabilitation interventions, or combination treatments. Outcome measures will be assessed using standardized scales, including the Hamilton Depression Scale, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and Mania Scale. Preliminary data suggest improvements in symptom severity and functional outcomes with combination treatments. This research aims to inform clinical practice, guide treatment decisions, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for individuals living with bipolar disorder. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences to advance knowledge in this field.展开更多
目的:目前针对抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)中普遍使用汉密尔顿量表(HAMD)评价抑郁程度。本研究旨在调查该评分细节报告的完整性,尤其是研究者对研究结果解释中临床意义的重视程度。方法:检索2020年10月至2022年10月发表于国家知识基础设...目的:目前针对抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)中普遍使用汉密尔顿量表(HAMD)评价抑郁程度。本研究旨在调查该评分细节报告的完整性,尤其是研究者对研究结果解释中临床意义的重视程度。方法:检索2020年10月至2022年10月发表于国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)、中国学术期刊数据库(CSPD)、中文科技期刊数据库(CCD)、临床试验注册系统(ChiCTR)、PUBMED、Cochrane、EMBASE、Web of Science、PROQUEST共9个数据库的以“针刺治疗抑郁症”为主题并报告HAMD结果的RCT。2名研究者独立提取了各研究对HAMD评分的报告细节以及对结果临床意义的报告和解释。结果:共检索到符合标准的RCT91项,超过95%的文献报道了均值、标准差及P值,但仅有3.3%的文献报道95%置信区间。93.4%的文献直接或间接地报道了HAMD值所代表的意义,73.6%报道了HAMD量表类型,19.8%文献报道HAMD的总分,34.1%的文献报道了HAMD具体的评价方法。统计学意义的报道在75%以上,纳入文献均报道了临床意义,但临床意义的解读仅基于统计学意义,并未结合临床实际有效值来判定。组间比较结果显示,学位论文各项报道的百分比均高于普通文献。国外研究报道的完整性普遍高于国内文献。结论:针刺治疗抑郁症随机对照试验的中文文献HAMD评分报道尚且不够完整。建议研究者在试验报告中参考高质量RCT结果,更详细地描述评分类指标的细节、合理解读其临床意义,以提高结局指标报道的质量。展开更多
文摘Bipolar disorder presents significant challenges in clinical management, characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and mania often accompanied by impairment in functioning. This study investigates the efficacy of pharmacological interventions and rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. Utilizing a randomized controlled trial with multiple treatment arms, participants will receive pharmacotherapy, polypharmacotherapy, rehabilitation interventions, or combination treatments. Outcome measures will be assessed using standardized scales, including the Hamilton Depression Scale, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and Mania Scale. Preliminary data suggest improvements in symptom severity and functional outcomes with combination treatments. This research aims to inform clinical practice, guide treatment decisions, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for individuals living with bipolar disorder. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences to advance knowledge in this field.
文摘目的:目前针对抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)中普遍使用汉密尔顿量表(HAMD)评价抑郁程度。本研究旨在调查该评分细节报告的完整性,尤其是研究者对研究结果解释中临床意义的重视程度。方法:检索2020年10月至2022年10月发表于国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)、中国学术期刊数据库(CSPD)、中文科技期刊数据库(CCD)、临床试验注册系统(ChiCTR)、PUBMED、Cochrane、EMBASE、Web of Science、PROQUEST共9个数据库的以“针刺治疗抑郁症”为主题并报告HAMD结果的RCT。2名研究者独立提取了各研究对HAMD评分的报告细节以及对结果临床意义的报告和解释。结果:共检索到符合标准的RCT91项,超过95%的文献报道了均值、标准差及P值,但仅有3.3%的文献报道95%置信区间。93.4%的文献直接或间接地报道了HAMD值所代表的意义,73.6%报道了HAMD量表类型,19.8%文献报道HAMD的总分,34.1%的文献报道了HAMD具体的评价方法。统计学意义的报道在75%以上,纳入文献均报道了临床意义,但临床意义的解读仅基于统计学意义,并未结合临床实际有效值来判定。组间比较结果显示,学位论文各项报道的百分比均高于普通文献。国外研究报道的完整性普遍高于国内文献。结论:针刺治疗抑郁症随机对照试验的中文文献HAMD评分报道尚且不够完整。建议研究者在试验报告中参考高质量RCT结果,更详细地描述评分类指标的细节、合理解读其临床意义,以提高结局指标报道的质量。
