The increase in gravitational wave(GW) events has allowed receiving strong lensing image pairs of GWs. However, the wave effect(diffraction and interference) due to the microlens field contaminates the parameter estim...The increase in gravitational wave(GW) events has allowed receiving strong lensing image pairs of GWs. However, the wave effect(diffraction and interference) due to the microlens field contaminates the parameter estimation of the image pair, which may lead to a misjudgment of strong lensing signals. To quantify the influence of the microlens field, researchers need a large sample of statistical research. Nevertheless, due to the oscillation characteristic, the Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction integral’s computational time hinders this aspect’s study. Although many algorithms are available, most cannot be well applied to the case where the microlens field is embedded in galaxy/galaxy clusters. This work proposes a faster and more accurate algorithm for studying the wave optics effect of microlenses embedded in different types of strong lensing images. Additionally, we provide a quantitative estimation criterion for the lens plane boundary for the Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction integral. This algorithm can significantly facilitate the study of wave optics, particularly in the case of microlens fields embedded in galaxy/galaxy clusters.展开更多
Formulas of diffraction field of lossy wedges with less than 180?wedge angle are derived on the basis of the Fresnel-Kirchhoff wave theory and their numerical results are compared with those of the heuristic lossy wed...Formulas of diffraction field of lossy wedges with less than 180?wedge angle are derived on the basis of the Fresnel-Kirchhoff wave theory and their numerical results are compared with those of the heuristic lossy wedge diffraction coefficient given by Luebbers (1984), showing good agreement between the two types of numerical results which have different bases in theory. The agreement shows that the lossy wedge diffraction coefficient as an extension of UTD is quite reasonable.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.U1931210,11673065,and 11273061)the Science Research Grants from the China Manned Space Project(Grant No.CMSCSST-2021-A11)+5 种基金the Sugon Advanced Computing Service Platform for Computing Supportthe Cosmology Simulation Database(CSD)in the National Basic Science Data Center(NBSDC)its funds the NBSDC-DB-10(Grant No.2020000088)supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(Grant No.2021YFC2203100)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.11903030,and 11903033)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Grant Nos.WK2030000036,and WK3440000004)。
文摘The increase in gravitational wave(GW) events has allowed receiving strong lensing image pairs of GWs. However, the wave effect(diffraction and interference) due to the microlens field contaminates the parameter estimation of the image pair, which may lead to a misjudgment of strong lensing signals. To quantify the influence of the microlens field, researchers need a large sample of statistical research. Nevertheless, due to the oscillation characteristic, the Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction integral’s computational time hinders this aspect’s study. Although many algorithms are available, most cannot be well applied to the case where the microlens field is embedded in galaxy/galaxy clusters. This work proposes a faster and more accurate algorithm for studying the wave optics effect of microlenses embedded in different types of strong lensing images. Additionally, we provide a quantitative estimation criterion for the lens plane boundary for the Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction integral. This algorithm can significantly facilitate the study of wave optics, particularly in the case of microlens fields embedded in galaxy/galaxy clusters.
文摘Formulas of diffraction field of lossy wedges with less than 180?wedge angle are derived on the basis of the Fresnel-Kirchhoff wave theory and their numerical results are compared with those of the heuristic lossy wedge diffraction coefficient given by Luebbers (1984), showing good agreement between the two types of numerical results which have different bases in theory. The agreement shows that the lossy wedge diffraction coefficient as an extension of UTD is quite reasonable.
