论文分析了美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)于2015年2月正式发布的《高等教育信息素养框架》(Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education),在此基础上,对Web2.0与E-Science环境下的信息素养教育内容进行思考,认为新信息...论文分析了美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)于2015年2月正式发布的《高等教育信息素养框架》(Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education),在此基础上,对Web2.0与E-Science环境下的信息素养教育内容进行思考,认为新信息环境下信息素养教育应突破文献信息的获取、评价、利用这一线性过程,认识到信息生态环境与学术环境的多维度与多元化,强调学习者参与信息环境与学术环境会话,具备信息交互能力与相应的道德。展开更多
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to develop a standardized and reliable measurement tool for assessing information-seeking behavior of undergraduate students.Design/methodology/approach: Based on information literacy...Purpose: The aim of this paper is to develop a standardized and reliable measurement tool for assessing information-seeking behavior of undergraduate students.Design/methodology/approach: Based on information literacy and information-seeking behavior theories, expert advice and students' interview, items of undergraduates' informationseeking behavior indicators were selected. With the analysis of homogeneity reliability, item analysis and factor analysis, this study constructs an assessment system to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale.Findings: The information-seeking behavior scale for undergraduates has divided undergraduates' information-seeking behavior into seven dimensions, which include 46 items. The reliability analysis of Cronbach's α was 0.910, and the coefficient of split-half reliability was0.817. The results of factor analysis showed that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO) was 0.864,which indicates 55.536% of the total variation could be explained by the above seven dimensions.Research limitations: Due to a small sample size and limited sample distribution, further research need be conducted in an expanded sample size in order to explore the application scope of this evaluation system; in addition, the stability of the scale also need be confirmed.Practical implications: The paper sets up an information-seeking behavior evaluation system for undergraduates and explores the characteristics of their information-seeking behavior.This study provides guidance for the development of future information literacy education and the improvement of the information literacy level of undergraduates.Originality/value: An information-seeking behavior scale for undergraduates has been developed, which comprehensively covers information need, information source, information evaluation, information retrieval, information management, information utilization and information morality. The scale is proved to have good reliability, validity, popularity anddiscrimination that it is qualified to be an assessment tool of inf展开更多
文摘论文分析了美国大学与研究图书馆协会(ACRL)于2015年2月正式发布的《高等教育信息素养框架》(Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education),在此基础上,对Web2.0与E-Science环境下的信息素养教育内容进行思考,认为新信息环境下信息素养教育应突破文献信息的获取、评价、利用这一线性过程,认识到信息生态环境与学术环境的多维度与多元化,强调学习者参与信息环境与学术环境会话,具备信息交互能力与相应的道德。
基金supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China(Grant No.:11BTQ044)the Innovative Training Program for College Students in Changsha University(Grant No:CW11255)
文摘Purpose: The aim of this paper is to develop a standardized and reliable measurement tool for assessing information-seeking behavior of undergraduate students.Design/methodology/approach: Based on information literacy and information-seeking behavior theories, expert advice and students' interview, items of undergraduates' informationseeking behavior indicators were selected. With the analysis of homogeneity reliability, item analysis and factor analysis, this study constructs an assessment system to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale.Findings: The information-seeking behavior scale for undergraduates has divided undergraduates' information-seeking behavior into seven dimensions, which include 46 items. The reliability analysis of Cronbach's α was 0.910, and the coefficient of split-half reliability was0.817. The results of factor analysis showed that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO) was 0.864,which indicates 55.536% of the total variation could be explained by the above seven dimensions.Research limitations: Due to a small sample size and limited sample distribution, further research need be conducted in an expanded sample size in order to explore the application scope of this evaluation system; in addition, the stability of the scale also need be confirmed.Practical implications: The paper sets up an information-seeking behavior evaluation system for undergraduates and explores the characteristics of their information-seeking behavior.This study provides guidance for the development of future information literacy education and the improvement of the information literacy level of undergraduates.Originality/value: An information-seeking behavior scale for undergraduates has been developed, which comprehensively covers information need, information source, information evaluation, information retrieval, information management, information utilization and information morality. The scale is proved to have good reliability, validity, popularity anddiscrimination that it is qualified to be an assessment tool of inf
