Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthrac...Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline?containing regimens.However,no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first?line capecitabine?based combination chemotherapy(FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor(HR)?positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)?negative breast cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients who were in non?progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,in Beijing,China.The median number of first?line chemotherapy cycles was 6(range,4–8);combined agents included taxanes,vinorelbine,or gemcitabine.Of these 138 patients,79 received MCT,and 59 received HT.Single?agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days,followed by a 7?day rest period,repeated every 3 weeks.Of the 59 patients who received HT,37 received aromatase inhibitors(AIs),8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs),and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs.We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy.Results:With a median follow?up of 43 months,patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group(13 vs.8 months,P ease?free surviv= 0.011).When TTP was adjusted for age,menopausal status,Karnofsky performance status score,disal,site of metastasis,number of metastatic sites,and response status after FCCT,extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group(hazard ratio:0.63;95% confidence interval:0.44–0.93;P = 0.020).We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs.patients in the MCT group,but the difference was not significant(43 vs.37 months,P tients in the MCT g= 0.400).In add展开更多
Background:Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer(mTNBC)is an aggressive histological subtype with poor prognosis.Several first-line treatments are currently available for mTNBC.This study conducted a network meta-a...Background:Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer(mTNBC)is an aggressive histological subtype with poor prognosis.Several first-line treatments are currently available for mTNBC.This study conducted a network meta-analysis to compare these first-line regimens and to determine the regimen with the best efficacy.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed,EMBASE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases,and mi-nutes of major conferences was performed.Progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and objective response rate(ORR)were analyzed via network meta-analysis using the R software(R Core Team,Vienna,Austria).The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios and 95%confidence intervals.Results:A total of 29 randomized controlled trials involving 4607 patients were analyzed.The ranking was based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.Network meta-analysis results showed that cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine in terms of PFS and ORR.For programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1)and breast cancer susceptibility gene(BRCA)mutation-positive tumors,atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine.No significant difference was observed among the treatments in Os.Neutropenia,diarrhea,and fatigue were common serious adverse events.Conclusion:Cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel is the preferred first-line treatment for mTNBC.For PD-L1 and BRCA mutation-positive tumors,atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib is an effective treatment option,Neutropenia,diarrhea,and fatigue are frequently occurring serious adverseevents.展开更多
BACKGROUND Bevacizumab,an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)monoclonal antibody,inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth.Serum VEGF-C,lactate dehydrogenase,and inflammatory markers have been reported ...BACKGROUND Bevacizumab,an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)monoclonal antibody,inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth.Serum VEGF-C,lactate dehydrogenase,and inflammatory markers have been reported as predictive markers related to bevacizumab treatment.Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)could act upon VEGF receptor 2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis.AIM To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the expression of PD-L1.METHODS This analysis included CRC patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy between June 24,2014 and February 28,2022,at Samsung Medical Center(Seoul,South Korea).Analysis of patient data included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score(CPS).We analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab according to PD-L1 expression status in patients with CRC.RESULTS A total of 124 patients was included in this analysis.Almost all patients were treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line chemotherapy.While 77%of patients received FOLFOX,23%received FOLFIRI as backbone first-line chemotherapy.The numbers of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more,5 or more,or 10 or more were 105(85%),64(52%),and 32(26%),respectively.The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)with bevacizumab treatment between patients with PDL1 CPS less than 1 and those with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more(PD-L1<1%vs PD-L1≥1%;PFS:P=0.93,OS:P=0.33),between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 5 and of 5 or more(PD-L1<5%vs PD-L1≥5%;PFS:P=0.409,OS:P=0.746),and between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 10 and of 10 or more(PD-L1<10%vs PD-L1≥10%;PFS:P=0.529,OS:P=0.568).CONCLUSION Chemotherapy containing bevacizumab can be considered as first-line therapy in metastatic CRC irrespective of PD-L1 expression.展开更多
目的探讨品管圈活动(quality control circle,QCC)对提高首次化疗患者(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管接受率的效果。方法采用回顾性分析方法,选取2021年10月至2022年1月住院已出院的需行PICC置管首次化疗的158例已...目的探讨品管圈活动(quality control circle,QCC)对提高首次化疗患者(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管接受率的效果。方法采用回顾性分析方法,选取2021年10月至2022年1月住院已出院的需行PICC置管首次化疗的158例已出院患者作为对照组,采用常规护理流程进行PICC置管前护理;选择2022年2月至2022年6月需行PICC置管首次化疗的172例已出院患者作为观察组,置管前进行品管圈活动干预,比较两组患者的PICC置管接受率。结果对照组和观察组的置管接受率分别为36.71%和61.05%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论品管圈活动能有效提高首次化疗患者PICC置管接受率。展开更多
BACKGROUND The incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in China are the second-highest in the world,and most patients with gastric cancer lose their chance of surgery by the time of their diagnosis.AIM To expl...BACKGROUND The incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in China are the second-highest in the world,and most patients with gastric cancer lose their chance of surgery by the time of their diagnosis.AIM To explore the predictive potential of serum basic fibroblast growth factor and interleukin-1βlevels for the effect of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.METHODS From the gastric cancer patients admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to April 2023,84 patients were selected and randomly and equally assigned to the experimental or control group.The FLOT group received the FLOT chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+calcium folinate+fluorouracil+paclitaxel),while the SOX group received the SOX chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+tiga capsules).The clinical efficacy,tumor marker levels,adverse reactions,and survival rates of the two groups were compared 7 days after the end of the relevant treatments.RESULTS The target effective rate of the FLOT group was 54.76%,which was much higher than that of the SOX group(33.33%;P<0.05).After treatment,both the groups demonstrated lower levels of cancer antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199),and peptide tissue antigen(TPS).For several patients before treatment(P<0.05).Third and fourth grades.In terms of adverse reactions,the level of white blood cells in both the groups was lower.Moreover,the incidence of hand-foot skin reactions in these two study groups was lower(P<0.05),while those of peripheral neuritis,vomiting,diarrhea,and abnormal liver function were significant(P<0.05).No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups(P<0.05).The 1-year survival rate was higher in the FLOT group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The FLOT regimen was effective in reducing the serum CEA,CA199,and TPS levels as well as in improving the 1-year survival rate of patients with good tolerability,making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.展开更多
Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior...Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior in terms of overall survival(OS)and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity.Accordingly,S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC.This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1(GS)vs.GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC.Methods:Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated.Results:A total of 300 patients were assessed,of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP.The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP(50.0%vs.30.3%,P=0.0028).The objective response rate(ORR)was slightly higher(14.3%vs.9.7%,P=0.35),and the median OS was significantly longer(17.9 months vs.13.3 months,P=0.0078),in the GS group than the GnP group.However,the median progression-free survival(PFS)did not significantly differ between groups.Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group(14.9%vs.28.1%,P=0.049).Conclusions:As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC,the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen.The PFS,ORR,and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.展开更多
Colorectal cancer(CRC) is an emerging health problem in the Western World both for its raising tendency as well as for its metastatic potential. Almost half of the patients with CRC will develop liver metastases durin...Colorectal cancer(CRC) is an emerging health problem in the Western World both for its raising tendency as well as for its metastatic potential. Almost half of the patients with CRC will develop liver metastases during the course of their disease. The liver surgeon dealing with colorectal liver metastases faces several surgical dilemmas especially in the setting of the timing of operation. Synchronous resectable metastases should be treated prior or after induction chemotherapy? Furthermore in the case of synchronous colorectal liver metastases which organ should we first deal with, the liver or the colon? All these questions are set in the editorial and impulse for further investigation is put focusing on multidisciplinary approach and individualization of treatment modalities.展开更多
基金This work was sup-ported by National Natural Sclence Foundatlon of China(no.81202108)
文摘Background:Both hormonal therapy(HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy(MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression(TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer(MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline?containing regimens.However,no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first?line capecitabine?based combination chemotherapy(FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor(HR)?positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)?negative breast cancer.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR?positive and HER2?negative MBC patients who were in non?progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,in Beijing,China.The median number of first?line chemotherapy cycles was 6(range,4–8);combined agents included taxanes,vinorelbine,or gemcitabine.Of these 138 patients,79 received MCT,and 59 received HT.Single?agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days,followed by a 7?day rest period,repeated every 3 weeks.Of the 59 patients who received HT,37 received aromatase inhibitors(AIs),8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators(SERMs),and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs.We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy.Results:With a median follow?up of 43 months,patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group(13 vs.8 months,P ease?free surviv= 0.011).When TTP was adjusted for age,menopausal status,Karnofsky performance status score,disal,site of metastasis,number of metastatic sites,and response status after FCCT,extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group(hazard ratio:0.63;95% confidence interval:0.44–0.93;P = 0.020).We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs.patients in the MCT group,but the difference was not significant(43 vs.37 months,P tients in the MCT g= 0.400).In add
文摘Background:Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer(mTNBC)is an aggressive histological subtype with poor prognosis.Several first-line treatments are currently available for mTNBC.This study conducted a network meta-analysis to compare these first-line regimens and to determine the regimen with the best efficacy.Methods:A systematic search of PubMed,EMBASE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases,and mi-nutes of major conferences was performed.Progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and objective response rate(ORR)were analyzed via network meta-analysis using the R software(R Core Team,Vienna,Austria).The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios and 95%confidence intervals.Results:A total of 29 randomized controlled trials involving 4607 patients were analyzed.The ranking was based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.Network meta-analysis results showed that cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine in terms of PFS and ORR.For programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1)and breast cancer susceptibility gene(BRCA)mutation-positive tumors,atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib was superior to docetaxel plus capecitabine.No significant difference was observed among the treatments in Os.Neutropenia,diarrhea,and fatigue were common serious adverse events.Conclusion:Cisplatin combined with nab-paclitaxel or paclitaxel is the preferred first-line treatment for mTNBC.For PD-L1 and BRCA mutation-positive tumors,atezolizumab/pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and talazoparib is an effective treatment option,Neutropenia,diarrhea,and fatigue are frequently occurring serious adverseevents.
文摘BACKGROUND Bevacizumab,an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)monoclonal antibody,inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor growth.Serum VEGF-C,lactate dehydrogenase,and inflammatory markers have been reported as predictive markers related to bevacizumab treatment.Programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)could act upon VEGF receptor 2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis.AIM To investigate the efficacy of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the expression of PD-L1.METHODS This analysis included CRC patients who received bevacizumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy between June 24,2014 and February 28,2022,at Samsung Medical Center(Seoul,South Korea).Analysis of patient data included evaluation of PD-L1 expression by the combined positive score(CPS).We analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab according to PD-L1 expression status in patients with CRC.RESULTS A total of 124 patients was included in this analysis.Almost all patients were treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX as the first-line chemotherapy.While 77%of patients received FOLFOX,23%received FOLFIRI as backbone first-line chemotherapy.The numbers of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more,5 or more,or 10 or more were 105(85%),64(52%),and 32(26%),respectively.The results showed no significant difference in progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)with bevacizumab treatment between patients with PDL1 CPS less than 1 and those with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or more(PD-L1<1%vs PD-L1≥1%;PFS:P=0.93,OS:P=0.33),between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 5 and of 5 or more(PD-L1<5%vs PD-L1≥5%;PFS:P=0.409,OS:P=0.746),and between patients with PD-L1 CPS less than 10 and of 10 or more(PD-L1<10%vs PD-L1≥10%;PFS:P=0.529,OS:P=0.568).CONCLUSION Chemotherapy containing bevacizumab can be considered as first-line therapy in metastatic CRC irrespective of PD-L1 expression.
文摘目的探讨品管圈活动(quality control circle,QCC)对提高首次化疗患者(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管接受率的效果。方法采用回顾性分析方法,选取2021年10月至2022年1月住院已出院的需行PICC置管首次化疗的158例已出院患者作为对照组,采用常规护理流程进行PICC置管前护理;选择2022年2月至2022年6月需行PICC置管首次化疗的172例已出院患者作为观察组,置管前进行品管圈活动干预,比较两组患者的PICC置管接受率。结果对照组和观察组的置管接受率分别为36.71%和61.05%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论品管圈活动能有效提高首次化疗患者PICC置管接受率。
基金Jiangxi Province Major Discipline Academic and Technical Leaders Project,No.812178084229.
文摘BACKGROUND The incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in China are the second-highest in the world,and most patients with gastric cancer lose their chance of surgery by the time of their diagnosis.AIM To explore the predictive potential of serum basic fibroblast growth factor and interleukin-1βlevels for the effect of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.METHODS From the gastric cancer patients admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to April 2023,84 patients were selected and randomly and equally assigned to the experimental or control group.The FLOT group received the FLOT chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+calcium folinate+fluorouracil+paclitaxel),while the SOX group received the SOX chemotherapy regimen(composed of oxaliplatin+tiga capsules).The clinical efficacy,tumor marker levels,adverse reactions,and survival rates of the two groups were compared 7 days after the end of the relevant treatments.RESULTS The target effective rate of the FLOT group was 54.76%,which was much higher than that of the SOX group(33.33%;P<0.05).After treatment,both the groups demonstrated lower levels of cancer antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199),and peptide tissue antigen(TPS).For several patients before treatment(P<0.05).Third and fourth grades.In terms of adverse reactions,the level of white blood cells in both the groups was lower.Moreover,the incidence of hand-foot skin reactions in these two study groups was lower(P<0.05),while those of peripheral neuritis,vomiting,diarrhea,and abnormal liver function were significant(P<0.05).No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups(P<0.05).The 1-year survival rate was higher in the FLOT group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The FLOT regimen was effective in reducing the serum CEA,CA199,and TPS levels as well as in improving the 1-year survival rate of patients with good tolerability,making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.
基金supported by grants from National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding(Grant Nos.2022-PUMCH-D-001 and 2022-PUMCH-A-213)。
文摘Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior in terms of overall survival(OS)and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity.Accordingly,S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC.This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1(GS)vs.GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC.Methods:Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated.Results:A total of 300 patients were assessed,of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP.The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP(50.0%vs.30.3%,P=0.0028).The objective response rate(ORR)was slightly higher(14.3%vs.9.7%,P=0.35),and the median OS was significantly longer(17.9 months vs.13.3 months,P=0.0078),in the GS group than the GnP group.However,the median progression-free survival(PFS)did not significantly differ between groups.Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group(14.9%vs.28.1%,P=0.049).Conclusions:As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC,the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen.The PFS,ORR,and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.
文摘Colorectal cancer(CRC) is an emerging health problem in the Western World both for its raising tendency as well as for its metastatic potential. Almost half of the patients with CRC will develop liver metastases during the course of their disease. The liver surgeon dealing with colorectal liver metastases faces several surgical dilemmas especially in the setting of the timing of operation. Synchronous resectable metastases should be treated prior or after induction chemotherapy? Furthermore in the case of synchronous colorectal liver metastases which organ should we first deal with, the liver or the colon? All these questions are set in the editorial and impulse for further investigation is put focusing on multidisciplinary approach and individualization of treatment modalities.
