AIM： to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonographyguided fine needle aspiration （EUS-FNA） in the preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor （GIST）.METHODS： From September 2002 to June 2006, Fi...AIM： to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonographyguided fine needle aspiration （EUS-FNA） in the preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor （GIST）.METHODS： From September 2002 to June 2006, Fiftythree consecutive EUS-FNAs of GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumors with continuity to proper muscle layer suspected as GIST by standard EUS were evaluated prospectively. The reference standards for the final diagnosis were surgery （n = 31）, or clinical follow-up （n = 22）. Additionally, immunophenotyping of specimens obtained by EUS-FNA and surgical resection specimens were compared.RESULTS： In 2 cases puncture was not performed because of anatomical problems. The collection rate of adequate specimens from the GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumor with continuity to proper muscle layer was 82% （42/51）. The diagnostic rate for the tumor less than 2 cm, 2 to 4 cm, and 4 cm or more were 71% （15/21）, 86% （18/21）, and 100% （9/9）,respectively. In 29 surgically resected cases, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA using immunohistochemical analysis of GIST were 100%（24/24）, 80% （4/5）, 96% （24/25）, 100% （4/4）, and 97% （28/29）, respectively. No major complications were encountered.CONCLUSION： EUS-FNA with immunohistochemical analysis is a safe and accurate method in the pretherapeutic diagnosis of GIST. It should be taken into consideration in decision making, especially in early diagnosis following minimal invasive surgery for GIST.展开更多
Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Its application in patients with liver disease and portal hypertension is increasing. ...Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Its application in patients with liver disease and portal hypertension is increasing. Patients with chronic liver disease are at risk for development of portal hypertension sequale such as ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastroesophageal varices. Bleeding esophageal and gastric varices are among the most common causes of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, early detection and treatment improve the outcome in this population. EUS can improve the detection and diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices and collateral veins and can provide endoscopic therapy of gastroesophageal varices such as EUS-guided sclerotherapy of esophageal collateral vessels and EUS-guided cynoacrylate(Glue) injection of gastric varices. EUS can also provide knowledge on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy of portal hypertension. Furthermore, EUS can provide assessment and prediction of variceal recurrence after endoscopic therapy and assessment of portal hemodynamics such as E-Flow and Doppler study of the azygous and portal veins. Moreover, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may provide cytologic diagnosis of focal hepatic tumors andanalysis of free abdominal fluid.Using specialized EUSguided needle biopsy,a sample of liver tissue can be obtained to diagnose and evaluate for chronic liver disease.EUS-guided fine needle injection can be used to study portal vein pressure and hemodynamics,and potentially could be used to assist in exact measurement of portal vein pressure and placement of intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.展开更多
Pancreatic cancer(PC)remains one of the deadliest cancers worldwide,and has a poor,five-year survival rate of 5%.Although complete surgical resection is the only curative therapy for pancreatic cancer,less than20%of n...Pancreatic cancer(PC)remains one of the deadliest cancers worldwide,and has a poor,five-year survival rate of 5%.Although complete surgical resection is the only curative therapy for pancreatic cancer,less than20%of newly-diagnosed patients undergo surgical resection with a curative intent.Due to the lack of early symptoms and the tendency of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to invade adjacent structures or to metastasize at an early stage,many patients with pancreatic cancer already have advanced disease at the time of their diagnosis and,therefore,there is a high mortality rate.To improve the patient survival rate,early detection of PC is critical.The diagnosis of PC relies on computed tomography(CT)and/or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP),or biopsy or fine-needle aspiration using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS).Although multi-detector row computed tomography currently has a major role in the evaluation of PC,MRI with MRCP facilitates better detection of tumors at an early stage by allowing a comprehensive analysis of the morphological changes of the pancreas parenchyma and pancreatic duct.The diagnosis could be improved using positron emission tomography techniques in special conditions in which CT and EUS are not completely diagnostic.It is essential for clinicians to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various pancreatic imaging modalities in order to be able to make optimal treatment and management decisions.Our study investigates the current role and innovative techniques of pancreatic imaging focused on the detection of pancreatic cancer.展开更多
AIM： To establish an optimum combination of molecular markers resulting in best overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of suspicious pancreatic mass. METHODS： Endoscopic ultrasound （EUS）-gui...AIM： To establish an optimum combination of molecular markers resulting in best overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of suspicious pancreatic mass. METHODS： Endoscopic ultrasound （EUS）-guided fine needle aspiration cytology （FNA） was performed on 101 consecutive patients （63 males, 38 females, 60 ± 12 years; 81 with subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer, 20 with chronic pancreatitis） with focal pancreatic mass. Samples were evaluated on-site by an experienced cytopathologist. DNA was extracted from Giemsa stained cells selected by laser microdissection and the presence of K-ras, p53 and p16 somatic mutations was tested by cycling-gradient capillary electrophoresis （CGCE） and single-strand conformation polymorphism （SSCP） techniques. In addition, allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes p16 （INK4, CDKN2A） and DPC4 （MADH4, SMAD4） were detected by monitoring the loss of heterozygosity （LOH） at 9p and 18q, respectively. RESULTS： Sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided FNA were 75% and 85%, positive and negative predictive value reached 100%. The remaining 26% samples were assigned as inconclusive. Testing of molecular markers revealed sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 100% for K-ras mutations （P 〈 0.001）, 24% and 90% for p53 mutations （NS）, 13% and 100% for p16 mutations （NS）, 85% and 64% for aUelic losses at 9p （P 〈 0.001） and 78% and 57% for allelic losses at 18q （P 〈 0.05）. When tests for different molecular markers were combined, the best results were obtained with K-ras ＋ LOH at 9p （92% and 64%, P 〈 0.001）, K-ras ＋ LOH at 18q （92% and 57%, P 〈 0.001）, and K-ras ＋ LOH 9q ＋ LOH 18q （96% and 43%, P 〈 0.001）. When the molecular markers were used as complements to FNA cytology to evaluate inconclusive samples only, the overall sensitivity of cancer detection was 100% in all patients enrolled in the study. CONCLUSION： EUS-guided FNA cytology combined with screening of K-ras mutations and alle展开更多
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential tool for the study of pancreatic diseases. Specifically, EUS plays a pivotal role evaluating patients with a known or suspected pancreatic mass. In this setting, dif...Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential tool for the study of pancreatic diseases. Specifically, EUS plays a pivotal role evaluating patients with a known or suspected pancreatic mass. In this setting, differential diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) have been proven to be safe and useful tools in this setting. EUS-guided FNA and FNB, by obtaining cytological and/or histological samples, are able to diagnose pancreatic lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. In this context, several methodological features, trying to increase the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA and FNB, have been evaluated. In this review, we focus on the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). From data reported in the literature, ROSE may increase diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA specimens by 10%-30%, and thus, diagnostic accuracy. However, we should point out that many recent studies have reported adequacy rates of > 90% without ROSE, indicating that, perhaps, at high-volume centers, ROSE may not be indispensable to achieve excellent results. The use of ROSE can be considered important during the learning curve of EUS-FNA, and also in hospital with diagnostic accuracy rates < 90%.展开更多
文摘AIM： to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasonographyguided fine needle aspiration （EUS-FNA） in the preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor （GIST）.METHODS： From September 2002 to June 2006, Fiftythree consecutive EUS-FNAs of GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumors with continuity to proper muscle layer suspected as GIST by standard EUS were evaluated prospectively. The reference standards for the final diagnosis were surgery （n = 31）, or clinical follow-up （n = 22）. Additionally, immunophenotyping of specimens obtained by EUS-FNA and surgical resection specimens were compared.RESULTS： In 2 cases puncture was not performed because of anatomical problems. The collection rate of adequate specimens from the GI tract subepithelial hypoechoic tumor with continuity to proper muscle layer was 82% （42/51）. The diagnostic rate for the tumor less than 2 cm, 2 to 4 cm, and 4 cm or more were 71% （15/21）, 86% （18/21）, and 100% （9/9）,respectively. In 29 surgically resected cases, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA using immunohistochemical analysis of GIST were 100%（24/24）, 80% （4/5）, 96% （24/25）, 100% （4/4）, and 97% （28/29）, respectively. No major complications were encountered.CONCLUSION： EUS-FNA with immunohistochemical analysis is a safe and accurate method in the pretherapeutic diagnosis of GIST. It should be taken into consideration in decision making, especially in early diagnosis following minimal invasive surgery for GIST.
文摘Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients with gastrointestinal disorders. Its application in patients with liver disease and portal hypertension is increasing. Patients with chronic liver disease are at risk for development of portal hypertension sequale such as ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastroesophageal varices. Bleeding esophageal and gastric varices are among the most common causes of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, early detection and treatment improve the outcome in this population. EUS can improve the detection and diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices and collateral veins and can provide endoscopic therapy of gastroesophageal varices such as EUS-guided sclerotherapy of esophageal collateral vessels and EUS-guided cynoacrylate(Glue) injection of gastric varices. EUS can also provide knowledge on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy of portal hypertension. Furthermore, EUS can provide assessment and prediction of variceal recurrence after endoscopic therapy and assessment of portal hemodynamics such as E-Flow and Doppler study of the azygous and portal veins. Moreover, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may provide cytologic diagnosis of focal hepatic tumors andanalysis of free abdominal fluid.Using specialized EUSguided needle biopsy,a sample of liver tissue can be obtained to diagnose and evaluate for chronic liver disease.EUS-guided fine needle injection can be used to study portal vein pressure and hemodynamics,and potentially could be used to assist in exact measurement of portal vein pressure and placement of intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
文摘Pancreatic cancer(PC)remains one of the deadliest cancers worldwide,and has a poor,five-year survival rate of 5%.Although complete surgical resection is the only curative therapy for pancreatic cancer,less than20%of newly-diagnosed patients undergo surgical resection with a curative intent.Due to the lack of early symptoms and the tendency of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to invade adjacent structures or to metastasize at an early stage,many patients with pancreatic cancer already have advanced disease at the time of their diagnosis and,therefore,there is a high mortality rate.To improve the patient survival rate,early detection of PC is critical.The diagnosis of PC relies on computed tomography(CT)and/or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP),or biopsy or fine-needle aspiration using endoscopic ultrasound(EUS).Although multi-detector row computed tomography currently has a major role in the evaluation of PC,MRI with MRCP facilitates better detection of tumors at an early stage by allowing a comprehensive analysis of the morphological changes of the pancreas parenchyma and pancreatic duct.The diagnosis could be improved using positron emission tomography techniques in special conditions in which CT and EUS are not completely diagnostic.It is essential for clinicians to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various pancreatic imaging modalities in order to be able to make optimal treatment and management decisions.Our study investigates the current role and innovative techniques of pancreatic imaging focused on the detection of pancreatic cancer.
基金Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, No. 8027-3
文摘AIM： To establish an optimum combination of molecular markers resulting in best overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of suspicious pancreatic mass. METHODS： Endoscopic ultrasound （EUS）-guided fine needle aspiration cytology （FNA） was performed on 101 consecutive patients （63 males, 38 females, 60 ± 12 years; 81 with subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer, 20 with chronic pancreatitis） with focal pancreatic mass. Samples were evaluated on-site by an experienced cytopathologist. DNA was extracted from Giemsa stained cells selected by laser microdissection and the presence of K-ras, p53 and p16 somatic mutations was tested by cycling-gradient capillary electrophoresis （CGCE） and single-strand conformation polymorphism （SSCP） techniques. In addition, allelic losses of tumor suppressor genes p16 （INK4, CDKN2A） and DPC4 （MADH4, SMAD4） were detected by monitoring the loss of heterozygosity （LOH） at 9p and 18q, respectively. RESULTS： Sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided FNA were 75% and 85%, positive and negative predictive value reached 100%. The remaining 26% samples were assigned as inconclusive. Testing of molecular markers revealed sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 100% for K-ras mutations （P 〈 0.001）, 24% and 90% for p53 mutations （NS）, 13% and 100% for p16 mutations （NS）, 85% and 64% for aUelic losses at 9p （P 〈 0.001） and 78% and 57% for allelic losses at 18q （P 〈 0.05）. When tests for different molecular markers were combined, the best results were obtained with K-ras ＋ LOH at 9p （92% and 64%, P 〈 0.001）, K-ras ＋ LOH at 18q （92% and 57%, P 〈 0.001）, and K-ras ＋ LOH 9q ＋ LOH 18q （96% and 43%, P 〈 0.001）. When the molecular markers were used as complements to FNA cytology to evaluate inconclusive samples only, the overall sensitivity of cancer detection was 100% in all patients enrolled in the study. CONCLUSION： EUS-guided FNA cytology combined with screening of K-ras mutations and alle
文摘Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential tool for the study of pancreatic diseases. Specifically, EUS plays a pivotal role evaluating patients with a known or suspected pancreatic mass. In this setting, differential diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) have been proven to be safe and useful tools in this setting. EUS-guided FNA and FNB, by obtaining cytological and/or histological samples, are able to diagnose pancreatic lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. In this context, several methodological features, trying to increase the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA and FNB, have been evaluated. In this review, we focus on the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). From data reported in the literature, ROSE may increase diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA specimens by 10%-30%, and thus, diagnostic accuracy. However, we should point out that many recent studies have reported adequacy rates of > 90% without ROSE, indicating that, perhaps, at high-volume centers, ROSE may not be indispensable to achieve excellent results. The use of ROSE can be considered important during the learning curve of EUS-FNA, and also in hospital with diagnostic accuracy rates < 90%.
