期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Excitation-Contraction Coupling Time is More Sensitive in Evaluating Cardiac Systolic Function 被引量:3
1
作者 Juan Gao Min Zhu +3 位作者 Hai-Yi Yu Shi-Qiang Wang Xin-Heng Feng Ming Xu 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第15期1834-1839,共6页
Background: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation-contraction coupling occurs as early... Background: Pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy is a key step leading to heart failure. Previous cellular and animal studies demonstrated that deteriorated excitation-contraction coupling occurs as early as the compensated stage of hypertrophy before the global decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study was to evaluate the cardiac electromechanical coupling time in evaluating cardiac systolic function in the early stage of heart failure. Methods: Twenty-six patients with Stage B heart failure (SBHF) and 31 healthy controls (CONs) were enrolled in this study. M-mode echocardiography was performed to measure LVEF. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) combined with electrocardiography (ECG) was used to measure cardiac electromechanical coupling time. Results: There was no significant difference in LVEF between SBHF patients and CONs (64.23 ± 8.91% vs. 64.52 ± 5.90%; P= 0.886). However, all four electromechanical coupling time courses (Qsb: onset of Q wave on ECG to beginning of S wave on TDI, Qst: onset of Q wave on ECG to top of S wave on TDI, Rsb: top of R wave on ECG to beginning orS wave on TDI, and Rst: top of R wave on ECG to top orS wave on TDI) of SBHF patients were significantly longer than those of CONs (Qsb: 119.19 ± 35.68 ms vs. 80.30 ± 14.81 ms, P 〈 0.001 ; Qst: 165.42 ± 60.93 ms vs. 129.04 ± 16.97 ms, P = 0.006; Rsb: 82.43 ± 33.66 ms vs. 48.30 ± 15.18 ms, P 〈 0.001; and Rst: 122.37 ± 36.66 ins vs. 93.25 ± 16.72 ms, P = 0.001 ), and the Qsb, Rsb, and Rst time showed a significantly higher sensitivity than LVEF (Rst: P =0.032; Rsb: P = 0.003; and Qsb: P = 0.004). Conclusions: The cardiac electromechanical coupling time is more sensitive than LVEF in evaluating cardiac systolic function. 展开更多
关键词 excitation-contraction couplings Heart Failure Left Ventricular Dysfunction
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部