期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Combined subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery and endovenous laser treatment without impact on the great saphenous vein for management of lower-extremity varicose veins 被引量:19
1
作者 GAN Shu-jie QIAN Shui-xian ZHANG Ci MAO Jie-qi LI Ke TANG Jing-dong 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第3期405-408,共4页
Background Conventional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) has a good curative effect but is highly traumatic with a considerable relapse rate. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (S... Background Conventional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) has a good curative effect but is highly traumatic with a considerable relapse rate. Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) plus endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) could be applied as individual therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of performing combined SEPS and EVLT without impacting GSV in the management of valvular insufficiency of the lower-limb venous perforators. Methods Placement of lower-limb venous perforator insufficiency was marked by ascending phlebography in 83 affected limbs from September 2010 to June 2011. After randomization, SEPS was performed on 41 limbs to address the insufficiency of the venous perforators under the deep fascia, in combination with EVLT to close the superficial varicose veins without impacting the GSV. The remaining 42 limbs were treated using traditional GSV phlebectomy as controls. Results Postoperatively, all varicose veins were resolved, with lightening of the pigmentation and healing of the ulcer. Within a follow-up period of 5-11 months, no symptoms had recurred. Compared with the control group, the operation time, the number of incisions sutured, and the in-hospital time decreased on average by 1.5 hours, 4.7, and 6.8 days, respectively (P 〈0.01 in all cases). Conclusion Combined SEPS and EVLT for treatment of valvular insufficiency of the lower-limb venous perforators offer the advantages of microtrauma and rapid cure. 展开更多
关键词 varicose veins perforator subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery endoscopic perforator surgery endovenous laser treatment endovenous laser treatment
原文传递
腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术在下肢复杂性溃疡中的应用 被引量:3
2
作者 甄庆强 刘艳芬 +1 位作者 王玉涛 孙岩 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2021年第4期299-302,307,共5页
目的:对比腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术与交通静脉腔内激光闭合术治疗下肢动静脉复杂性溃疡的效果。方法:将2014年1月至2018年1月收治的131例动静脉复杂性溃疡患者随机分为治疗组(67例,83条肢体)与对照组(64例,89条肢体),治疗组采用腔镜筋膜... 目的:对比腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术与交通静脉腔内激光闭合术治疗下肢动静脉复杂性溃疡的效果。方法:将2014年1月至2018年1月收治的131例动静脉复杂性溃疡患者随机分为治疗组(67例,83条肢体)与对照组(64例,89条肢体),治疗组采用腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术联合压迫疗法,对照组采用交通静脉腔内激光闭合术联合压迫疗法,对比两组治疗效果。结果:对照组手术时间[(26.05±5.76)min vs.(35.55±6.17)min]、术中出血量[3.52(2.02~4.26)mL vs.6.47(5.30~8.24)mL]优于治疗组(P<0.05);治疗组溃疡面积[(6.33±2.10)cm 2 vs.(10.41±4.02)cm 2]、静脉临床严重程度评分[7(5~9)vs.8(6~10)]、术后生活质量评分[(113.27±7.29)vs.(108.66±11.47)]优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术与交通静脉腔内激光闭合术联合压迫疗法是治疗动静脉复杂性溃疡的合理方案,腔镜筋膜下交通支离断术联合压迫疗法疗效更为显著。 展开更多
关键词 复杂性溃疡 筋膜下交通支离断术 内窥镜检查 交通静脉腔内激光闭合术 压迫疗法
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部