Transarterial chemoembolization （TACE） is a form of intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy that selectively delivers high doses of cytotoxic drug to the tumor bed combining with the effect of ischemic necrosis i...Transarterial chemoembolization （TACE） is a form of intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy that selectively delivers high doses of cytotoxic drug to the tumor bed combining with the effect of ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization. Chemoembolization and radioembolization are at the core of the treatment of liver hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC） patients who cannot receive potentially curative therapies such as transplantation, resection or percutaneous ablation. TACE for liver cancer has been proven to be useful in local tumor control, to prevent tumor progression, prolong patients＇ life and control patient symptoms. Recent evidence showed in patients with single-nodule HCC of 3 cm or smaller without vascular invasion, the 5-year overall survival （OS） with TACE was similar to that with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation. Mthough being used for decades, Lipiodol~ （Lipiodol~ Ultra Fluid~, Guerbet, France） remains important as a tumor-seeking and radio-opaque clrug delivery vector in intervendonal oncology. There have been efforts to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. Drug-eluting bead （DEB） is a relatively novel drug delivery embolization system which allows for fixed dosing and the ability to release the anticancer agents in a sustained manner. Three DEBs are available, i.e., Tandem~ （CeloNova Biosciences Inc., USA）, DC-Beads~ （BTG, UK） and HepaSphere~ （BioSphere Medical, Inc., USA）. Transarterial radioembolization （TARE） technique has been developed, and proven to be efficient and safe in advanced liver cancers and those with vascular complications. Two types of radioembolization microspheres are available i.e., SIR-Spheres~ （Sirtex Medical Limited, Australia） and TheraSphere~ （BTG, UK）. This review describes the basic procedure of TACE, properties and efficacy of some chemoembolization systems and radioembolization agents which are commercially available and/or currently under clinical evaluation. The key clinical tria展开更多
Coronary stem implantation has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention and enabled the management of early complications of plain balloon angioplasty. However, a new complication has accompanied thes...Coronary stem implantation has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention and enabled the management of early complications of plain balloon angioplasty. However, a new complication has accompanied these improvements： in-stent restenosis （ISR） arising from neointimal hyperplasia. ISR after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the main limitations of this method, leading to the recurrence of exertional angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes. The clinical incidence of ISR after bare-metal stent （BMS） implantation is approximately 20%35%. The use of drug-eluting stents （DES） has led to a further decrease in the occurrence of ISR to 5%-10%. Evidence resulting from controlled clinical studies suggests that DES and drug-eluting balloon catheters （DEB） provide the best clinical and angiographic results in the treatment of ISR. We undertook a systematic review of the pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment options for BMS- and DES-ISR. We discuss recent randomised studies, comparing different DES or DEB used for BMS or DES-ISR treatment, as well as the use of new biovascular scafolds and the topic of scafold restenosis.展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is the fifth most common tumor worldwide.Multiple treatment options are available for HCC including curative resection,liver transplantation,radiofrequency ablation,trans-arterial chemoemb...Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is the fifth most common tumor worldwide.Multiple treatment options are available for HCC including curative resection,liver transplantation,radiofrequency ablation,trans-arterial chemoembolization,radioembolization and systemic targeted agent like sorafenib.The treatment of HCC depends on the tumor stage,patient performance status and liver function reserve and requires a multidisciplinary approach.In the past few years with significant advances in surgical treatments and locoregional therapies,the short-term survival of HCC has improved but the recurrent disease remains a big problem.The pathogenesis of HCC is a multistep and complex process,wherein angiogenesis plays an important role.For patients with advanced disease,sorafenib is the only approved therapy,but novel systemic molecular targeted agents and their combinations are emerging.This article provides an overview of treatment of early and advanced stage HCC based on our extensive review of relevant literature.展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide.While curative therapies,including resection,liver transplantation,and percutaneous ablation(percutaneous ethanol injection and radio...Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide.While curative therapies,including resection,liver transplantation,and percutaneous ablation(percutaneous ethanol injection and radiofrequency ablation),are applicable for only a portion of the HCC population,transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)has been recognized as an effective palliative treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.TACE is also used even for single HCCs in which it is difficult to perform surgical resection or locoregional treatment due to systemic co-morbidities or anatomical problems.TACE has become widely adopted in the treatment of HCC.By using computed tomography-angiography,TACE is capable of performing diagnosis and treatment at the same time.Furthermore,TACE plays an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment for HCC when combined with other treatment.In this review,we first discuss the history of TACE,and then review the previous findings about techniques of achieving a locoregional treatment effect(liver infarction treatment,e.g.,ultra-selective TACE,balloon-occluded TACE),and the use of TACE as a drugdelivery system for anti-cancer agents(palliative,e.g.,platinum complex agents,drug-eluting beads)for multiple lesions.展开更多
Background Prognosis of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） and renal dysfunction （RD） who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has not been fully investigated in ...Background Prognosis of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） and renal dysfunction （RD） who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has not been fully investigated in the drug-eluting stent （DES） era. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of admission serum creatinine level on short-term outcomes in patients with acute STEMI undergoing DES-based primary PCI. Methods Primary PCI with DES implantation was attempted in 619 consecutive STEMI patients within 12 hours of symptom onset. Among them, 86 patients had a serum creatinine level ≥115 μmol/L on admission （RD group）, and the remaining 533 patients had normal renal function （non-RD group）. The primary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiac events （MACE, including death, non-fatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization）, and the secondary endpoint was subacute stent thrombosis. Results Patients in the RD group were older than those in the non-RD group. There are more female patients in the RD group and they had a history of hypertension, myocardial infarction and revascularization. The occurrence rates of Killip class ≥2 （29.1% vs 18.6%, P=0.02） and multi-vessel （62.8% vs 44.5%, P=0.001） and triple vessel disease （32.6% vs 18.2%, P=0.002）, in-hospital mortality （9.3% vs 3.8%, P=0.03）, and MACE rate during hospitalization （17.4% vs 7.7%, P=-0.006） were higher in the RD group than those in the non-RD group. At a 30-day clinical follow-up, the MACE-free survival rate was significantly reduced in the RD group （76.7% vs 89.9%, P=-0.0003）. Angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 3 （3.5%） and 7 （1.3%） of patients in the RD group and non-RD group, respectively （P=0.15）. Multivariate analysis revealed that the serum creatinine level 〉115 μmol/L on admission was an independent predictor for MACE rate at a 30-day follow-up （Hazard ratio （HR） 3.31,95% CI 1.19-9.18, P 〈0.001）. Conclusion Despite similar prevalence of stent thrombosis a展开更多
Background:Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging;a simple strategy has been preferred as of late,but the disadvantage is ostium stenosis or even occlusion of the side branch(SB).Only a few sing...Background:Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging;a simple strategy has been preferred as of late,but the disadvantage is ostium stenosis or even occlusion of the side branch(SB).Only a few single-center studies investigating the combination of a drug-eluting stent in the main branch followed by a drug-eluting balloon in the SB have been reported.This prospective,multicenter,randomized study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon(PEB)compared with regular balloon angioplasty(BA)in the treatment of non-left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.Methods:Between December 2014 and November 2015,a total of 222 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions were enrolled in this study at ten Chinese centers.Patients were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to a PEB group(n=113)and a BA group(n=109).The primary efficacy endpoint was angiographic target lesion stenosis at 9 months.Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints included target lesion revascularization,target vessel revascularization,target lesion failure,major adverse cardiac and cerebral events(MACCEs),all-cause death,cardiac death,non-fatal myocardial infarction,and thrombosis in target lesions.The main analyses performed in this clinical trial included case shedding analysis,base-value equilibrium analysis,effectiveness analysis,and safety analysis.SAS version 9.4 was used for the statistical analyses.Results:At the 9-month angiographic follow-up,the difference in the primary efficacy endpoint of target lesion stenosis between the PEB(28.7%±18.7%)and BA groups(40.0%±19.0%)was-11.3%(95%confidence interval:-16.3%to-6.3%,Psuperiority<0.0001)in the intention-to-treat analysis,and similar results were recorded in the per-protocol analysis,demonstrating the superiority of PEB to BA.Late lumen loss was significantly lower in the PEB group than in the BA group(-0.06±0.32 vs.0.18±0.34 mm,P<0.0001).For intention-to-treat,there were no significant differences between PEB and BA in the 9-month percentages o展开更多
Background： Currently, drug-eluting balloon （DEB） appears to be an attractive alternative option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis （ISR）. Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes of DEB have seldom been compare...Background： Currently, drug-eluting balloon （DEB） appears to be an attractive alternative option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis （ISR）. Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes of DEB have seldom been compared to those of new-generation drug-eluting stent （DES）. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEB compared to those of new-generation DES in the treatment of ISR. Methods： A comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to November 2, 2017 was performed to identify pertinent articles comparing DEB to new-generation DES for the treatment of ISR. In addition, conference proceedings for the scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, and EuroPCR were also searched. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization （TLR） at the longest follow-up. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios （RRs） with 95% confidence intervals （C/s）, while the overall RRs were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Results： Five randomized controlled trials （RCTs） and eight observational studies involving 2743 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, DEB was comparable to new-generation DES in terms ofTLR （RR = 1.24, 95% CI： 0.89-1.72, P = 0.21 ）, cardiac death （RR = 1.55, 95% CI： 0.89-2.71, P= 0.12）, major adverse cardiovascular event （RR = 1.21,95% CI： 0.98-1.48, P = 0.07）, myocardial infarction （RR = 1.12, 95% CI： 0.72-1.76, P = 0.62）, and stent thrombosis （RR = 0.95, 95% CI： 0.38-2.42, P associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality than new-generation DES （RR = 1.65, 95% CI： 1.09-2.50, P = true in the real-world observational studies （RR = 1.79, 95% CI： 1.12-2.88, P = 0.02）. In RCTs, however, no found between the two treatment strategies in the risk of all-cause mortality. 0.92）. However, DEB was 展开更多
Background Several clinical trials have shown that rapamycin-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The Firebird stent and the Excel stent （coated...Background Several clinical trials have shown that rapamycin-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The Firebird stent and the Excel stent （coated with bioabsorbable polymer） are two different types of rapamycin-eluUng stents made in China, both have been recently approved for clinical use in China by State Food and Drug Administration. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of stents in daily practice. Methods In the month of June 2006, a total of 190 consecutive patients were treated exclusively with Firebird stents （n=93, Firebird group） or Excel stents （n=97, Excel group） in our center and were included in this study. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events （MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization）, binary restenosis, and late lumen loss and stent thrombosis dudng a six-month follow-up period were compared between the two groups. Results Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates were low in hospital and at 6 months （2.1% in the Excel group and 0% in the Firebird group, P〉 0.05）. The 6-month angiographic in-stent restenosis rate was 0% in both groups, with an associated late loss of （0.15 ± 0.21） mm versus （0.14 ± 0.20） mm （P=0.858） and the in-segment restenosis rate was also 0% for the Excel group and the Firebird group. There was no definite stent thrombosis identified in either group during the six-month follow-up period and only one patient in the Excel group had probable stent thrombosis in hospital. Conclusions Results from this mid-term, single-center study showed that both of the Firebird and the Excel rapamycin eluUng stent had similar effects on reducing the incidence of MACE and the risk of restenosis （both in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis） after PCI in daily practice.展开更多
Background The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） versus bare metal stents （BMS） are unclear and controversial issues in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） und...Background The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） versus bare metal stents （BMS） are unclear and controversial issues in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DES versus BMS implantation. Methods A total of 191 patients with acute STEMI undergoing PCI from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2007 were enrolled. Patients received DES （n=83） or BMS （n=108） implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician＇s discretion. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events （MACE）, which was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction （MI）, target vessel revascularization （TVR） and stent thrombosis. The difference of MACE was observed between DES and BMS groups. Results The clinical follow-up duration was 3 years （（41.7±16.1） months）. MACE occurred in 20 patients during three years follow-up. Logistic regression analysis showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） was an independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period （P=0.0301）. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality （3.61% vs. 7.41%, P=0.2647）, the incidence of myocardial infarction （0 vs. 0.93%, P=-0.379） and stent thrombosis （1.20% vs. 1.85%, P=0.727） between the DES group and BMS group. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the DES group compared to the BMS group （4.82% vs. 14.81%, P=0.0253）. The rate of TVR was also lower in the DES group （0 vs. 5.56%, P=0.029）. In the DES group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between sirolimus eluting stents （SES, n=73） and paclitaxel-eluting stents （PES, n=10） subgroups （2.74% vs. 20.00%, P 〉0.05）. Conclusions This finding suggested that drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the need for revascularization in pa展开更多
Background Several clinical trials have shown that sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The FIREBIRD stent （coated with durable polyme...Background Several clinical trials have shown that sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The FIREBIRD stent （coated with durable polymer） and the EXCEL stent （coated with bioabsorbable polymer） are two different types of sirolimus-eluting stents made in China; both have been approved for clinical use in China by the State Food and Drug Administration. The mid-term （6-month） angiographic and clinical results of both stents have been confirmed exciting perspective outcomes. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in the long-term safety and efficacy between the two types of stents in daily practice.Methods All consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI with EXCEL or FIREBIRD stents between June 1,2006 and December 31, 2006 at Fu Wai Hospital in Beijing were included. Patients were classified from the index admission according to stent types （EXCEL or FIREBIRD） used. Clinical and procedural risk factors were collected prospectively. With propensity score matching without replacement, the frequency of major adverse cardiac events （MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization） and stent thrombosis during a 2-year follow-up period were compared between the two groups.Results A total of 474 patients were treated with EXCEL, and 640 were treated with FIREBIRD. Three hundred and ninety-seven EXCEL patients were matched to 397 FIREBIRD patients, 2-year risk-adjusted MACE rates were 6.1% in EXCEL group and 7.6% in FIREBIRD group （HR 0.84, 95%CI0.50-1.43）, whereas the respective rates for mortality, myocardial infarction and target-vessel revascularization were 2.3% vs 2.8% （HR 0.74, 95%CI0.30-0.85）, 1.8% vs 1.3% （HR 1.41,95%CI 0.45-4.43） and 2.5% vs 4.0% （HR 0.62, 95%CI0.28-0.37）, respectively. Cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis at 2 years was 1.8% in the EXCEL group vs 1.3% in the FIREBIRD group （P=0.5610）, whereas the rate of very late stent展开更多
Background Drug-eluting stent （DES） has been used widely for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without diabetes mellitus during percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）, but its long-t...Background Drug-eluting stent （DES） has been used widely for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without diabetes mellitus during percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）, but its long-term safety and efficacy in diabetic patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after primary coronary intervention with DES implantation for diabetic patients with acute STEMI, compared with non-diabetic counterparts. Methods From December 2004 to March 2006, 56 consecutive diabetic patients （diabetic group） and 170 non-diabetic patients （non-diabetic group） with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI with DES implantation in 3 hospitals were enrolled. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, as well as occurrence of major adverse cardiac event （MACE） including cardiac death, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction （re-MI） and target vessel revascularization （TVR） during hospitalization and one-year clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results Patients in diabetic group were more hyperlipidemic （69.6% and 51.8%, P=-0.03） and had longer time delay from symptom onset to admission （（364±219） minutes and （309±223） minutes, P=-0.02） than those in non-diabetic group. The culprit vessel distribution, reference vessel diameter, and baseline TIMI flow grade were similar between the two groups, but multi-vessel disease was more common in diabetic than in non-diabetic group （82.1% and 51.2%, P〈0.001）. Despite similar TIMI flow grades between the two groups after stenting, the occurrence of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade （TMPG） 〉2 was lower in diabetic group （75.0% vs 88.8% in non-diabetic groups, P=-0.02）. The MACE rate was similar during hospitalization between the two groups （5.4% vs 3.5%, P=-0.72）, but it was significantly higher in diabetic group （16.1%） during one-year follow-up, as compared with non-d展开更多
This article describes the evolution of minimally invasive intervention technologies for vascular restoration therapy from early-stage balloon angioplasty in 1970s,metallic bare metal stent and metallic drug-eluting s...This article describes the evolution of minimally invasive intervention technologies for vascular restoration therapy from early-stage balloon angioplasty in 1970s,metallic bare metal stent and metallic drug-eluting stent technologies in 1990s and 2000s,to bioresorbable vascular scaffold(BVS)technology in large-scale development in recent years.The history,the current stage,the challenges and the future of BVS development are discussed in detail as the best available approach for vascular restoration therapy.The criteria of materials selection,design and processing principles of BVS,and the corresponding clinical trial results are also summarized in this article.展开更多
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) are at a higher risk of developing coronary artery disease(CAD) than are non-T2 DM patients. Moreover, the clinical outcomes in CAD with T2 DM are poor despite improvements...Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) are at a higher risk of developing coronary artery disease(CAD) than are non-T2 DM patients. Moreover, the clinical outcomes in CAD with T2 DM are poor despite improvements in medications and other interventions. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in treating multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. However, selecting a revascularization strategy depends not only on the lesion complexity but also on the patient's medical history and comorbidities. Additionally, comprehensive risk management with medical and non-pharmacological therapies is important, as is confirmation regarding whether the risk-management strategies are being appropriately achieved. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions using exercise and diet during the earlier stages of glucose metabolism abnormalities, such as impaired glucose tolerance, might be beneficial in preventing the development or progression of T2 DM and in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events.展开更多
Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure involving intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy to selectively administer high doses of cytotoxic drugs to the tumor bed along with ischemic...Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure involving intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy to selectively administer high doses of cytotoxic drugs to the tumor bed along with ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization.Chemoembolization forms the essential core of management in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) who are not suitable for curative therapies such as transplantation,resection,or percutaneous ablation.TACE of hepatic cancer(s) has proven to be helpful in achieving local tumor control,and has supported the ability to prevent tumor progression,prolong patient life,and manage patient symptoms.Recent data have demonstrated that,in patients with single-nodule HCC ≤3 cm without vascular invasion,the 5-year overall survival with TACE was found to be comparable with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation.Used for several years,Lipiodol continues to play a vital role as a tumor-seeking and radiopaque drug delivery vector in interventional oncology.Efforts have been made to enhance the administration of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors.Compared with conventional TACE,drug-eluting bead TACE is a fairly new drug delivery embolization technique that permits fixed dosing and has the ability to provide sustained release of anticancer agents over a period of time.The present review discusses the basic procedure of TACE and its properties,and the effectiveness of conventional and drug-eluting bead chemoembolization systems currently available or presently undergoing clinical evaluation.展开更多
Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of therapy for patients with intermediatestage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. The concept of ...Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of therapy for patients with intermediatestage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. The concept of conventional TACE(cTACE) is the selective obstruction of tumor-feeding artery by injection of chemotherapeutic agents, leading to ischemic necrosis of the target tumor via cytotoxic and ischemic effects. Drugeluting beads(DEBs) have been imposed as novel drugdelivering agents for TACE, which allows for higher concentrations of drugs within the target tumor and lower systemic concentrations compared with cTACE. Despite the theoretical advantages of DEB-TACE, it is still controversial in clinical practice as to whether DEBTACE is superior to cTACE in regard to overall survival and treatment response. In this review article, we summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE for patients with intermediate or advanced stage HCC in comparison with cTACE.展开更多
Background Patients with small coronary lesions are at increased risk for repeat interventions after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） has been demonstrated to improve the ...Background Patients with small coronary lesions are at increased risk for repeat interventions after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） has been demonstrated to improve the outcomes of these patients and is a focus of interest. Currently, two platforms of DES are available （sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） and paclitaxel-eluting stent （PES））. However, it has less been known that DES, SES vs PES, is superior for the treatment of small coronary lesions. Methods In this retrospective study, 87 consecutive patients with 151 lesions underwent implantation of coronary SES （n=68） and PES （n=83）. Quantitative coronary angiography （QCA） was performed at the time of stent implantation and subsequently at 8 months post-stenting. Small vessel disease was defined as lesions in vessels with diameter 42.5 mm measured by QCA. Major adverse cardiac events （MACE） including death, thrombosis, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization （TLR） were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. At clinical and angiographic follow-up, overall thrombosis rates were similar in both groups （0 vs 1.2%, P〉0.05）. The TLR and in-segment restenosis were not significantly different （19.1% vs 25.3%; 10.3% vs 10.8%, P=0.365 and P=0.913 respectively） between the two groups. The in-stent restenosis rate, however, was significantly higher in the PES group （4.4% vs 21.7%; P=0.002）. Similarly, the late loss was significantly higher in the PES group （（0.14±0.38） mm vs （0.49±0.61） mm; P〈0.001）. Conclusions In this small sample-size, non-randomized study, the data indicated that implantation of SES for the treatment of patients with small coronary lesion showed more favorable results in respect of restenosis compared with PES implantation.展开更多
Background： There are limited data on longer-term outcomes （〉5 years） for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery （ULMCA） disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in the drug-...Background： There are limited data on longer-term outcomes （〉5 years） for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery （ULMCA） disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in the drug-eluting stents （DES） era. This study aimed at comparing the long-term （〉5 years） outcomes of patients with ULMCA disease underwent PCI with DES and coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and the predictors of adverse events. Methods： All consecutive patients with ULMCA disease treated with DES implantation versus CABG in our center, between January 2003 and July 2009, were screened for analyzing. A propensity score analysis was carried out to adjust for potential confounding between the two groups. Results： Nine hundred and twenty-two patients with ULMCA disease were enrolled for the analyses （DES = 465 vs. CABG = 457）. During the median follow-up of 7.1 years （interquartile range 5.3-8.2 years）, no difference was found between PCI and CABG in the occurrence of death （P = 0.282） and the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction （MI） and stroke （P = 0.294）. Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI group （P = 0.014） in large part because of the significantly higher rate of repeat revascularization （P 〈 0.001）. PC/was correlated with the lower occurrence of stroke （P = 0.004）. Multivariate analysis showed ejection fraction （EF） （P = 0.012）, creatinine （P = 0.016）, and prior stroke （P = 0.03 l） were independent predictors of the composite endpoint of cardiac death, MI, and stroke in the DES group, while age （P = 0.026） and EF （P = 0.002） were independent predictors in the CABG group. Conclusions： During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, there was no difference in the rate of death between PCI with DES implantation and CABG in ULMCA lesions in the patient cohort. CABG group was observed to have significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization but 展开更多
Background Previous studies indicated that long coronary lesions are one of the key predictors of drug-eluting stent （DES） failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the long l...Background Previous studies indicated that long coronary lesions are one of the key predictors of drug-eluting stent （DES） failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the long length FIREHAWK stent in long coronary artery disease. Methods The long cohort of TARGET I was a prospective, multicenter, single arm trial. It was planned to enroll 50 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for the treatment of de novo long lesions in a native coronary artery. The major inclusion criteria of the trial was that patients were intended to undergo the treatment of a long target lesion（s） with diameter stenosis 〉70% and reference vessel diameter 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm by visual estimate, that needed to be covered by at least one 33 mm or 38 mm stent or multiple long stents overlapped. The angiographic follow-up was planned at 9-month and the clinical follow-up will be up to 5 years. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month. Results Fifty patients （mean age （57.6±10.2） years） with 59 de novo long lesions （reference vessel diameter （2.85±0.44） mm, lesion length （35.2±9.4） mm, and stent length （41.8±11.3） mm） were enrolled. The angiographic follow-up rate was 92% at 9-month. The in-stent late loss was （0.16±0.16） mm. Proximal edge, distal edge and in-segment late loss （mm） were 0.21±0.35, 0.03±0.33, and 0.07±0.26, respectively. No in-segment binary restenosis was observed. At 1-year no death, Q wave myocardial infarction （MI）, or stent thrombosis occurred. Non-Q-wave MI occurred in two patients （4%） due to procedural complications. Conclusions Treatment of long coronary lesions with the FIREHAWK stent is able to produce similar results as observed in the FIREHAWK~ FIM clinical trial. Based on this result, we are confident in the treatment prospect of the FIREHAWK for long coronary lesions.展开更多
AIM To assess the usefulness of intra-arterial contrastenhanced ultrasonography(IAUS) during transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) with drug-eluting beads(DEB) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS Thirty two pati...AIM To assess the usefulness of intra-arterial contrastenhanced ultrasonography(IAUS) during transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) with drug-eluting beads(DEB) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS Thirty two patients with 39 HCC underwent DEB-TACE guided with IAUS, and examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) or dynamic CT after DEB-TACE were enrolled in this study. CEUS findings before DEBTACE and IAUS findings were compared. Treatments judged to be complete and incomplete for lesions were appropriate and insufficient, respectively. Findings on CEUS and/or dynamic CT performed 1, 3 and 6 mo after DEB-TACE were evaluated using m RECIST(CR/PR/SD/PD).RESULTS The treatments were complete and incomplete in 26 and 13 lesions, respectively. On imaging evaluation using CEUS and/or dynamic CT one month after treatment, 25 and 1 lesions were judged to be CR and PR, respectively, and at 6 mo after treatment, the results were CR, PR, SD and PD for 24, 1, 0 and 1 of these lesions, respectively, in the 26 completely treated lesions. Of the 13 lesions in which treatment was incomplete, the results on imaging at one month after treatment were CR, PR, SD and PD for 0, 6, 4 and 3 lesions, respectively. The overall CR rate at 6 mo after treatment was 61.5%(24/39).CONCLUSION A combination of DEB-TACE with IAUS can improve the therapeutic effects in patients with HCC.展开更多
文摘Transarterial chemoembolization （TACE） is a form of intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy that selectively delivers high doses of cytotoxic drug to the tumor bed combining with the effect of ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization. Chemoembolization and radioembolization are at the core of the treatment of liver hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC） patients who cannot receive potentially curative therapies such as transplantation, resection or percutaneous ablation. TACE for liver cancer has been proven to be useful in local tumor control, to prevent tumor progression, prolong patients＇ life and control patient symptoms. Recent evidence showed in patients with single-nodule HCC of 3 cm or smaller without vascular invasion, the 5-year overall survival （OS） with TACE was similar to that with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation. Mthough being used for decades, Lipiodol~ （Lipiodol~ Ultra Fluid~, Guerbet, France） remains important as a tumor-seeking and radio-opaque clrug delivery vector in intervendonal oncology. There have been efforts to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. Drug-eluting bead （DEB） is a relatively novel drug delivery embolization system which allows for fixed dosing and the ability to release the anticancer agents in a sustained manner. Three DEBs are available, i.e., Tandem~ （CeloNova Biosciences Inc., USA）, DC-Beads~ （BTG, UK） and HepaSphere~ （BioSphere Medical, Inc., USA）. Transarterial radioembolization （TARE） technique has been developed, and proven to be efficient and safe in advanced liver cancers and those with vascular complications. Two types of radioembolization microspheres are available i.e., SIR-Spheres~ （Sirtex Medical Limited, Australia） and TheraSphere~ （BTG, UK）. This review describes the basic procedure of TACE, properties and efficacy of some chemoembolization systems and radioembolization agents which are commercially available and/or currently under clinical evaluation. The key clinical tria
文摘Coronary stem implantation has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention and enabled the management of early complications of plain balloon angioplasty. However, a new complication has accompanied these improvements： in-stent restenosis （ISR） arising from neointimal hyperplasia. ISR after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the main limitations of this method, leading to the recurrence of exertional angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes. The clinical incidence of ISR after bare-metal stent （BMS） implantation is approximately 20%35%. The use of drug-eluting stents （DES） has led to a further decrease in the occurrence of ISR to 5%-10%. Evidence resulting from controlled clinical studies suggests that DES and drug-eluting balloon catheters （DEB） provide the best clinical and angiographic results in the treatment of ISR. We undertook a systematic review of the pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment options for BMS- and DES-ISR. We discuss recent randomised studies, comparing different DES or DEB used for BMS or DES-ISR treatment, as well as the use of new biovascular scafolds and the topic of scafold restenosis.
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is the fifth most common tumor worldwide.Multiple treatment options are available for HCC including curative resection,liver transplantation,radiofrequency ablation,trans-arterial chemoembolization,radioembolization and systemic targeted agent like sorafenib.The treatment of HCC depends on the tumor stage,patient performance status and liver function reserve and requires a multidisciplinary approach.In the past few years with significant advances in surgical treatments and locoregional therapies,the short-term survival of HCC has improved but the recurrent disease remains a big problem.The pathogenesis of HCC is a multistep and complex process,wherein angiogenesis plays an important role.For patients with advanced disease,sorafenib is the only approved therapy,but novel systemic molecular targeted agents and their combinations are emerging.This article provides an overview of treatment of early and advanced stage HCC based on our extensive review of relevant literature.
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide.While curative therapies,including resection,liver transplantation,and percutaneous ablation(percutaneous ethanol injection and radiofrequency ablation),are applicable for only a portion of the HCC population,transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)has been recognized as an effective palliative treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.TACE is also used even for single HCCs in which it is difficult to perform surgical resection or locoregional treatment due to systemic co-morbidities or anatomical problems.TACE has become widely adopted in the treatment of HCC.By using computed tomography-angiography,TACE is capable of performing diagnosis and treatment at the same time.Furthermore,TACE plays an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment for HCC when combined with other treatment.In this review,we first discuss the history of TACE,and then review the previous findings about techniques of achieving a locoregional treatment effect(liver infarction treatment,e.g.,ultra-selective TACE,balloon-occluded TACE),and the use of TACE as a drugdelivery system for anti-cancer agents(palliative,e.g.,platinum complex agents,drug-eluting beads)for multiple lesions.
文摘Background Prognosis of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） and renal dysfunction （RD） who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has not been fully investigated in the drug-eluting stent （DES） era. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of admission serum creatinine level on short-term outcomes in patients with acute STEMI undergoing DES-based primary PCI. Methods Primary PCI with DES implantation was attempted in 619 consecutive STEMI patients within 12 hours of symptom onset. Among them, 86 patients had a serum creatinine level ≥115 μmol/L on admission （RD group）, and the remaining 533 patients had normal renal function （non-RD group）. The primary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiac events （MACE, including death, non-fatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization）, and the secondary endpoint was subacute stent thrombosis. Results Patients in the RD group were older than those in the non-RD group. There are more female patients in the RD group and they had a history of hypertension, myocardial infarction and revascularization. The occurrence rates of Killip class ≥2 （29.1% vs 18.6%, P=0.02） and multi-vessel （62.8% vs 44.5%, P=0.001） and triple vessel disease （32.6% vs 18.2%, P=0.002）, in-hospital mortality （9.3% vs 3.8%, P=0.03）, and MACE rate during hospitalization （17.4% vs 7.7%, P=-0.006） were higher in the RD group than those in the non-RD group. At a 30-day clinical follow-up, the MACE-free survival rate was significantly reduced in the RD group （76.7% vs 89.9%, P=-0.0003）. Angiographic stent thrombosis occurred in 3 （3.5%） and 7 （1.3%） of patients in the RD group and non-RD group, respectively （P=0.15）. Multivariate analysis revealed that the serum creatinine level 〉115 μmol/L on admission was an independent predictor for MACE rate at a 30-day follow-up （Hazard ratio （HR） 3.31,95% CI 1.19-9.18, P 〈0.001）. Conclusion Despite similar prevalence of stent thrombosis a
文摘Background:Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains challenging;a simple strategy has been preferred as of late,but the disadvantage is ostium stenosis or even occlusion of the side branch(SB).Only a few single-center studies investigating the combination of a drug-eluting stent in the main branch followed by a drug-eluting balloon in the SB have been reported.This prospective,multicenter,randomized study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon(PEB)compared with regular balloon angioplasty(BA)in the treatment of non-left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.Methods:Between December 2014 and November 2015,a total of 222 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions were enrolled in this study at ten Chinese centers.Patients were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to a PEB group(n=113)and a BA group(n=109).The primary efficacy endpoint was angiographic target lesion stenosis at 9 months.Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints included target lesion revascularization,target vessel revascularization,target lesion failure,major adverse cardiac and cerebral events(MACCEs),all-cause death,cardiac death,non-fatal myocardial infarction,and thrombosis in target lesions.The main analyses performed in this clinical trial included case shedding analysis,base-value equilibrium analysis,effectiveness analysis,and safety analysis.SAS version 9.4 was used for the statistical analyses.Results:At the 9-month angiographic follow-up,the difference in the primary efficacy endpoint of target lesion stenosis between the PEB(28.7%±18.7%)and BA groups(40.0%±19.0%)was-11.3%(95%confidence interval:-16.3%to-6.3%,Psuperiority<0.0001)in the intention-to-treat analysis,and similar results were recorded in the per-protocol analysis,demonstrating the superiority of PEB to BA.Late lumen loss was significantly lower in the PEB group than in the BA group(-0.06±0.32 vs.0.18±0.34 mm,P<0.0001).For intention-to-treat,there were no significant differences between PEB and BA in the 9-month percentages o
文摘Background： Currently, drug-eluting balloon （DEB） appears to be an attractive alternative option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis （ISR）. Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes of DEB have seldom been compared to those of new-generation drug-eluting stent （DES）. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEB compared to those of new-generation DES in the treatment of ISR. Methods： A comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to November 2, 2017 was performed to identify pertinent articles comparing DEB to new-generation DES for the treatment of ISR. In addition, conference proceedings for the scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, and EuroPCR were also searched. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization （TLR） at the longest follow-up. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios （RRs） with 95% confidence intervals （C/s）, while the overall RRs were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Results： Five randomized controlled trials （RCTs） and eight observational studies involving 2743 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, DEB was comparable to new-generation DES in terms ofTLR （RR = 1.24, 95% CI： 0.89-1.72, P = 0.21 ）, cardiac death （RR = 1.55, 95% CI： 0.89-2.71, P= 0.12）, major adverse cardiovascular event （RR = 1.21,95% CI： 0.98-1.48, P = 0.07）, myocardial infarction （RR = 1.12, 95% CI： 0.72-1.76, P = 0.62）, and stent thrombosis （RR = 0.95, 95% CI： 0.38-2.42, P associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality than new-generation DES （RR = 1.65, 95% CI： 1.09-2.50, P = true in the real-world observational studies （RR = 1.79, 95% CI： 1.12-2.88, P = 0.02）. In RCTs, however, no found between the two treatment strategies in the risk of all-cause mortality. 0.92）. However, DEB was
文摘Background Several clinical trials have shown that rapamycin-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The Firebird stent and the Excel stent （coated with bioabsorbable polymer） are two different types of rapamycin-eluUng stents made in China, both have been recently approved for clinical use in China by State Food and Drug Administration. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of stents in daily practice. Methods In the month of June 2006, a total of 190 consecutive patients were treated exclusively with Firebird stents （n=93, Firebird group） or Excel stents （n=97, Excel group） in our center and were included in this study. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events （MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization）, binary restenosis, and late lumen loss and stent thrombosis dudng a six-month follow-up period were compared between the two groups. Results Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates were low in hospital and at 6 months （2.1% in the Excel group and 0% in the Firebird group, P〉 0.05）. The 6-month angiographic in-stent restenosis rate was 0% in both groups, with an associated late loss of （0.15 ± 0.21） mm versus （0.14 ± 0.20） mm （P=0.858） and the in-segment restenosis rate was also 0% for the Excel group and the Firebird group. There was no definite stent thrombosis identified in either group during the six-month follow-up period and only one patient in the Excel group had probable stent thrombosis in hospital. Conclusions Results from this mid-term, single-center study showed that both of the Firebird and the Excel rapamycin eluUng stent had similar effects on reducing the incidence of MACE and the risk of restenosis （both in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis） after PCI in daily practice.
文摘Background The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） versus bare metal stents （BMS） are unclear and controversial issues in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DES versus BMS implantation. Methods A total of 191 patients with acute STEMI undergoing PCI from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2007 were enrolled. Patients received DES （n=83） or BMS （n=108） implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician＇s discretion. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events （MACE）, which was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction （MI）, target vessel revascularization （TVR） and stent thrombosis. The difference of MACE was observed between DES and BMS groups. Results The clinical follow-up duration was 3 years （（41.7±16.1） months）. MACE occurred in 20 patients during three years follow-up. Logistic regression analysis showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） was an independent predictor for MACE in the follow-up period （P=0.0301）. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality （3.61% vs. 7.41%, P=0.2647）, the incidence of myocardial infarction （0 vs. 0.93%, P=-0.379） and stent thrombosis （1.20% vs. 1.85%, P=0.727） between the DES group and BMS group. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the DES group compared to the BMS group （4.82% vs. 14.81%, P=0.0253）. The rate of TVR was also lower in the DES group （0 vs. 5.56%, P=0.029）. In the DES group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between sirolimus eluting stents （SES, n=73） and paclitaxel-eluting stents （PES, n=10） subgroups （2.74% vs. 20.00%, P 〉0.05）. Conclusions This finding suggested that drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the need for revascularization in pa
文摘Background Several clinical trials have shown that sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. The FIREBIRD stent （coated with durable polymer） and the EXCEL stent （coated with bioabsorbable polymer） are two different types of sirolimus-eluting stents made in China; both have been approved for clinical use in China by the State Food and Drug Administration. The mid-term （6-month） angiographic and clinical results of both stents have been confirmed exciting perspective outcomes. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in the long-term safety and efficacy between the two types of stents in daily practice.Methods All consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI with EXCEL or FIREBIRD stents between June 1,2006 and December 31, 2006 at Fu Wai Hospital in Beijing were included. Patients were classified from the index admission according to stent types （EXCEL or FIREBIRD） used. Clinical and procedural risk factors were collected prospectively. With propensity score matching without replacement, the frequency of major adverse cardiac events （MACE, a composite of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization） and stent thrombosis during a 2-year follow-up period were compared between the two groups.Results A total of 474 patients were treated with EXCEL, and 640 were treated with FIREBIRD. Three hundred and ninety-seven EXCEL patients were matched to 397 FIREBIRD patients, 2-year risk-adjusted MACE rates were 6.1% in EXCEL group and 7.6% in FIREBIRD group （HR 0.84, 95%CI0.50-1.43）, whereas the respective rates for mortality, myocardial infarction and target-vessel revascularization were 2.3% vs 2.8% （HR 0.74, 95%CI0.30-0.85）, 1.8% vs 1.3% （HR 1.41,95%CI 0.45-4.43） and 2.5% vs 4.0% （HR 0.62, 95%CI0.28-0.37）, respectively. Cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis at 2 years was 1.8% in the EXCEL group vs 1.3% in the FIREBIRD group （P=0.5610）, whereas the rate of very late stent
基金the-grant from Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation(No.05DZ19503)
文摘Background Drug-eluting stent （DES） has been used widely for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without diabetes mellitus during percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）, but its long-term safety and efficacy in diabetic patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after primary coronary intervention with DES implantation for diabetic patients with acute STEMI, compared with non-diabetic counterparts. Methods From December 2004 to March 2006, 56 consecutive diabetic patients （diabetic group） and 170 non-diabetic patients （non-diabetic group） with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI with DES implantation in 3 hospitals were enrolled. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, as well as occurrence of major adverse cardiac event （MACE） including cardiac death, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction （re-MI） and target vessel revascularization （TVR） during hospitalization and one-year clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results Patients in diabetic group were more hyperlipidemic （69.6% and 51.8%, P=-0.03） and had longer time delay from symptom onset to admission （（364±219） minutes and （309±223） minutes, P=-0.02） than those in non-diabetic group. The culprit vessel distribution, reference vessel diameter, and baseline TIMI flow grade were similar between the two groups, but multi-vessel disease was more common in diabetic than in non-diabetic group （82.1% and 51.2%, P〈0.001）. Despite similar TIMI flow grades between the two groups after stenting, the occurrence of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade （TMPG） 〉2 was lower in diabetic group （75.0% vs 88.8% in non-diabetic groups, P=-0.02）. The MACE rate was similar during hospitalization between the two groups （5.4% vs 3.5%, P=-0.72）, but it was significantly higher in diabetic group （16.1%） during one-year follow-up, as compared with non-d
文摘This article describes the evolution of minimally invasive intervention technologies for vascular restoration therapy from early-stage balloon angioplasty in 1970s,metallic bare metal stent and metallic drug-eluting stent technologies in 1990s and 2000s,to bioresorbable vascular scaffold(BVS)technology in large-scale development in recent years.The history,the current stage,the challenges and the future of BVS development are discussed in detail as the best available approach for vascular restoration therapy.The criteria of materials selection,design and processing principles of BVS,and the corresponding clinical trial results are also summarized in this article.
文摘Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) are at a higher risk of developing coronary artery disease(CAD) than are non-T2 DM patients. Moreover, the clinical outcomes in CAD with T2 DM are poor despite improvements in medications and other interventions. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in treating multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. However, selecting a revascularization strategy depends not only on the lesion complexity but also on the patient's medical history and comorbidities. Additionally, comprehensive risk management with medical and non-pharmacological therapies is important, as is confirmation regarding whether the risk-management strategies are being appropriately achieved. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions using exercise and diet during the earlier stages of glucose metabolism abnormalities, such as impaired glucose tolerance, might be beneficial in preventing the development or progression of T2 DM and in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events.
文摘Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure involving intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy to selectively administer high doses of cytotoxic drugs to the tumor bed along with ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization.Chemoembolization forms the essential core of management in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) who are not suitable for curative therapies such as transplantation,resection,or percutaneous ablation.TACE of hepatic cancer(s) has proven to be helpful in achieving local tumor control,and has supported the ability to prevent tumor progression,prolong patient life,and manage patient symptoms.Recent data have demonstrated that,in patients with single-nodule HCC ≤3 cm without vascular invasion,the 5-year overall survival with TACE was found to be comparable with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation.Used for several years,Lipiodol continues to play a vital role as a tumor-seeking and radiopaque drug delivery vector in interventional oncology.Efforts have been made to enhance the administration of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors.Compared with conventional TACE,drug-eluting bead TACE is a fairly new drug delivery embolization technique that permits fixed dosing and has the ability to provide sustained release of anticancer agents over a period of time.The present review discusses the basic procedure of TACE and its properties,and the effectiveness of conventional and drug-eluting bead chemoembolization systems currently available or presently undergoing clinical evaluation.
文摘Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is the current standard of therapy for patients with intermediatestage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. The concept of conventional TACE(cTACE) is the selective obstruction of tumor-feeding artery by injection of chemotherapeutic agents, leading to ischemic necrosis of the target tumor via cytotoxic and ischemic effects. Drugeluting beads(DEBs) have been imposed as novel drugdelivering agents for TACE, which allows for higher concentrations of drugs within the target tumor and lower systemic concentrations compared with cTACE. Despite the theoretical advantages of DEB-TACE, it is still controversial in clinical practice as to whether DEBTACE is superior to cTACE in regard to overall survival and treatment response. In this review article, we summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE for patients with intermediate or advanced stage HCC in comparison with cTACE.
基金a grant awarded to Dr. LIJian-jun from Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, China (No. 2004190)
文摘Background Patients with small coronary lesions are at increased risk for repeat interventions after coronary angioplasty and stenting. The efficacy of drug-eluting stents （DES） has been demonstrated to improve the outcomes of these patients and is a focus of interest. Currently, two platforms of DES are available （sirolimus-eluting stent （SES） and paclitaxel-eluting stent （PES））. However, it has less been known that DES, SES vs PES, is superior for the treatment of small coronary lesions. Methods In this retrospective study, 87 consecutive patients with 151 lesions underwent implantation of coronary SES （n=68） and PES （n=83）. Quantitative coronary angiography （QCA） was performed at the time of stent implantation and subsequently at 8 months post-stenting. Small vessel disease was defined as lesions in vessels with diameter 42.5 mm measured by QCA. Major adverse cardiac events （MACE） including death, thrombosis, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization （TLR） were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two groups. At clinical and angiographic follow-up, overall thrombosis rates were similar in both groups （0 vs 1.2%, P〉0.05）. The TLR and in-segment restenosis were not significantly different （19.1% vs 25.3%; 10.3% vs 10.8%, P=0.365 and P=0.913 respectively） between the two groups. The in-stent restenosis rate, however, was significantly higher in the PES group （4.4% vs 21.7%; P=0.002）. Similarly, the late loss was significantly higher in the PES group （（0.14±0.38） mm vs （0.49±0.61） mm; P〈0.001）. Conclusions In this small sample-size, non-randomized study, the data indicated that implantation of SES for the treatment of patients with small coronary lesion showed more favorable results in respect of restenosis compared with PES implantation.
文摘Background： There are limited data on longer-term outcomes （〉5 years） for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery （ULMCA） disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in the drug-eluting stents （DES） era. This study aimed at comparing the long-term （〉5 years） outcomes of patients with ULMCA disease underwent PCI with DES and coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and the predictors of adverse events. Methods： All consecutive patients with ULMCA disease treated with DES implantation versus CABG in our center, between January 2003 and July 2009, were screened for analyzing. A propensity score analysis was carried out to adjust for potential confounding between the two groups. Results： Nine hundred and twenty-two patients with ULMCA disease were enrolled for the analyses （DES = 465 vs. CABG = 457）. During the median follow-up of 7.1 years （interquartile range 5.3-8.2 years）, no difference was found between PCI and CABG in the occurrence of death （P = 0.282） and the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction （MI） and stroke （P = 0.294）. Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI group （P = 0.014） in large part because of the significantly higher rate of repeat revascularization （P 〈 0.001）. PC/was correlated with the lower occurrence of stroke （P = 0.004）. Multivariate analysis showed ejection fraction （EF） （P = 0.012）, creatinine （P = 0.016）, and prior stroke （P = 0.03 l） were independent predictors of the composite endpoint of cardiac death, MI, and stroke in the DES group, while age （P = 0.026） and EF （P = 0.002） were independent predictors in the CABG group. Conclusions： During a median follow-up of 7.1 years, there was no difference in the rate of death between PCI with DES implantation and CABG in ULMCA lesions in the patient cohort. CABG group was observed to have significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization but
文摘Background Previous studies indicated that long coronary lesions are one of the key predictors of drug-eluting stent （DES） failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the long length FIREHAWK stent in long coronary artery disease. Methods The long cohort of TARGET I was a prospective, multicenter, single arm trial. It was planned to enroll 50 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for the treatment of de novo long lesions in a native coronary artery. The major inclusion criteria of the trial was that patients were intended to undergo the treatment of a long target lesion（s） with diameter stenosis 〉70% and reference vessel diameter 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm by visual estimate, that needed to be covered by at least one 33 mm or 38 mm stent or multiple long stents overlapped. The angiographic follow-up was planned at 9-month and the clinical follow-up will be up to 5 years. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month. Results Fifty patients （mean age （57.6±10.2） years） with 59 de novo long lesions （reference vessel diameter （2.85±0.44） mm, lesion length （35.2±9.4） mm, and stent length （41.8±11.3） mm） were enrolled. The angiographic follow-up rate was 92% at 9-month. The in-stent late loss was （0.16±0.16） mm. Proximal edge, distal edge and in-segment late loss （mm） were 0.21±0.35, 0.03±0.33, and 0.07±0.26, respectively. No in-segment binary restenosis was observed. At 1-year no death, Q wave myocardial infarction （MI）, or stent thrombosis occurred. Non-Q-wave MI occurred in two patients （4%） due to procedural complications. Conclusions Treatment of long coronary lesions with the FIREHAWK stent is able to produce similar results as observed in the FIREHAWK~ FIM clinical trial. Based on this result, we are confident in the treatment prospect of the FIREHAWK for long coronary lesions.
文摘AIM To assess the usefulness of intra-arterial contrastenhanced ultrasonography(IAUS) during transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) with drug-eluting beads(DEB) for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS Thirty two patients with 39 HCC underwent DEB-TACE guided with IAUS, and examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) or dynamic CT after DEB-TACE were enrolled in this study. CEUS findings before DEBTACE and IAUS findings were compared. Treatments judged to be complete and incomplete for lesions were appropriate and insufficient, respectively. Findings on CEUS and/or dynamic CT performed 1, 3 and 6 mo after DEB-TACE were evaluated using m RECIST(CR/PR/SD/PD).RESULTS The treatments were complete and incomplete in 26 and 13 lesions, respectively. On imaging evaluation using CEUS and/or dynamic CT one month after treatment, 25 and 1 lesions were judged to be CR and PR, respectively, and at 6 mo after treatment, the results were CR, PR, SD and PD for 24, 1, 0 and 1 of these lesions, respectively, in the 26 completely treated lesions. Of the 13 lesions in which treatment was incomplete, the results on imaging at one month after treatment were CR, PR, SD and PD for 0, 6, 4 and 3 lesions, respectively. The overall CR rate at 6 mo after treatment was 61.5%(24/39).CONCLUSION A combination of DEB-TACE with IAUS can improve the therapeutic effects in patients with HCC.
