Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with...Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Many studies using myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) showed that,for patients with moderate to severe ischemia,revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit,whereas for patients with no to mild ischemia,medical therapy is the main choice,and revascularization is associated with increased mortality.There is some evidence that revascularization in patients with no or mild ischemia is likely to result in worsened ischemia,which is associated with increased mortality.Studies using fractional flow reserve(FFR) demonstrate that ischemia-guided PCI is superior to angiography-guided PCI,and the presence of ischemia is the key to decisionmaking for PCI.Complementary use of noninvasive MPI and invasive FFR would be important to compensate for each method's limitations.Recent studies of appropriateness criteria showed that,although PCI in the acute setting and coronary bypass surgery are properly performed in most patients,PCI in the non-acute set-ting is often inappropriate,and stress testing to identify myocardial ischemia is performed in less than half of patients.Also,some studies suggested that revascularization in an inappropriate setting is not associated with improved prognosis.Taken together,the presence and the extent of myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease,and coronary revascularization in the absence of myocardial ischemia is associated with worsened prognosis.展开更多
widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the...widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the main bottleneck to the of stent technique. Despite drug-eluting stents used widely, restenosis rate is still about 10%. The restenosis was associated with intervention injury, patient factors, genetic types, nerve endocrine so on Overview above aspects is expected to provide some ideas for restenosis prevention and treatment.展开更多
Background Diabetes is often associated with coronary artery disease,leading to adverse clinical outcomes.Real-world data is limited regarding the impact of diabetes in very old patients undergoing coronary angiograph...Background Diabetes is often associated with coronary artery disease,leading to adverse clinical outcomes.Real-world data is limited regarding the impact of diabetes in very old patients undergoing coronary angiography on the risk for late or repeated coronary revascularization and mortality.Methods Retrospective analysis of 1,353 consecutive patients>80 years who were admitted to the cardiac unit and further underwent coronary angiography.Subsequent revascularization procedures and all-cause mortality were recorded over a median fbllow-up of 47 months and their relation to diabetic status and presentation with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)was studied.Results Diabetes was present in 31%of the patients undergoing coronary angiography,and was associated with higher rates of obesity,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,chronic kidney disease and female gender.ACS was the presenting diagnosis in 71%of the patients and was associated with worse survival(1-year mortality 20%in ACS vs.6.2%in non-ACS patients,P<0.0001).Increase in long-term mortality rates was seen in diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects presenting with ACS(log-rank P=0.005),but not in the non-ACS setting(P=0」99).In a multivariable model,additionally adjusting for acuity of presentation,the presence of diabetes was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.60(95%confidence interval:12-2.28),P=0.011,for the need of late or repeat coronary revascularization and 1.48(1.26-1.74),P<0.0001 for all-cause mortality,during long-term follow-up.Conclusions In very old patients undergoing coronary angiography,presentation with ACS was associated with worse survival.Diabetes was an independent predictor of late or repeated revascularization and long-term mortality.展开更多
Coronary angiography is considered to be the gold standard in the morphological evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. The morphological assessment of the severity of a coronary lesion is very subjective. Thus, the i...Coronary angiography is considered to be the gold standard in the morphological evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. The morphological assessment of the severity of a coronary lesion is very subjective. Thus, the invasive fractional flow reserve(FFR) measurement represents the current standard for estimation of the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. The FFR-guided revascularization strategy was initially classified as a Class-IA-recommendation in the 2014 European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Both the Deferral vs Performance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Non-Significant Coronary Stenosis and Flow Reserve vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation studies showed no treatment advantage for hemodynamically insignificant stenoses. With the help of FFR(and targeted interventions), clinical results could be improved; however, the use in clinical practice is still limited due to the need of adenosine administration and a significant prolongation of the length of the procedure. Instantaneous wave-free ratio(iFR~) is a new innovative approach for the determination of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis, which can be obtained at rest without the use of vasodilators. Regarding the periprocedural complications as well as prognosis, iFR~ showed non-inferiority to FFR in the SWEDEHEART and DEFINE-FLAIR trials. Furthermore, iFR~, enhanced by iFR~-pullback, provides the possibility to display the iFR~-change over the course of the vessel to create a hemodynamic map.展开更多
文摘Previous studies demonstrated that coronary revascularization,especially percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),does not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Many studies using myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) showed that,for patients with moderate to severe ischemia,revascularization is the preferred therapy for survival benefit,whereas for patients with no to mild ischemia,medical therapy is the main choice,and revascularization is associated with increased mortality.There is some evidence that revascularization in patients with no or mild ischemia is likely to result in worsened ischemia,which is associated with increased mortality.Studies using fractional flow reserve(FFR) demonstrate that ischemia-guided PCI is superior to angiography-guided PCI,and the presence of ischemia is the key to decisionmaking for PCI.Complementary use of noninvasive MPI and invasive FFR would be important to compensate for each method's limitations.Recent studies of appropriateness criteria showed that,although PCI in the acute setting and coronary bypass surgery are properly performed in most patients,PCI in the non-acute set-ting is often inappropriate,and stress testing to identify myocardial ischemia is performed in less than half of patients.Also,some studies suggested that revascularization in an inappropriate setting is not associated with improved prognosis.Taken together,the presence and the extent of myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease,and coronary revascularization in the absence of myocardial ischemia is associated with worsened prognosis.
文摘widely used development incidence of factors and Coronary stent implantation was considered as a way of coronary revascularization. It has been in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but restenosis has become the main bottleneck to the of stent technique. Despite drug-eluting stents used widely, restenosis rate is still about 10%. The restenosis was associated with intervention injury, patient factors, genetic types, nerve endocrine so on Overview above aspects is expected to provide some ideas for restenosis prevention and treatment.
文摘Background Diabetes is often associated with coronary artery disease,leading to adverse clinical outcomes.Real-world data is limited regarding the impact of diabetes in very old patients undergoing coronary angiography on the risk for late or repeated coronary revascularization and mortality.Methods Retrospective analysis of 1,353 consecutive patients>80 years who were admitted to the cardiac unit and further underwent coronary angiography.Subsequent revascularization procedures and all-cause mortality were recorded over a median fbllow-up of 47 months and their relation to diabetic status and presentation with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)was studied.Results Diabetes was present in 31%of the patients undergoing coronary angiography,and was associated with higher rates of obesity,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,chronic kidney disease and female gender.ACS was the presenting diagnosis in 71%of the patients and was associated with worse survival(1-year mortality 20%in ACS vs.6.2%in non-ACS patients,P<0.0001).Increase in long-term mortality rates was seen in diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects presenting with ACS(log-rank P=0.005),but not in the non-ACS setting(P=0」99).In a multivariable model,additionally adjusting for acuity of presentation,the presence of diabetes was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.60(95%confidence interval:12-2.28),P=0.011,for the need of late or repeat coronary revascularization and 1.48(1.26-1.74),P<0.0001 for all-cause mortality,during long-term follow-up.Conclusions In very old patients undergoing coronary angiography,presentation with ACS was associated with worse survival.Diabetes was an independent predictor of late or repeated revascularization and long-term mortality.
文摘Coronary angiography is considered to be the gold standard in the morphological evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. The morphological assessment of the severity of a coronary lesion is very subjective. Thus, the invasive fractional flow reserve(FFR) measurement represents the current standard for estimation of the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. The FFR-guided revascularization strategy was initially classified as a Class-IA-recommendation in the 2014 European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Both the Deferral vs Performance of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Non-Significant Coronary Stenosis and Flow Reserve vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation studies showed no treatment advantage for hemodynamically insignificant stenoses. With the help of FFR(and targeted interventions), clinical results could be improved; however, the use in clinical practice is still limited due to the need of adenosine administration and a significant prolongation of the length of the procedure. Instantaneous wave-free ratio(iFR~) is a new innovative approach for the determination of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis, which can be obtained at rest without the use of vasodilators. Regarding the periprocedural complications as well as prognosis, iFR~ showed non-inferiority to FFR in the SWEDEHEART and DEFINE-FLAIR trials. Furthermore, iFR~, enhanced by iFR~-pullback, provides the possibility to display the iFR~-change over the course of the vessel to create a hemodynamic map.
